Reflux in bronchiectasis: current evidence and clinical implications.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-07 DOI:10.1097/MCP.0000000000001309
Robert C Flowers, Shreya Chablaney, Ashwin Basavaraj
{"title":"Reflux in bronchiectasis: current evidence and clinical implications.","authors":"Robert C Flowers, Shreya Chablaney, Ashwin Basavaraj","doi":"10.1097/MCP.0000000000001309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>To describe the relationship between reflux and bronchiectasis and to appraise recent literature on reflux characterization, clinical outcomes, and management strategies in patients with bronchiectasis.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Reflux is common in bronchiectasis and has been linked to worse respiratory symptoms and quality of life, more exacerbations and healthcare use, lower lung function, and higher mortality. These associations are seen across several cohorts, but nearly all data are observational, use variable reflux definitions, and cannot determine whether reflux contributes to bronchiectasis progression or simply identifies patients with more severe disease. Proposed pathways include microaspiration-related airway injury, reflex-mediated cough amplification, and microbial dysbiosis. No randomized bronchiectasis-specific trial has shown improved respiratory outcomes with reflux-directed therapy, and acid suppression alone is unlikely to address nonacid reflux, microaspiration, cough-reflex pathways, or airway dysbiosis.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>In bronchiectasis, reflux should be separated into clinically relevant phenotypes, including typical gastroesophageal reflux disease, proximal or nonacid reflux, laryngopharyngeal symptoms, dysphagia, and aspiration. Management should be guided by the suspected reflux or aspiration pattern because acid suppression alone may not address airway-relevant reflux. Future studies should pair objective reflux and swallowing measures with bronchiectasis-specific outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":11090,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"575-581"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/MCP.0000000000001309","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: To describe the relationship between reflux and bronchiectasis and to appraise recent literature on reflux characterization, clinical outcomes, and management strategies in patients with bronchiectasis.

Recent findings: Reflux is common in bronchiectasis and has been linked to worse respiratory symptoms and quality of life, more exacerbations and healthcare use, lower lung function, and higher mortality. These associations are seen across several cohorts, but nearly all data are observational, use variable reflux definitions, and cannot determine whether reflux contributes to bronchiectasis progression or simply identifies patients with more severe disease. Proposed pathways include microaspiration-related airway injury, reflex-mediated cough amplification, and microbial dysbiosis. No randomized bronchiectasis-specific trial has shown improved respiratory outcomes with reflux-directed therapy, and acid suppression alone is unlikely to address nonacid reflux, microaspiration, cough-reflex pathways, or airway dysbiosis.

Summary: In bronchiectasis, reflux should be separated into clinically relevant phenotypes, including typical gastroesophageal reflux disease, proximal or nonacid reflux, laryngopharyngeal symptoms, dysphagia, and aspiration. Management should be guided by the suspected reflux or aspiration pattern because acid suppression alone may not address airway-relevant reflux. Future studies should pair objective reflux and swallowing measures with bronchiectasis-specific outcomes.

支气管扩张的反流:目前的证据和临床意义
综述的目的:描述反流和支气管扩张之间的关系,并评价最近关于支气管扩张患者反流特征、临床结果和治疗策略的文献。最近的研究发现:反流在支气管扩张症中很常见,并且与更严重的呼吸系统症状和生活质量、更多的恶化和医疗保健使用、更低的肺功能和更高的死亡率有关。这些关联在几个队列中都可以看到,但几乎所有的数据都是观察性的,使用可变的反流定义,不能确定反流是否有助于支气管扩张的进展,也不能简单地确定疾病更严重的患者。提出的途径包括微吸入相关气道损伤、反射性咳嗽放大和微生物生态失调。没有随机支气管扩张特异性试验显示反流定向治疗可改善呼吸结果,单独抑酸不太可能解决非酸反流、微吸、咳嗽反射通路或气道生态失调。总结:在支气管扩张中,反流应分为与临床相关的表型,包括典型的胃食管反流病、近端或非酸反流、咽喉症状、吞咽困难和误吸。治疗应以疑似反流或误吸模式为指导,因为单独抑酸可能无法解决与气道相关的反流。未来的研究应将客观反流和吞咽措施与支气管扩张特异性结果相结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine is a highly regarded journal offering insightful editorials and on-the-mark invited reviews, covering key subjects such as asthma; cystic fibrosis; infectious diseases; diseases of the pleura; and sleep and respiratory neurobiology. Published bimonthly, each issue of Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine introduces world renowned guest editors and internationally recognized academics within the pulmonary field, delivering a widespread selection of expert assessments on the latest developments from the most recent literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书