Five-year durability of aortic root preservation in type A aortic dissection: A single centre experience in 1,333 patients.

IF 1.4 0 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Zheng Zuo, Jun Li, Junyu Zhai, Lili Dong, Hao Lai, Chunsheng Wang
{"title":"Five-year durability of aortic root preservation in type A aortic dissection: A single centre experience in 1,333 patients.","authors":"Zheng Zuo, Jun Li, Junyu Zhai, Lili Dong, Hao Lai, Chunsheng Wang","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivag249","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of aortic root preservation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and significant preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included patients who underwent surgical repair for ATAAD with aortic root preservation from 2005 to 2024. Root preservation was preferred unless limited by severely damaged root intima, significant AR with cusp lesions, dilated sinus, or connective tissue disorder. Patients were stratified into an AR group (moderate or severe AR) and a non-AR group (less than moderate AR). Primary outcomes included overall survival and freedom from recurrent AR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Totally 1,333 patients were included into AR group (n = 369) and non-AR group (n = 964). Overall 30-day mortality was 11.3% (15.2% AR group vs 9.9% non-AR group; P = .006); however, preoperative AR was not associated with early mortality after multivariate adjustment. Overall survival at 10 years was comparable between groups (93.6% vs 92.3%). Freedom from recurrent AR at 10 years was 88% in the AR group compared to 97.1% in the non-AR group (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, intraoperative residual mild AR (Hazard ratio [HR] 4.08, P = .001) and connective tissue disorders (HR 4.36, P = .018) were the strongest predictors of recurrence. Without presence of intraoperative residual mild AR, preoperative moderate/severe AR did not increase risk or late recurrence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aortic root preservation demonstrated satisfactory mid-term outcomes and may represent a safe and durable strategy for ATAAD with significant preoperative AR. Intraoperative residual mild AR increases risk of recurrence, warranting closer monitoring.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the mid-term outcomes of aortic root preservation in patients with acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) and significant preoperative aortic regurgitation (AR).

Methods: The study included patients who underwent surgical repair for ATAAD with aortic root preservation from 2005 to 2024. Root preservation was preferred unless limited by severely damaged root intima, significant AR with cusp lesions, dilated sinus, or connective tissue disorder. Patients were stratified into an AR group (moderate or severe AR) and a non-AR group (less than moderate AR). Primary outcomes included overall survival and freedom from recurrent AR.

Results: Totally 1,333 patients were included into AR group (n = 369) and non-AR group (n = 964). Overall 30-day mortality was 11.3% (15.2% AR group vs 9.9% non-AR group; P = .006); however, preoperative AR was not associated with early mortality after multivariate adjustment. Overall survival at 10 years was comparable between groups (93.6% vs 92.3%). Freedom from recurrent AR at 10 years was 88% in the AR group compared to 97.1% in the non-AR group (P < .001). In multivariable analysis, intraoperative residual mild AR (Hazard ratio [HR] 4.08, P = .001) and connective tissue disorders (HR 4.36, P = .018) were the strongest predictors of recurrence. Without presence of intraoperative residual mild AR, preoperative moderate/severe AR did not increase risk or late recurrence.

Conclusions: Aortic root preservation demonstrated satisfactory mid-term outcomes and may represent a safe and durable strategy for ATAAD with significant preoperative AR. Intraoperative residual mild AR increases risk of recurrence, warranting closer monitoring.

A型主动脉夹层主动脉根部保存的5年持久性:1333例患者的单中心经验。
目的:评价急性A型主动脉夹层(ATAAD)术前主动脉返流明显(AR)患者主动脉根部保留的中期疗效。方法:本研究纳入2005年至2024年接受主动脉根部保留手术修复的ATAAD患者。除非受到严重受损的根内膜、伴有尖部病变的明显AR、窦扩张或结缔组织紊乱的限制,否则首选根保存。患者被分为AR组(中度或重度AR)和非AR组(小于中度AR)。主要结局包括总生存期和无复发性AR。结果:共有1333例患者被分为AR组(n = 369)和非AR组(n = 964)。总体30天死亡率为11.3% (AR组15.2% vs非AR组9.9%,P = 0.006);然而,经多因素调整后,术前AR与早期死亡率无关。10年总生存率组间比较(93.6% vs 92.3%)。AR组10年复发性AR的发生率为88%,而非AR组为97.1% (P < 0.001)。在多变量分析中,术中残余轻度AR(危险比[HR] 4.08, P = .001)和结缔组织疾病(危险比[HR] 4.36, P = .018)是复发的最强预测因子。如果术中没有残留的轻度AR,术前中度/重度AR不会增加复发风险或晚期复发。结论:主动脉根部保留表现出令人满意的中期结果,可能是一种安全持久的策略,用于术前明显AR的ATAAD。术中残留的轻度AR增加复发风险,需要密切监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书