Comparative Efficacy of Specific Exercise Interventions on Post-Stroke Depression, Anxiety and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

IF 3.8
Yu-Cheng Wang, Yi-Ran Huang, Xiao-Xuan Meng, Qinge Zhang, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Gabor S Ungvari, Todd Jackson, Gang Wang, Yu-Tao Xiang
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Specific Exercise Interventions on Post-Stroke Depression, Anxiety and Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.","authors":"Yu-Cheng Wang, Yi-Ran Huang, Xiao-Xuan Meng, Qinge Zhang, Yuan Feng, Zhaohui Su, Teris Cheung, Gabor S Ungvari, Todd Jackson, Gang Wang, Yu-Tao Xiang","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2026.08.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Post-stroke depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are prevalent in older adults and may impede recovery. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of exercise interventions for these outcomes using network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched five international and two Chinese databases from inception to July 2025 for randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults with stroke receiving exercise-based interventions. Primary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and cognitive function. Treatment effects were estimated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and interventions were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Risk of bias and confidence in estimates were assessed with RoB 2 and CINeMA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-two trials involving 4,170 participants were included; 11 were at low risk of bias. For depression, dual-task training (DTT), mind-body exercise (MBE), and balance/coordination training (BCT) ranked highest and showed statistically credible benefits versus usual care. For anxiety, MBE, resistance/strength training (RST), and DTT ranked highest, with statistically credible benefits observed for RST and DTT, whereas EFR was associated with worse anxiety outcomes. For cognitive function, MBE, general aerobic exercise (GA), and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) ranked highest, whereas BCT was the only intervention showing a statistically credible benefit versus usual care. Meta-regression suggested that longer time since stroke was associated with smaller benefits for anxiety and cognitive outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Exercise interventions may yield outcome-specific benefits after stroke in older adults. These findings support individualized, phase-sensitive exercise prescription in post-stroke rehabilitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520785,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of geriatric psychiatry : official journal of the American Association for Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2026.08.012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Post-stroke depression, anxiety, and cognitive impairment are prevalent in older adults and may impede recovery. We evaluated the comparative efficacy of exercise interventions for these outcomes using network meta-analysis.

Methods: We systematically searched five international and two Chinese databases from inception to July 2025 for randomized controlled trials enrolling older adults with stroke receiving exercise-based interventions. Primary outcomes were depression, anxiety, and cognitive function. Treatment effects were estimated as standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% credible intervals (CrIs), and interventions were ranked using surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA). Risk of bias and confidence in estimates were assessed with RoB 2 and CINeMA.

Results: Fifty-two trials involving 4,170 participants were included; 11 were at low risk of bias. For depression, dual-task training (DTT), mind-body exercise (MBE), and balance/coordination training (BCT) ranked highest and showed statistically credible benefits versus usual care. For anxiety, MBE, resistance/strength training (RST), and DTT ranked highest, with statistically credible benefits observed for RST and DTT, whereas EFR was associated with worse anxiety outcomes. For cognitive function, MBE, general aerobic exercise (GA), and moderate-intensity continuous training (MICT) ranked highest, whereas BCT was the only intervention showing a statistically credible benefit versus usual care. Meta-regression suggested that longer time since stroke was associated with smaller benefits for anxiety and cognitive outcomes.

Conclusions: Exercise interventions may yield outcome-specific benefits after stroke in older adults. These findings support individualized, phase-sensitive exercise prescription in post-stroke rehabilitation.

特定运动干预对老年人脑卒中后抑郁、焦虑和认知功能的比较疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和网络荟萃分析。
背景:脑卒中后抑郁、焦虑和认知障碍在老年人中普遍存在,并可能阻碍康复。我们使用网络荟萃分析评估了运动干预对这些结果的比较功效。方法:我们系统地检索了5个国际数据库和2个中国数据库,从建立到2025年7月,纳入接受运动干预的老年中风患者的随机对照试验。主要结局是抑郁、焦虑和认知功能。采用95%可信区间(cri)的标准化平均差(smd)估计治疗效果,并采用累积排序曲线下的曲面(SUCRA)对干预措施进行排序。用RoB 2和CINeMA评估估计的偏倚风险和置信度。结果:纳入52项试验,涉及4170名受试者;11例偏倚风险较低。对于抑郁症,双任务训练(DTT)、身心锻炼(MBE)和平衡/协调训练(BCT)排名最高,与常规护理相比,在统计上显示出可靠的益处。对于焦虑,MBE、阻力/力量训练(RST)和DTT排名最高,RST和DTT具有统计学上可信的益处,而EFR与更差的焦虑结果相关。对于认知功能,MBE、一般有氧运动(GA)和中等强度连续训练(MICT)排名最高,而BCT是唯一在统计上与常规护理相比有可靠益处的干预措施。元回归表明,中风后时间越长,对焦虑和认知结果的益处越小。结论:运动干预可能会对老年人中风后的预后产生特定的益处。这些发现支持中风后康复的个体化、阶段性运动处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书