Beyond Dispersion: Density, Industry, and Political Fragmentation in the Geography of Regional Job Centers

IF 2.4 3区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Journal of Regional Science Pub Date : 2026-09-09 Epub Date: 2026-02-17 DOI:10.1111/jors.70058
Zakhary Mallett, Nicholas Wilsey
{"title":"Beyond Dispersion: Density, Industry, and Political Fragmentation in the Geography of Regional Job Centers","authors":"Zakhary Mallett,&nbsp;Nicholas Wilsey","doi":"10.1111/jors.70058","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Most research on the spatial organization of employment focuses on individual metropolitan areas, limiting insight into cross-regional and generalizable patterns. At the same time, recent studies often rely on broad indicators of employment dispersion—such as the share of urbanized land occupied by jobs—while methodological advances in identifying job centers have lagged. As a result, comparative analyses of regional employment geographies, particularly those focused on job center formation and dominance, remain scarce. Using block-level employment data, we adapt a spatial clustering model to identify job centers across the 100 most populous regions of the United States at three relative density thresholds. We then document variation in employment centralization and concentration across regions and density strata, and test—via regression models—how these patterns relate to metropolitan age, industry composition, and political fragmentation, serving as proxies for car orientation, agglomeration dynamics, and inter-municipal competition, respectively. Our findings show that professional services are strongly associated with dense employment clustering, health care tends to agglomerate at lower densities, and the regional prevalence of finance is linked to greater employment concentration and central business district (CBD) dominance. Additionally, denser regions tend to have fewer but more dominant job centers, and political fragmentation is associated with flatter job center hierarchies and weaker CBD primacy.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48059,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Regional Science","volume":"66 4","pages":"1005-1028"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Regional Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jors.70058","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/2/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most research on the spatial organization of employment focuses on individual metropolitan areas, limiting insight into cross-regional and generalizable patterns. At the same time, recent studies often rely on broad indicators of employment dispersion—such as the share of urbanized land occupied by jobs—while methodological advances in identifying job centers have lagged. As a result, comparative analyses of regional employment geographies, particularly those focused on job center formation and dominance, remain scarce. Using block-level employment data, we adapt a spatial clustering model to identify job centers across the 100 most populous regions of the United States at three relative density thresholds. We then document variation in employment centralization and concentration across regions and density strata, and test—via regression models—how these patterns relate to metropolitan age, industry composition, and political fragmentation, serving as proxies for car orientation, agglomeration dynamics, and inter-municipal competition, respectively. Our findings show that professional services are strongly associated with dense employment clustering, health care tends to agglomerate at lower densities, and the regional prevalence of finance is linked to greater employment concentration and central business district (CBD) dominance. Additionally, denser regions tend to have fewer but more dominant job centers, and political fragmentation is associated with flatter job center hierarchies and weaker CBD primacy.

超越分散:区域就业中心地理上的密度、工业和政治分裂
大多数关于就业空间组织的研究都集中在个别大都市地区,限制了对跨区域和一般模式的了解。与此同时,最近的研究往往依赖于就业分散的广泛指标——比如就业岗位占用的城市化土地份额——而在确定就业中心方面的方法进展却滞后。因此,对区域就业地理的比较分析,特别是对就业中心形成和主导地位的比较分析仍然很少。利用街区级就业数据,我们采用空间聚类模型在三个相对密度阈值下确定了美国100个人口最多地区的就业中心。然后,我们记录了不同地区和密度层的就业集中度和集中度的变化,并通过回归模型测试了这些模式与都市年龄、产业构成和政治分裂的关系,分别作为汽车导向、集聚动态和城市间竞争的代理。研究结果表明,专业服务与密集的就业集聚密切相关,医疗保健倾向于以较低的密度聚集,金融的区域流行与较高的就业集中度和中央商务区(CBD)的主导地位有关。此外,人口密集的地区往往有更少但更占主导地位的就业中心,政治分裂与更扁平的就业中心等级和更弱的CBD首要地位有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Regional Science (JRS) publishes original analytical research at the intersection of economics and quantitative geography. Since 1958, the JRS has published leading contributions to urban and regional thought including rigorous methodological contributions and seminal theoretical pieces. The JRS is one of the most highly cited journals in urban and regional research, planning, geography, and the environment. The JRS publishes work that advances our understanding of the geographic dimensions of urban and regional economies, human settlements, and policies related to cities and regions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书