Modeling the Associations Between Personality, Cognition, and Social Determinants in Relation to Substance Use Disorder Severity in Community Adults.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Rickie Miglin, Naomi Sadeh
{"title":"Modeling the Associations Between Personality, Cognition, and Social Determinants in Relation to Substance Use Disorder Severity in Community Adults.","authors":"Rickie Miglin, Naomi Sadeh","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2026.2689088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop more effective intervention strategies for substance use disorder (SUD), it is essential to create models that evaluate the relative influence of various risk factors. This study constructed an integrated biopsychosocial model to examine the associations of different risk vulnerability domains with SUD severity.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>251 community adults aged 18-55 (female = 48.2%; White = 64.1%, Black = 26.7%, Asian American = 8.0%, American Indian/Alaska Native = 2.0%, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander = 1.6%, Hispanic =7.6%), completed clinical diagnostic interviews, neuropsychological testing, behavioral tasks, and surveys to assess SUD severity and an array of risk factors. We created latent variables to represent Disordered Personality, Cognitive Ability, and Social Determinant domains expected to contribute to SUD severity. We used structural equation modeling to model the cross-sectional associations of SUD severity with the latent variables (Disordered Personality, Cognitive Ability, and Social Determinant) and Delay Discounting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>An integrated model showed that Social Determinants (<i>β</i> = 0.77, z-test = 6.06, <i>p</i> < 0.001; 95% CI [0.72, 0.82]), Disordered Personality (<i>β</i> = 0.17, z-test = 2.23, <i>p</i> = 0.026; 95% CI [0.05, 0.29]) and Delay Discounting (<i>β</i> = 0.16, z-test = 3.13, <i>p</i> = 0.002; 95% CI [0.04, 0.28]) explained variance in SUD severity. In contrast, Cognitive Ability was not associated with SUD severity in the integrated model (<i>β</i> = 0.18, z-test = 1.56, <i>p</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These cross-sectional findings support biopsychosocial models of SUD and underscore the role of social determinant risk factors in understanding SUD severity. Further research is needed to refine these models for improved assessment and treatment strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13678649/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2026.2689088","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop more effective intervention strategies for substance use disorder (SUD), it is essential to create models that evaluate the relative influence of various risk factors. This study constructed an integrated biopsychosocial model to examine the associations of different risk vulnerability domains with SUD severity.

Method: 251 community adults aged 18-55 (female = 48.2%; White = 64.1%, Black = 26.7%, Asian American = 8.0%, American Indian/Alaska Native = 2.0%, Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander = 1.6%, Hispanic =7.6%), completed clinical diagnostic interviews, neuropsychological testing, behavioral tasks, and surveys to assess SUD severity and an array of risk factors. We created latent variables to represent Disordered Personality, Cognitive Ability, and Social Determinant domains expected to contribute to SUD severity. We used structural equation modeling to model the cross-sectional associations of SUD severity with the latent variables (Disordered Personality, Cognitive Ability, and Social Determinant) and Delay Discounting.

Results: An integrated model showed that Social Determinants (β = 0.77, z-test = 6.06, p < 0.001; 95% CI [0.72, 0.82]), Disordered Personality (β = 0.17, z-test = 2.23, p = 0.026; 95% CI [0.05, 0.29]) and Delay Discounting (β = 0.16, z-test = 3.13, p = 0.002; 95% CI [0.04, 0.28]) explained variance in SUD severity. In contrast, Cognitive Ability was not associated with SUD severity in the integrated model (β = 0.18, z-test = 1.56, p > 0.05).

Conclusions: These cross-sectional findings support biopsychosocial models of SUD and underscore the role of social determinant risk factors in understanding SUD severity. Further research is needed to refine these models for improved assessment and treatment strategies.

社区成人物质使用障碍严重程度的人格、认知和社会决定因素之间的关联建模。
目的:为制定更有效的药物使用障碍(SUD)干预策略,有必要建立评估各种危险因素相对影响的模型。本研究构建了一个综合的生物-心理-社会模型来检验不同风险脆弱域与SUD严重程度的关系。方法:251名18-55岁的社区成年人(女性= 48.2%,白人= 64.1%,黑人= 26.7%,亚裔美国人= 8.0%,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民= 2.0%,夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民= 1.6%,西班牙裔=7.6%)完成临床诊断访谈、神经心理测试、行为任务和调查,以评估SUD的严重程度和一系列危险因素。我们创造了潜在变量来代表人格障碍、认知能力和社会决定因素领域,这些领域有望促进SUD的严重程度。我们使用结构方程模型来模拟SUD严重程度与潜在变量(人格障碍、认知能力和社会决定因素)和延迟折扣的横断面关联。结果:综合模型显示,社会决定因素(β = 0.77, z-test = 6.06, p β = 0.17, z-test = 2.23, p = 0.026; 95% CI[0.05, 0.29])和延迟折扣(β = 0.16, z-test = 3.13, p = 0.002; 95% CI[0.04, 0.28])解释了SUD严重程度的差异。在综合模型中,认知能力与SUD严重程度无相关性(β = 0.18, z检验= 1.56,p < 0.05)。结论:这些横断面研究结果支持了SUD的生物心理社会模型,并强调了社会决定性风险因素在理解SUD严重程度中的作用。需要进一步的研究来完善这些模型,以改进评估和治疗策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书