{"title":"A lifespan perspective on stress and happiness: a qualitative metaphor analysis of young and older adults.","authors":"Kamile Öner","doi":"10.1186/s40359-026-05304-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study examines the metaphorical perceptions of 'stress' and 'happiness' among older and younger individuals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The sample consisted of 367 participants (185 young adults and 182 older adults). Data were collected through a structured form including sociodemographic questions and open-ended prompts (e.g., \"Stress is like… because…\"; \"Happiness is like… because…\"). Metaphors were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify recurring thematic patterns.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among older individuals, the most frequently used metaphors for stress were illness, loneliness, and pain, while metaphors for happiness included health, family, money, and prayer. In contrast, younger individuals most commonly associated stress with illness, sadness, anxiety, and fear, whereas happiness was metaphorically linked to chocolate, butterflies, and peace. The findings suggest that older individuals' metaphorical perceptions of stress and happiness tend to be more enduring and grounded in quality-of-life factors such as health, social ties, and spirituality. In contrast, younger individuals' perceptions tended to be more emotionally driven and shaped by personal, immediate life experiences.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study contributes to understanding subjective well-being through age-related differences and provides implications for the development of age-appropriate psychological interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13556026/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05304-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: This study examines the metaphorical perceptions of 'stress' and 'happiness' among older and younger individuals.
Methods: The sample consisted of 367 participants (185 young adults and 182 older adults). Data were collected through a structured form including sociodemographic questions and open-ended prompts (e.g., "Stress is like… because…"; "Happiness is like… because…"). Metaphors were analyzed using qualitative content analysis to identify recurring thematic patterns.
Results: Among older individuals, the most frequently used metaphors for stress were illness, loneliness, and pain, while metaphors for happiness included health, family, money, and prayer. In contrast, younger individuals most commonly associated stress with illness, sadness, anxiety, and fear, whereas happiness was metaphorically linked to chocolate, butterflies, and peace. The findings suggest that older individuals' metaphorical perceptions of stress and happiness tend to be more enduring and grounded in quality-of-life factors such as health, social ties, and spirituality. In contrast, younger individuals' perceptions tended to be more emotionally driven and shaped by personal, immediate life experiences.
Conclusions: This study contributes to understanding subjective well-being through age-related differences and provides implications for the development of age-appropriate psychological interventions.
期刊介绍:
BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.