{"title":"The effect of negative electrode and cyclable lithium on the bulk redox mechanisms of lithium-and manganese-rich positive electrodes","authors":"Chun Yuen Kwok,Avi Gargye,Subhadip Mallick,Pavan Badami,Christopher J Pollock,Jason Croy,Daniel Abraham,Mahalingam Balasubramanian","doi":"10.1039/d6ee04706h","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lithium- and manganese-rich (LMR) oxides are of commercial interest offering high energy density at a competitive cost, but their redox behavior on extended cycling remains poorly understood. Most mechanistic understanding have been derived from lithium-metal half-cell studies, which do not faithfully reflect practical full-cell electrochemistry as the cathode potential and cyclable lithium evolves dynamically. Here, we study an exemplar cobalt-free LMR (0.3Li2MnO3●0.7LiMn0.5Ni0.5O2) material using multiple full-cell architectures that span a wide range of lithium inventory retention and definitively show that, under the tested full-cell operating and electrode-harvesting conditions, LMR materials do not undergo a conversion from oxygen to manganese redox upon extended cycling. Across all full-cell configurations – including those that preserve lithium inventory most effectively and maintain access to the low-voltage lithium insertion/removal sites for hundreds of cycles – we find no evidence for the emergence of bulk high-spin trivalent manganese. Instead, manganese reduction is observed only in relithiated half-cell environments, indicating that manganese reduction originates from system level factors, and not from a genuine shift in the cathode redox mechanisms. These results demonstrate that half-cell interpretations do not automatically transfer to full-cells and refute prevailing notions that manganese reduction drives voltage fade and that oxygen redox is fundamentally irreversible.","PeriodicalId":72,"journal":{"name":"Energy & Environmental Science","volume":"485 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":30.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy & Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1039/d6ee04706h","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lithium- and manganese-rich (LMR) oxides are of commercial interest offering high energy density at a competitive cost, but their redox behavior on extended cycling remains poorly understood. Most mechanistic understanding have been derived from lithium-metal half-cell studies, which do not faithfully reflect practical full-cell electrochemistry as the cathode potential and cyclable lithium evolves dynamically. Here, we study an exemplar cobalt-free LMR (0.3Li2MnO3●0.7LiMn0.5Ni0.5O2) material using multiple full-cell architectures that span a wide range of lithium inventory retention and definitively show that, under the tested full-cell operating and electrode-harvesting conditions, LMR materials do not undergo a conversion from oxygen to manganese redox upon extended cycling. Across all full-cell configurations – including those that preserve lithium inventory most effectively and maintain access to the low-voltage lithium insertion/removal sites for hundreds of cycles – we find no evidence for the emergence of bulk high-spin trivalent manganese. Instead, manganese reduction is observed only in relithiated half-cell environments, indicating that manganese reduction originates from system level factors, and not from a genuine shift in the cathode redox mechanisms. These results demonstrate that half-cell interpretations do not automatically transfer to full-cells and refute prevailing notions that manganese reduction drives voltage fade and that oxygen redox is fundamentally irreversible.
期刊介绍:
Energy & Environmental Science, a peer-reviewed scientific journal, publishes original research and review articles covering interdisciplinary topics in the (bio)chemical and (bio)physical sciences, as well as chemical engineering disciplines. Published monthly by the Royal Society of Chemistry (RSC), a not-for-profit publisher, Energy & Environmental Science is recognized as a leading journal. It boasts an impressive impact factor of 8.500 as of 2009, ranking 8th among 140 journals in the category "Chemistry, Multidisciplinary," second among 71 journals in "Energy & Fuels," second among 128 journals in "Engineering, Chemical," and first among 181 scientific journals in "Environmental Sciences."
Energy & Environmental Science publishes various types of articles, including Research Papers (original scientific work), Review Articles, Perspectives, and Minireviews (feature review-type articles of broad interest), Communications (original scientific work of an urgent nature), Opinions (personal, often speculative viewpoints or hypotheses on current topics), and Analysis Articles (in-depth examination of energy-related issues).