3D Bioprinting Approaches for Dental Pulp Regeneration: A Scoping Review.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q2 CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING
Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Vinita Dsouza, Elstin Anbu Raj S, Raviraja N Seetharam, Shashi Rashmi Acharya, Kirthanashri S Vasanthan
{"title":"3D Bioprinting Approaches for Dental Pulp Regeneration: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Arun Mayya, Akshatha Chatra, Vinita Dsouza, Elstin Anbu Raj S, Raviraja N Seetharam, Shashi Rashmi Acharya, Kirthanashri S Vasanthan","doi":"10.1177/19373368261485519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising strategy for engineering biomimetic constructs capable of supporting regeneration of the dental pulp-dentin complex. However, the rapidly expanding literature is methodologically heterogeneous and difficult to synthesize. This scoping review aimed to map the current evidence on cell-laden 3D bioprinting approaches relevant to dental pulp regeneration, focusing on bioink composition, cellular components, printing modalities, experimental models, and reported regenerative outcomes. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception to December 2025. Following screening of 143 records and assessment of 23 full-text articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were preclinical investigations published between 2018 and 2026. Extrusion-based bioprinting was the most frequently used modality, followed by digital light processing systems. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) was the predominant bioink base and was commonly combined with collagen, hyaluronic acid, fibrin, or dentin-derived extracellular matrix components. Human dental pulp stem cells were the most frequently used cell source, often cocultured with endothelial cells to promote vascularization. Most studies evaluated cell viability, printability, and odontogenic differentiation, whereas angiogenic outcomes were less consistently assessed, and neurogenic outcomes were rarely investigated. Overall, cell-laden 3D bioprinted constructs demonstrate promising feasibility for supporting early regenerative processes relevant to dental pulp regeneration. However, substantial heterogeneity in bioink formulations, experimental models, and outcome reporting currently limits cross-study comparison and translational interpretation. Greater standardization of experimental reporting and the use of anatomically relevant models will be essential to advance the clinical translation of bioprinted constructs for regenerative endodontics.Impact Statement3D bioprinting enables spatially controlled deposition of cells and biomaterials, providing a promising strategy for engineering biomimetic constructs capable of regenerating the dental pulp-dentin complex. This scoping review synthesizes current preclinical evidence on cell-laden bioprinting approaches for dental pulp regeneration, including bioink formulations, cellular components, printing modalities, and experimental models. By mapping the existing evidence and identifying key gaps in vascularization strategies, neurogenic outcomes, and model relevance, this review highlights critical priorities for future research and provides a framework to guide the development and translational advancement of bioprinted constructs for regenerative endodontic therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":23134,"journal":{"name":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"19373368261485519"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19373368261485519","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL & TISSUE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting has emerged as a promising strategy for engineering biomimetic constructs capable of supporting regeneration of the dental pulp-dentin complex. However, the rapidly expanding literature is methodologically heterogeneous and difficult to synthesize. This scoping review aimed to map the current evidence on cell-laden 3D bioprinting approaches relevant to dental pulp regeneration, focusing on bioink composition, cellular components, printing modalities, experimental models, and reported regenerative outcomes. The review followed the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and was reported according to the PRISMA extension for scoping reviews. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus from database inception to December 2025. Following screening of 143 records and assessment of 23 full-text articles, 13 studies met the inclusion criteria. All included studies were preclinical investigations published between 2018 and 2026. Extrusion-based bioprinting was the most frequently used modality, followed by digital light processing systems. Gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) was the predominant bioink base and was commonly combined with collagen, hyaluronic acid, fibrin, or dentin-derived extracellular matrix components. Human dental pulp stem cells were the most frequently used cell source, often cocultured with endothelial cells to promote vascularization. Most studies evaluated cell viability, printability, and odontogenic differentiation, whereas angiogenic outcomes were less consistently assessed, and neurogenic outcomes were rarely investigated. Overall, cell-laden 3D bioprinted constructs demonstrate promising feasibility for supporting early regenerative processes relevant to dental pulp regeneration. However, substantial heterogeneity in bioink formulations, experimental models, and outcome reporting currently limits cross-study comparison and translational interpretation. Greater standardization of experimental reporting and the use of anatomically relevant models will be essential to advance the clinical translation of bioprinted constructs for regenerative endodontics.Impact Statement3D bioprinting enables spatially controlled deposition of cells and biomaterials, providing a promising strategy for engineering biomimetic constructs capable of regenerating the dental pulp-dentin complex. This scoping review synthesizes current preclinical evidence on cell-laden bioprinting approaches for dental pulp regeneration, including bioink formulations, cellular components, printing modalities, and experimental models. By mapping the existing evidence and identifying key gaps in vascularization strategies, neurogenic outcomes, and model relevance, this review highlights critical priorities for future research and provides a framework to guide the development and translational advancement of bioprinted constructs for regenerative endodontic therapies.

牙髓再生的3D生物打印方法:范围综述。
三维(3D)生物打印已经成为一种有前途的工程仿生结构策略,能够支持牙髓-牙本质复合体的再生。然而,迅速扩大的文献在方法上是异质的,难以综合。本综述旨在绘制当前与牙髓再生相关的细胞负载3D生物打印方法的证据,重点关注生物墨水组成、细胞成分、打印方式、实验模型和报道的再生结果。审查遵循乔安娜布里格斯研究所的方法,并根据PRISMA扩展范围审查进行报告。从数据库建立到2025年12月,在PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus中进行了电子检索。通过对143份记录的筛选和对23篇全文文章的评估,有13项研究符合纳入标准。所有纳入的研究都是2018年至2026年间发表的临床前研究。基于挤压的生物打印是最常用的方式,其次是数字光处理系统。明胶甲基丙烯酰(GelMA)是主要的生物墨水碱,通常与胶原蛋白、透明质酸、纤维蛋白或牙本质来源的细胞外基质成分结合。人牙髓干细胞是最常用的细胞来源,常与内皮细胞共培养以促进血管形成。大多数研究评估细胞活力、可打印性和牙源性分化,而血管生成结果的评估不太一致,神经源性结果的研究很少。总的来说,细胞负载的3D生物打印结构在支持牙髓再生相关的早期再生过程中显示出有希望的可行性。然而,生物链接配方、实验模型和结果报告的实质性异质性目前限制了交叉研究比较和翻译解释。实验报告的更大标准化和解剖学相关模型的使用对于推进再生牙髓学生物打印结构的临床翻译至关重要。影响声明3d生物打印技术能够实现细胞和生物材料的空间控制沉积,为能够再生牙髓-牙本质复合体的工程仿生结构提供了一种有前途的策略。本综述综合了目前用于牙髓再生的细胞负载生物打印方法的临床前证据,包括生物墨水配方、细胞成分、打印方式和实验模型。通过绘制现有证据并确定血管化策略、神经源性结果和模型相关性方面的关键差距,本综述强调了未来研究的关键优先事项,并提供了指导再生牙髓治疗生物打印构建物的开发和转化进步的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews
Tissue Engineering. Part B, Reviews Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
1.60%
发文量
150
期刊介绍: Tissue Engineering Reviews (Part B) meets the urgent need for high-quality review articles by presenting critical literature overviews and systematic summaries of research within the field to assess the current standing and future directions within relevant areas and technologies. Part B publishes bi-monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书