Implementation outcomes of a dementia-focused intervention for family care partners and clinicians in home hospice care.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Danielle H Llaneza, Kira G Sheldon, Margaret McDonald, Elizabeth A Luth
{"title":"Implementation outcomes of a dementia-focused intervention for family care partners and clinicians in home hospice care.","authors":"Danielle H Llaneza, Kira G Sheldon, Margaret McDonald, Elizabeth A Luth","doi":"10.1017/S1478951526103538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>End-of-life care for persons living with dementia in home hospice relies heavily on coordination between family care partners (FCPs) and clinicians (e.g., hospice social workers and nurses). FCPs and clinicians have reported support and knowledge gaps in end-of-life dementia care. Interventions are needed to improve FCPs' support and clinicians' educational gaps.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A pilot randomized controlled trial was designed to examine implementation outcomes for a dementia-focused end-of-life intervention for FCPs (<i>n</i> = 37) and clinicians (<i>n</i> = 15). Data on survey completion and acceptability were collected at baseline, during 4 follow-up visits, and at the conclusion of the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-eight (75%) caregivers completed the post-study survey, and 10 (27%) reported using the structured worksheet. Thirteen (87%) clinicians completed the post-training survey, 8 (53%) completed the post-study survey, and 8 (100%) used the worksheet. Clinicians (<i>n</i> = 8) were satisfied or highly satisfied with the instructional videos, and half (50%) used the information frequently with patients. Both groups reported the worksheet helpful, easy to use, and satisfactory, though clinicians rated helpfulness slightly higher (mean = 3.88 vs. 3.70 for FCPs). Clinicians liked the worksheet's structured guidance and the enhanced collaboration.</p><p><strong>Significance of results: </strong>This study provides preliminary evidence for implementation outcomes of a dementia-focused end-of-life intervention in home hospice. Findings suggest the intervention can be implemented in a hospice setting, with moderate worksheet uptake and perceived value among FCPs and clinicians.</p>","PeriodicalId":47898,"journal":{"name":"Palliative & Supportive Care","volume":"24 ","pages":"e215"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Palliative & Supportive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951526103538","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: End-of-life care for persons living with dementia in home hospice relies heavily on coordination between family care partners (FCPs) and clinicians (e.g., hospice social workers and nurses). FCPs and clinicians have reported support and knowledge gaps in end-of-life dementia care. Interventions are needed to improve FCPs' support and clinicians' educational gaps.

Methods: A pilot randomized controlled trial was designed to examine implementation outcomes for a dementia-focused end-of-life intervention for FCPs (n = 37) and clinicians (n = 15). Data on survey completion and acceptability were collected at baseline, during 4 follow-up visits, and at the conclusion of the study.

Results: Twenty-eight (75%) caregivers completed the post-study survey, and 10 (27%) reported using the structured worksheet. Thirteen (87%) clinicians completed the post-training survey, 8 (53%) completed the post-study survey, and 8 (100%) used the worksheet. Clinicians (n = 8) were satisfied or highly satisfied with the instructional videos, and half (50%) used the information frequently with patients. Both groups reported the worksheet helpful, easy to use, and satisfactory, though clinicians rated helpfulness slightly higher (mean = 3.88 vs. 3.70 for FCPs). Clinicians liked the worksheet's structured guidance and the enhanced collaboration.

Significance of results: This study provides preliminary evidence for implementation outcomes of a dementia-focused end-of-life intervention in home hospice. Findings suggest the intervention can be implemented in a hospice setting, with moderate worksheet uptake and perceived value among FCPs and clinicians.

在家庭安宁疗护中,以失智症为重点的家庭疗护伙伴与临床医师干预的实施结果。
目的:在家庭安宁疗护中对痴呆症患者的临终关怀在很大程度上依赖于家庭疗护伙伴(fcp)和临床医生(如安宁疗护社工和护士)之间的协调。fcp和临床医生报告了临终痴呆护理方面的支持和知识差距。需要采取干预措施来改善fcp的支持和临床医生的教育差距。方法:设计一项随机对照试验,检查fcp (n = 37)和临床医生(n = 15)以痴呆症为重点的临终干预的实施结果。在基线、4次随访和研究结束时收集调查完成度和可接受性的数据。结果:28名(75%)护理人员完成了研究后调查,10名(27%)报告使用了结构化工作表。13名(87%)临床医生完成了培训后调查,8名(53%)完成了学习后调查,8名(100%)使用了工作表。临床医生(n = 8)对教学视频感到满意或高度满意,一半(50%)的医生经常与患者一起使用这些信息。两组都报告工作表有用,易于使用,令人满意,尽管临床医生对有用性的评价略高(平均= 3.88 vs. fcp为3.70)。临床医生喜欢工作表的结构化指导和增强的协作。结果的意义:本研究为居家安宁疗护中以失智症为焦点的临终干预的实施结果提供初步证据。研究结果表明,干预措施可以在安宁疗护环境中实施,在fcp和临床医生中具有适度的工作表摄取和感知价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Palliative & Supportive Care
Palliative & Supportive Care HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
280
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书