Not Your Mama's Ideology (But Close): Modest Generational Differences in Ideological Alignment in Postcommunist Europe.

IF 4.6 1区 社会学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Public Opinion Quarterly Pub Date : 2026-06-29 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/poq/nfag041
Lenka Hrbková, Tadeas Cely, Matej Jungwirth
{"title":"Not Your Mama's Ideology (But Close): Modest Generational Differences in Ideological Alignment in Postcommunist Europe.","authors":"Lenka Hrbková, Tadeas Cely, Matej Jungwirth","doi":"10.1093/poq/nfag041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines whether generational change in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is associated with shifts in how political attitudes align along the conventional economic-cultural left-right dimension. Because cohorts in the region were socialized under different political-economic systems, CEE provides a setting to assess whether younger generations display patterns of attitude alignment that differ from those of older cohorts. Using pooled European Social Survey data (2004-2023) and original surveys from Czechia, Hungary, and Lithuania, we combine an age-period-cohort analysis of left-right alignment with a network analysis of associations among thirteen salient issues. We find modest generational differences in the early 2000s, but these diminish over time, with all cohorts exhibiting similarly low levels of left-right alignment. Economic and cultural attitudes remain weakly connected, and EU- and foreign-policy issues often form separate clusters. The findings indicate that generational replacement has not produced a shift toward a more conventional left-right organization of belief systems in the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":51359,"journal":{"name":"Public Opinion Quarterly","volume":"90 SI","pages":"1084-1113"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13553006/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Opinion Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfag041","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines whether generational change in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) is associated with shifts in how political attitudes align along the conventional economic-cultural left-right dimension. Because cohorts in the region were socialized under different political-economic systems, CEE provides a setting to assess whether younger generations display patterns of attitude alignment that differ from those of older cohorts. Using pooled European Social Survey data (2004-2023) and original surveys from Czechia, Hungary, and Lithuania, we combine an age-period-cohort analysis of left-right alignment with a network analysis of associations among thirteen salient issues. We find modest generational differences in the early 2000s, but these diminish over time, with all cohorts exhibiting similarly low levels of left-right alignment. Economic and cultural attitudes remain weakly connected, and EU- and foreign-policy issues often form separate clusters. The findings indicate that generational replacement has not produced a shift toward a more conventional left-right organization of belief systems in the region.

不是你妈妈的意识形态(但接近):后共产主义欧洲意识形态结盟的适度代际差异。
本文研究了中欧和东欧(CEE)的代际变化是否与政治态度如何与传统经济-文化左右维度相一致的转变有关。由于该地区的人群是在不同的政治经济制度下社会化的,因此中东欧提供了一个环境来评估年轻一代是否表现出与年长人群不同的态度一致模式。利用欧洲社会调查数据(2004-2023)和来自捷克、匈牙利和立陶宛的原始调查,我们将左右对齐的年龄-时期队列分析与13个突出问题之间关联的网络分析相结合。我们在21世纪初发现了适度的代际差异,但随着时间的推移,这些差异会逐渐消失,所有的人群都表现出类似的低水平的左右对齐。经济和文化态度之间的联系仍然很弱,欧盟和外交政策问题往往形成不同的集群。研究结果表明,代际更替并没有使该地区的信仰体系向更传统的左右组织转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
2.90%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: Published since 1937, Public Opinion Quarterly is among the most frequently cited journals of its kind. Such interdisciplinary leadership benefits academicians and all social science researchers by providing a trusted source for a wide range of high quality research. POQ selectively publishes important theoretical contributions to opinion and communication research, analyses of current public opinion, and investigations of methodological issues involved in survey validity—including questionnaire construction, interviewing and interviewers, sampling strategy, and mode of administration. The theoretical and methodological advances detailed in pages of POQ ensure its importance as a research resource.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书