Charles Zhang, Nicholas Leung, Baltaj Sandhur, Daniel Zhu, Joaquin Sosa-Lockward, Nicolas A Yannuzzi, Basil K Williams, Hong-Uyen Hua, Audina M Berrocal
{"title":"Adjuvant Anti-VEGF Therapy During Ablative Treatment for Coats Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Charles Zhang, Nicholas Leung, Baltaj Sandhur, Daniel Zhu, Joaquin Sosa-Lockward, Nicolas A Yannuzzi, Basil K Williams, Hong-Uyen Hua, Audina M Berrocal","doi":"10.1097/IAE.0000000000005008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy combined with standard ablative treatment in Coats disease.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS was conducted to identify studies comparing ablative therapy alone versus ablative therapy with anti-VEGF for Coats disease. Five studies (136 eyes treated with ablation alone and 82 with combination therapy) were included. Data on treatment sessions, quiescence, visual acuity (VA) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) were extracted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adjunctive anti-VEGF significantly reduced the treatment sessions required to achieve quiescence (Mean difference [MD] 0.47 sessions, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.85, p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in anatomic outcomes with both groups having a similar number of eyes which resulted in phthisis. No significant difference was found in the BCVA at final follow up (MD = 0.20, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.59, p = 0.33) without significant heterogeneity (I2 =23%, p = 0.28). Eyes with adjunctive anti-VEGF were not found to be associated with a significantly higher risk of TRD (RR 2.64, 95% CI 0.34-20.30, p = 0.35). Due to the retrospective design of the included studies, the overall grade of evidence was deemed low.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Adjunctive anti-VEGF therapy may reduce the total treatment burden while achieving similar anatomical and functional outcomes. In addition, there appears to be no significant increase in the risk of TRD. Judicious use of anti-VEGF may be a useful therapy to consider in patients with Coats disease requiring ablative therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":54486,"journal":{"name":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Retina-The Journal of Retinal and Vitreous Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/IAE.0000000000005008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy combined with standard ablative treatment in Coats disease.
Methods: A search of PubMed, Embase, and SCOPUS was conducted to identify studies comparing ablative therapy alone versus ablative therapy with anti-VEGF for Coats disease. Five studies (136 eyes treated with ablation alone and 82 with combination therapy) were included. Data on treatment sessions, quiescence, visual acuity (VA) and tractional retinal detachment (TRD) were extracted.
Results: Adjunctive anti-VEGF significantly reduced the treatment sessions required to achieve quiescence (Mean difference [MD] 0.47 sessions, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10-0.85, p = 0.01). No significant difference was found in anatomic outcomes with both groups having a similar number of eyes which resulted in phthisis. No significant difference was found in the BCVA at final follow up (MD = 0.20, 95% CI -0.20 to 0.59, p = 0.33) without significant heterogeneity (I2 =23%, p = 0.28). Eyes with adjunctive anti-VEGF were not found to be associated with a significantly higher risk of TRD (RR 2.64, 95% CI 0.34-20.30, p = 0.35). Due to the retrospective design of the included studies, the overall grade of evidence was deemed low.
Conclusions: Adjunctive anti-VEGF therapy may reduce the total treatment burden while achieving similar anatomical and functional outcomes. In addition, there appears to be no significant increase in the risk of TRD. Judicious use of anti-VEGF may be a useful therapy to consider in patients with Coats disease requiring ablative therapy.
目的:评价玻璃体内抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)辅助治疗联合标准消融治疗Coats病的疗效和安全性。方法:检索PubMed, Embase和SCOPUS,以确定比较单独消融治疗与抗vegf消融治疗Coats病的研究。纳入了5项研究(136只眼单独消融治疗和82只眼联合治疗)。提取治疗时间、静息、视力(VA)和牵引性视网膜脱离(TRD)的数据。结果:辅助抗vegf显著减少了达到静止所需的治疗时间(平均差[MD] 0.47个疗程,95%可信区间[CI] 0.10-0.85, p = 0.01)。两组因眼数相近而导致肺结核的解剖结果无显著差异。最终随访时BCVA无显著差异(MD = 0.20, 95% CI -0.20 ~ 0.59, p = 0.33),且无显著异质性(I2 =23%, p = 0.28)。辅助抗vegf的眼睛与TRD的风险没有明显的相关性(RR 2.64, 95% CI 0.34-20.30, p = 0.35)。由于纳入的研究采用回顾性设计,证据的总体等级被认为较低。结论:辅助抗vegf治疗可减轻总治疗负担,同时获得相似的解剖和功能结果。此外,TRD的风险似乎没有显著增加。对于需要消融治疗的Coats病患者,明智地使用抗vegf可能是一种有用的治疗方法。
期刊介绍:
RETINA® focuses exclusively on the growing specialty of vitreoretinal disorders. The Journal provides current information on diagnostic and therapeutic techniques. Its highly specialized and informative, peer-reviewed articles are easily applicable to clinical practice.
In addition to regular reports from clinical and basic science investigators, RETINA® publishes special features including periodic review articles on pertinent topics, special articles dealing with surgical and other therapeutic techniques, and abstract cards. Issues are abundantly illustrated in vivid full color.
Published 12 times per year, RETINA® is truly a “must have” publication for anyone connected to this field.