Alexandra Boric, Ravi Dhawan, Nicole Semaan, Orr Shauly, Gabriela García Nores, Albert Losken
{"title":"Analysis of Essence Human Acellular Dermal Matrix Compared With Other Products in Prepectoral Direct-to-implant Reconstruction.","authors":"Alexandra Boric, Ravi Dhawan, Nicole Semaan, Orr Shauly, Gabriela García Nores, Albert Losken","doi":"10.1097/GOX.0000000000008065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are widely used in implant-based breast reconstruction, with outcomes potentially varying across human-derived products. With the availability of newer ADMs, this study compares outcomes among different ADMs used in direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively reviewed patients undergoing immediate prepectoral DTI at a single institution (February 2020-September 2025). We compared early postoperative outcomes (within 90 d) among 3 human ADM products (Essence, AlloDerm, and Cortiva). Analyses were performed per patient. Cohorts were compared using univariate tests; multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, radiation exposure, chemotherapy exposure, mastectomy type, and total resection weight.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 487 patients were included (Essence, n = 68; AlloDerm, n = 201; Cortiva, n = 218), with similar mean age across groups (~52-54 y). Mean implant size differed across cohorts (<i>P</i> = 0.044), with no significant adjusted pairwise differences. The Essence cohort had higher body mass index, more prior radiation and chemotherapy exposure, higher rates of smoking, and greater total resection weight than the other cohorts (all <i>P</i> ≤ 0.02). Overall noninfectious complication rates (13.2%, 13.9%, and 17.4%) and infection rates (11.8%, 11.0%, and 13.3%) were similar across Essence, AlloDerm, and Cortiva groups, respectively. Seroma, mastectomy skin necrosis, drain duration, and reconstructive failure did not differ significantly. On adjusted analysis, there were no significant differences among the cohorts for any modeled postoperative outcome.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Essence ADM demonstrates comparable safety and outcomes compared with other human ADMs for immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction despite its use in higher risk patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":20149,"journal":{"name":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","volume":"14 9","pages":"e8065"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13552827/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery Global Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GOX.0000000000008065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Acellular dermal matrices (ADMs) are widely used in implant-based breast reconstruction, with outcomes potentially varying across human-derived products. With the availability of newer ADMs, this study compares outcomes among different ADMs used in direct-to-implant (DTI) reconstruction.
Methods: We prospectively reviewed patients undergoing immediate prepectoral DTI at a single institution (February 2020-September 2025). We compared early postoperative outcomes (within 90 d) among 3 human ADM products (Essence, AlloDerm, and Cortiva). Analyses were performed per patient. Cohorts were compared using univariate tests; multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, radiation exposure, chemotherapy exposure, mastectomy type, and total resection weight.
Results: A total of 487 patients were included (Essence, n = 68; AlloDerm, n = 201; Cortiva, n = 218), with similar mean age across groups (~52-54 y). Mean implant size differed across cohorts (P = 0.044), with no significant adjusted pairwise differences. The Essence cohort had higher body mass index, more prior radiation and chemotherapy exposure, higher rates of smoking, and greater total resection weight than the other cohorts (all P ≤ 0.02). Overall noninfectious complication rates (13.2%, 13.9%, and 17.4%) and infection rates (11.8%, 11.0%, and 13.3%) were similar across Essence, AlloDerm, and Cortiva groups, respectively. Seroma, mastectomy skin necrosis, drain duration, and reconstructive failure did not differ significantly. On adjusted analysis, there were no significant differences among the cohorts for any modeled postoperative outcome.
Conclusions: Essence ADM demonstrates comparable safety and outcomes compared with other human ADMs for immediate prepectoral DTI reconstruction despite its use in higher risk patients.
期刊介绍:
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open is an open access, peer reviewed, international journal focusing on global plastic and reconstructive surgery.Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open publishes on all areas of plastic and reconstructive surgery, including basic science/experimental studies pertinent to the field and also clinical articles on such topics as: breast reconstruction, head and neck surgery, pediatric and craniofacial surgery, hand and microsurgery, wound healing, and cosmetic and aesthetic surgery. Clinical studies, experimental articles, ideas and innovations, and techniques and case reports are all welcome article types. Manuscript submission is open to all surgeons, researchers, and other health care providers world-wide who wish to communicate their research results on topics related to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Furthermore, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open, a complimentary journal to Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, provides an open access venue for the publication of those research studies sponsored by private and public funding agencies that require open access publication of study results. Its mission is to disseminate high quality, peer reviewed research in plastic and reconstructive surgery to the widest possible global audience, through an open access platform. As an open access journal, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open offers its content for free to any viewer. Authors of articles retain their copyright to the materials published. Additionally, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery—Global Open provides rapid review and publication of accepted papers.