David R Grimm, Dhiraj Pangal, Danyal Z Khan, Margaux Masson-Forsythe, Kaan Duman, Ayesha Syeda, Jack Cook, Peter H Hwang, Jayakar Nayak, Zara M Patel, Noel Ayoub, Robert Dodd, Juan Fernandez-Miranda, Daniel Donoho, Michael T Chang
{"title":"AI-Based Automated Instrument Tracking During Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery: A Pilot Feasibility Study.","authors":"David R Grimm, Dhiraj Pangal, Danyal Z Khan, Margaux Masson-Forsythe, Kaan Duman, Ayesha Syeda, Jack Cook, Peter H Hwang, Jayakar Nayak, Zara M Patel, Noel Ayoub, Robert Dodd, Juan Fernandez-Miranda, Daniel Donoho, Michael T Chang","doi":"10.1002/wjo2.70162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to skull base tumors are a technically challenging procedure for both surgeons and trainees. Artificial intelligence and computer vision (CV) may offer an objective analysis that provides surgical assessment on technique and enhanced educational feedback for surgeons of all levels.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing EEA from a tertiary care center between January 2022 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A large, publicly available CV model fine-tuned on endoscopic surgical video in collaboration with Surgical Data Science Collective (SDSC) was used for frame-by-frame detection of 14 different surgical instruments. Tool usage was depicted across different surgical phases of EEA. Dice-Sørensen Similarity Coefficients (DICE) were used to identify similarities between tool motion patterns across patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten patients (5 male, 5 female, ages 52.1 ± 13.8 years) were included, with over 35 h of video footage analyzed encompassing over 1.9 million individual frames. The sellar phase accounted for the majority of the analyzed frames. Within the sellar phase, the most frequently identified tools included suction (661,785), drill (138,031), Rhoton dissector (116,823), and cotton patties (105,038). Overall, DICE with higher frequency use exhibited substantially increased DICE scores: 0.52 for drill, 0.63 for Rhoton dissector, 0.67 for cotton patties, and 0.74 for suction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CV models reliably identified surgical instruments and can be used to capture both high-frequency patterns and deviations from common patterns in instrument usage across cases of endoscopic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":32097,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551076/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wjo2.70162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Endoscopic endonasal approaches (EEA) to skull base tumors are a technically challenging procedure for both surgeons and trainees. Artificial intelligence and computer vision (CV) may offer an objective analysis that provides surgical assessment on technique and enhanced educational feedback for surgeons of all levels.
Methods: Patients undergoing EEA from a tertiary care center between January 2022 and January 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. A large, publicly available CV model fine-tuned on endoscopic surgical video in collaboration with Surgical Data Science Collective (SDSC) was used for frame-by-frame detection of 14 different surgical instruments. Tool usage was depicted across different surgical phases of EEA. Dice-Sørensen Similarity Coefficients (DICE) were used to identify similarities between tool motion patterns across patients.
Results: Ten patients (5 male, 5 female, ages 52.1 ± 13.8 years) were included, with over 35 h of video footage analyzed encompassing over 1.9 million individual frames. The sellar phase accounted for the majority of the analyzed frames. Within the sellar phase, the most frequently identified tools included suction (661,785), drill (138,031), Rhoton dissector (116,823), and cotton patties (105,038). Overall, DICE with higher frequency use exhibited substantially increased DICE scores: 0.52 for drill, 0.63 for Rhoton dissector, 0.67 for cotton patties, and 0.74 for suction.
Conclusion: CV models reliably identified surgical instruments and can be used to capture both high-frequency patterns and deviations from common patterns in instrument usage across cases of endoscopic surgery.
背景:颅底肿瘤的内镜内鼻入路(EEA)对外科医生和实习生来说都是一个技术上具有挑战性的手术。人工智能和计算机视觉(CV)可以提供客观的分析,为各级外科医生提供技术评估和增强的教育反馈。方法:回顾性分析2022年1月至2023年1月在某三级保健中心接受EEA治疗的患者。与外科数据科学集体(SDSC)合作,对内窥镜手术视频进行微调的大型公开可用CV模型用于逐帧检测14种不同的手术器械。工具的使用描述了不同的手术阶段的EEA。DICE - s ørensen相似系数(DICE)用于识别患者之间刀具运动模式的相似性。结果:纳入10例患者(男5例,女5例,年龄52.1±13.8岁),分析了超过35小时的视频片段,包括190多万帧。卖方阶段占分析框架的大部分。在销售阶段,最常见的工具包括吸盘(661,785)、钻头(138,031)、Rhoton解剖器(116,823)和棉签(105,038)。总体而言,使用频率较高的DICE表现出显著提高的DICE得分:钻头0.52,Rhoton解剖器0.63,棉签0.67,吸盘0.74。结论:CV模型可靠地识别了手术器械,并可用于捕获内镜手术病例中器械使用的高频模式和常见模式的偏差。