Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare.

IF 2.3 2区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-09-09 DOI:10.1111/bioe.70188
Marta Szabat
{"title":"Protecting Patient Information in Healthcare.","authors":"Marta Szabat","doi":"10.1111/bioe.70188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper considers the connection between fairness and unfairness from a theoretical standpoint, highlighting the importance of critically evaluating the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on patients' perception of healthcare justice. The arguments and analysis are framed within the context of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' and Miranda Fricker's concept of 'epistemic injustice'. The article suggests that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action. The paper concludes that renewing patients' commitment to critical thinking and encouraging them to take greater personal responsibility are key. More active and engaged citizenship is also required. By cultivating critical reflection, prioritising data privacy, promoting collective support, building emotional resilience, and advocating for ethical AI, individuals can transform their healthcare into a formidable bulwark against those who seek to curtail their autonomy and stifle their voices. This comprehensive healthcare strategy is about more than just the individual's welfare. It is also about creating a fair, self-governing society in which the potential of each person as a smart, active participant is recognised and protected.</p>","PeriodicalId":55379,"journal":{"name":"Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.70188","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper considers the connection between fairness and unfairness from a theoretical standpoint, highlighting the importance of critically evaluating the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) tools on patients' perception of healthcare justice. The arguments and analysis are framed within the context of Hannah Arendt's concept of the 'banality of evil' and Miranda Fricker's concept of 'epistemic injustice'. The article suggests that the greatest threat to fairness and transparency when it comes to AI may not be people deliberately trying to cause harm, but rather a widespread culture of apathy and complacency that prevents people from taking action. The paper concludes that renewing patients' commitment to critical thinking and encouraging them to take greater personal responsibility are key. More active and engaged citizenship is also required. By cultivating critical reflection, prioritising data privacy, promoting collective support, building emotional resilience, and advocating for ethical AI, individuals can transform their healthcare into a formidable bulwark against those who seek to curtail their autonomy and stifle their voices. This comprehensive healthcare strategy is about more than just the individual's welfare. It is also about creating a fair, self-governing society in which the potential of each person as a smart, active participant is recognised and protected.

在医疗保健中保护患者信息。
本文从理论角度考虑了公平与不公平之间的联系,强调了批判性评估人工智能(AI)工具对患者对医疗公正的感知的潜在影响的重要性。这些论点和分析是在汉娜·阿伦特的“平庸之恶”概念和米兰达·弗里克的“认知不公正”概念的背景下进行的。这篇文章表明,在人工智能方面,对公平和透明度的最大威胁可能不是人们故意造成伤害,而是一种普遍存在的冷漠和自满的文化,这种文化阻碍了人们采取行动。这篇论文的结论是,让病人重新投入批判性思维,鼓励他们承担更大的个人责任是关键。还需要更积极、更投入的公民意识。通过培养批判性反思,优先考虑数据隐私,促进集体支持,建立情感弹性,倡导道德人工智能,个人可以将其医疗保健转变为强大的堡垒,对抗那些试图限制其自主权和扼杀其声音的人。这一全面的医疗保健战略不仅仅关乎个人的福利。它还涉及创建一个公平、自治的社会,在这个社会中,每个人作为聪明、积极参与者的潜力都得到承认和保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Bioethics
Bioethics 医学-医学:伦理
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
9.10%
发文量
127
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: As medical technology continues to develop, the subject of bioethics has an ever increasing practical relevance for all those working in philosophy, medicine, law, sociology, public policy, education and related fields. Bioethics provides a forum for well-argued articles on the ethical questions raised by current issues such as: international collaborative clinical research in developing countries; public health; infectious disease; AIDS; managed care; genomics and stem cell research. These questions are considered in relation to concrete ethical, legal and policy problems, or in terms of the fundamental concepts, principles and theories used in discussions of such problems. Bioethics also features regular Background Briefings on important current debates in the field. These feature articles provide excellent material for bioethics scholars, teachers and students alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书