On the frontlines: Identifying individual and organizational factors associated with managerial perceived ability to take actions to prevent sickness absence in employees with mental health problems

IF 2.3 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Scandinavian Journal of Management Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-06-18 DOI:10.1016/j.scaman.2026.101470
Linda Corin, Lisa Björk, Gunnel Hensing, Carin Staland-Nyman, Stephen Stansfeld, Christian Ståhl, Monica Bertilsson
{"title":"On the frontlines: Identifying individual and organizational factors associated with managerial perceived ability to take actions to prevent sickness absence in employees with mental health problems","authors":"Linda Corin,&nbsp;Lisa Björk,&nbsp;Gunnel Hensing,&nbsp;Carin Staland-Nyman,&nbsp;Stephen Stansfeld,&nbsp;Christian Ståhl,&nbsp;Monica Bertilsson","doi":"10.1016/j.scaman.2026.101470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigates self-reported managerial perceived ability to take actions aimed at preventing employees´ sickness absence within an occupational setting, focusing on three specific preventive strategies: actions to adapt tasks and setting, social support actions, and actions to involve experts. Regression trees, combined with bootstrap aggregation to improve model stability, were applied in an exploratory framework to identify key factors associated with the perceived ability to take actions. Distal organizational factors, such as organizational support and climate, showed the strongest associations with managers' perceived ability to take actions to prevent sickness absence, followed by more proximal organizational factors in terms of managers’ psychosocial working conditions. In contrast, individual factors, and notably, the broader organizational context in terms of industrial sector and organizational size, were comparatively less strongly associated. By accounting for the complexity of managers' work situation, this study provides novel insights and important knowledge. Future studies are needed to test the organizational factors identified in the study as more appropriate organizational preconditions for managers to support and retain employees with mental health problems at work.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47759,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","volume":"42 3","pages":"Article 101470"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0956522126000163","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates self-reported managerial perceived ability to take actions aimed at preventing employees´ sickness absence within an occupational setting, focusing on three specific preventive strategies: actions to adapt tasks and setting, social support actions, and actions to involve experts. Regression trees, combined with bootstrap aggregation to improve model stability, were applied in an exploratory framework to identify key factors associated with the perceived ability to take actions. Distal organizational factors, such as organizational support and climate, showed the strongest associations with managers' perceived ability to take actions to prevent sickness absence, followed by more proximal organizational factors in terms of managers’ psychosocial working conditions. In contrast, individual factors, and notably, the broader organizational context in terms of industrial sector and organizational size, were comparatively less strongly associated. By accounting for the complexity of managers' work situation, this study provides novel insights and important knowledge. Future studies are needed to test the organizational factors identified in the study as more appropriate organizational preconditions for managers to support and retain employees with mental health problems at work.
在第一线:确定与管理人员感知到的采取行动防止有精神健康问题的员工病假的能力相关的个人和组织因素
本研究调查了自我报告的管理层感知能力,以采取旨在防止员工在职业环境中生病缺席的行动,重点关注三种具体的预防策略:适应任务和环境的行动,社会支持行动,以及专家参与的行动。回归树与自举聚合相结合以提高模型稳定性,在探索性框架中应用,以确定与感知能力相关的关键因素采取行动。远端组织因素,如组织支持和气候,显示出与管理者采取行动防止病假的感知能力最强的关联,其次是更近端的组织因素,即管理者的社会心理工作条件。相比之下,个人因素,特别是在工业部门和组织规模方面的更广泛的组织背景,相对来说联系不那么紧密。通过考虑管理者工作情境的复杂性,本研究提供了新颖的见解和重要的知识。未来的研究需要测试研究中确定的组织因素是否更适合管理者在工作中支持和留住有心理健康问题的员工的组织先决条件。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Management (SJM) provides an international forum for innovative and carefully crafted research on different aspects of management. We promote dialogue and new thinking around theory and practice, based on conceptual creativity, reasoned reflexivity and contextual awareness. We have a passion for empirical inquiry. We promote constructive dialogue among researchers as well as between researchers and practitioners. We encourage new approaches to the study of management and we aim to foster new thinking around management theory and practice. We publish original empirical and theoretical material, which contributes to understanding management in private and public organizations. Full-length articles and book reviews form the core of the journal, but focused discussion-type texts (around 3.000-5.000 words), empirically or theoretically oriented, can also be considered for publication. The Scandinavian Journal of Management is open to different research approaches in terms of methodology and epistemology. We are open to different fields of management application, but narrow technical discussions relevant only to specific sub-fields will not be given priority.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书