Neonatal Pain Assessment and Management During Blood Sampling in Maternity Units.

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Jenni Kipinä, Taru Mäkelä, Heli Kerimaa, Mariaana Mäki-Asiala, Mervi Hakala, Anna-Kaija Palomaa, Tarja Pölkki
{"title":"Neonatal Pain Assessment and Management During Blood Sampling in Maternity Units.","authors":"Jenni Kipinä, Taru Mäkelä, Heli Kerimaa, Mariaana Mäki-Asiala, Mervi Hakala, Anna-Kaija Palomaa, Tarja Pölkki","doi":"10.1016/j.pmn.2026.08.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To describe maternity staff's perceptions of neonatal pain assessment and management focused on the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods during blood sampling, and the background factors associated with these perceptions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study was conducted in maternity units at five Finnish university hospitals between August 2023 and February 2024. The data were collected using a 45-item electronic questionnaire distributed to maternity staff (N = 576), yielding 119 responses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Maternity staff considered the assessment of neonatal pain to be important, and most believed they could reliably assess neonatal pain. Most participants did not use a validated pain assessment scale. Crying and moaning were the most commonly observed indicators of pain, while facial expressions were noted less frequently. During blood sampling, neonates were most commonly offered their own fist, a finger, or a pacifier, and facilitated tucking emerged as a widely used nonpharmacological method for pain relief. Approximately half of the staff reported using kangaroo care and breastfeeding as methods to relieve neonatal pain. Staff participation in education and the availability of written guidelines were significantly associated with both neonatal pain assessment practices and the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This article highlights the importance of educating maternity staff and ensuring the availability of written guidelines to improve pain assessment and the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods for healthy neonates during painful procedures in maternity units.</p><p><strong>Clinical implications: </strong>Systematic pain assessment and the consistent use of nonpharmacological pain relief should be integrated into standard practice to ensure equitable care for all neonates.</p>","PeriodicalId":19959,"journal":{"name":"Pain Management Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Management Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmn.2026.08.010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To describe maternity staff's perceptions of neonatal pain assessment and management focused on the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods during blood sampling, and the background factors associated with these perceptions.

Design: A descriptive cross-sectional study.

Methods: The study was conducted in maternity units at five Finnish university hospitals between August 2023 and February 2024. The data were collected using a 45-item electronic questionnaire distributed to maternity staff (N = 576), yielding 119 responses.

Results: Maternity staff considered the assessment of neonatal pain to be important, and most believed they could reliably assess neonatal pain. Most participants did not use a validated pain assessment scale. Crying and moaning were the most commonly observed indicators of pain, while facial expressions were noted less frequently. During blood sampling, neonates were most commonly offered their own fist, a finger, or a pacifier, and facilitated tucking emerged as a widely used nonpharmacological method for pain relief. Approximately half of the staff reported using kangaroo care and breastfeeding as methods to relieve neonatal pain. Staff participation in education and the availability of written guidelines were significantly associated with both neonatal pain assessment practices and the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods.

Conclusions: This article highlights the importance of educating maternity staff and ensuring the availability of written guidelines to improve pain assessment and the use of nonpharmacological pain-relieving methods for healthy neonates during painful procedures in maternity units.

Clinical implications: Systematic pain assessment and the consistent use of nonpharmacological pain relief should be integrated into standard practice to ensure equitable care for all neonates.

产科病房采血期间新生儿疼痛评估和管理。
目的:描述产科人员对新生儿疼痛评估和管理的看法,重点是在采血过程中使用非药物缓解疼痛的方法,以及与这些看法相关的背景因素。设计:描述性横断面研究。方法:该研究于2023年8月至2024年2月在芬兰五所大学医院的产科进行。数据收集使用一份45项的电子问卷,分发给产科工作人员(N = 576),得到119份回复。结果:产科人员认为新生儿疼痛的评估是重要的,大多数人认为他们可以可靠地评估新生儿疼痛。大多数参与者没有使用有效的疼痛评估量表。哭泣和呻吟是最常见的疼痛指标,而面部表情则不太常见。在抽血过程中,最常见的是给新生儿自己的拳头、手指或奶嘴,方便地收纳成为一种广泛使用的缓解疼痛的非药物方法。大约一半的工作人员报告使用袋鼠式护理和母乳喂养作为减轻新生儿疼痛的方法。工作人员参与教育和书面指南的可得性与新生儿疼痛评估实践和非药物缓解疼痛方法的使用显著相关。结论:本文强调了教育产科工作人员和确保书面指南的可用性的重要性,以改善疼痛评估和使用非药物缓解方法的健康新生儿在产科单位的痛苦过程中。临床意义:系统的疼痛评估和非药物止痛的持续使用应纳入标准实践,以确保所有新生儿的公平护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pain Management Nursing
Pain Management Nursing 医学-护理
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.90%
发文量
187
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This peer-reviewed journal offers a unique focus on the realm of pain management as it applies to nursing. Original and review articles from experts in the field offer key insights in the areas of clinical practice, advocacy, education, administration, and research. Additional features include practice guidelines and pharmacology updates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书