Assessment of bioethics education, ethical awareness, and training needs among physicians in Jordan.

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Global Bioethics Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1080/11287462.2026.2728769
Hisham E Hasan, Omar F Khabour
{"title":"Assessment of bioethics education, ethical awareness, and training needs among physicians in Jordan.","authors":"Hisham E Hasan, Omar F Khabour","doi":"10.1080/11287462.2026.2728769","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Teaching bioethics contributes to promoting sound clinical decisions, but a research gap persists in Jordan regarding the ethical challenges facing physicians and their training requirements. This cross-sectional online survey assessed bioethics education, ethical awareness, perceived competence, and ethical practices among physicians practicing in Jordan. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed using convenience sampling through social media, professional networks, and medical associations. A total of 559 physicians participated. Most respondents were male (59.4%), aged 26-30 years (47.8%), and medical graduates from Jordan (83.5%). Although 64.2% reported at least 3 credit hours of ethics education, only 45.3% reported awareness of the four core bioethical principles. Most participants reported being able to identify ethical issues (83.5%) and to find answers to ethical dilemmas at least sometimes (84.4%). Ethical challenges were most often reported in relation to traditions and values (57.8%), law (53.1%), religion (52.6%), finance (51.7%), and conflict of interest (50.1%). Participants expressed strong interest in additional training, particularly treatment refusal, informed consent, diagnosis/prognosis communication, and end-of-life care. Findings suggest a need for practice-oriented, culturally grounded, and continuing bioethics education that links foundational principles to common clinical dilemmas. Education should develop case-based reasoning, reflective clinical judgment, and communication skills rather than terminology recognition alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":36835,"journal":{"name":"Global Bioethics","volume":"37 1","pages":"2728769"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13552296/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/11287462.2026.2728769","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Teaching bioethics contributes to promoting sound clinical decisions, but a research gap persists in Jordan regarding the ethical challenges facing physicians and their training requirements. This cross-sectional online survey assessed bioethics education, ethical awareness, perceived competence, and ethical practices among physicians practicing in Jordan. An anonymous questionnaire was distributed using convenience sampling through social media, professional networks, and medical associations. A total of 559 physicians participated. Most respondents were male (59.4%), aged 26-30 years (47.8%), and medical graduates from Jordan (83.5%). Although 64.2% reported at least 3 credit hours of ethics education, only 45.3% reported awareness of the four core bioethical principles. Most participants reported being able to identify ethical issues (83.5%) and to find answers to ethical dilemmas at least sometimes (84.4%). Ethical challenges were most often reported in relation to traditions and values (57.8%), law (53.1%), religion (52.6%), finance (51.7%), and conflict of interest (50.1%). Participants expressed strong interest in additional training, particularly treatment refusal, informed consent, diagnosis/prognosis communication, and end-of-life care. Findings suggest a need for practice-oriented, culturally grounded, and continuing bioethics education that links foundational principles to common clinical dilemmas. Education should develop case-based reasoning, reflective clinical judgment, and communication skills rather than terminology recognition alone.

评估约旦医生的生物伦理教育、伦理意识和培训需求。
教授生物伦理学有助于促进合理的临床决策,但约旦在医生面临的伦理挑战及其培训要求方面仍然存在研究差距。这项横断面在线调查评估了约旦执业医生的生物伦理教育、伦理意识、感知能力和伦理实践。采用方便抽样的方式,通过社交媒体、专业网络和医学协会发放匿名问卷。共有559名医生参与。大多数受访者为男性(59.4%),年龄在26-30岁之间(47.8%),来自约旦的医学毕业生(83.5%)。尽管64.2%的受访者表示接受过至少3个学时的伦理教育,但只有45.3%的受访者表示了解四项核心生物伦理原则。大多数参与者报告能够识别道德问题(83.5%),并至少有时能够找到道德困境的答案(84.4%)。伦理挑战最常与传统和价值观(57.8%)、法律(53.1%)、宗教(52.6%)、金融(51.7%)和利益冲突(50.1%)有关。参与者表达了对额外培训的强烈兴趣,特别是拒绝治疗、知情同意、诊断/预后沟通和临终关怀。研究结果表明,需要以实践为导向,以文化为基础和持续的生物伦理学教育,将基本原则与常见的临床困境联系起来。教育应该培养基于案例的推理、反思性临床判断和沟通技巧,而不仅仅是术语识别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Bioethics
Global Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
审稿时长
37 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书