Designing Railway Vibrations Isolation Barriers Using Frequency-Domain Numerical Modeling

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
A. V. Yablokov, A. S. Serdyukov, P. A. Dergach
{"title":"Designing Railway Vibrations Isolation Barriers Using Frequency-Domain Numerical Modeling","authors":"A. V. Yablokov,&nbsp;A. S. Serdyukov,&nbsp;P. A. Dergach","doi":"10.3103/S0747923926600207","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article presents the results of numerical modeling assessing the effectiveness of vibration barriers for protecting rail transport infrastructure elements, specifically tram tracks and subway tunnels, from vibrational impact. The study examines three types of structures: horizontal, vertical, and combined barriers made from stone wool, expanded polystyrene (EPS), and extruded polystyrene (XPS). The methodology is based on solving the elastodynamic equations in the frequency domain using a finite-difference scheme that accounts for the free surface and utilizes perfectly matched layers (PMLs). The results indicated that horizontal barriers are most effective when using XPS (up to 70% vibration reduction), but are susceptible to resonances at specific geometric dimensions. Vertical constructions exhibited a lower propensity for resonance phenomena, with an EPS vibration barrier demonstrating the potential for vibration reduction of up to 90%. Combined systems yielded the best performance, providing broadband protection (1–250 Hz) with an effectiveness of up to 97%. Key factors influencing effectiveness were identified as: material properties (durability, damping characteristics of stone wool, stiffness of XPS), geometry (width exceeding 0.6 m, depth exceeding 3 m), and frequency range. Practical recommendations include the use of horizontal barriers for high-frequency vibrations, vertical barriers for low-frequency vibrations, and combined structures for vibration protection across a broad frequency spectrum. The research opens prospects for the development of multilayered and nonstandard geometric solutions, as well as for conducting field tests.</p>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":"62 4","pages":"331 - 349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923926600207","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the results of numerical modeling assessing the effectiveness of vibration barriers for protecting rail transport infrastructure elements, specifically tram tracks and subway tunnels, from vibrational impact. The study examines three types of structures: horizontal, vertical, and combined barriers made from stone wool, expanded polystyrene (EPS), and extruded polystyrene (XPS). The methodology is based on solving the elastodynamic equations in the frequency domain using a finite-difference scheme that accounts for the free surface and utilizes perfectly matched layers (PMLs). The results indicated that horizontal barriers are most effective when using XPS (up to 70% vibration reduction), but are susceptible to resonances at specific geometric dimensions. Vertical constructions exhibited a lower propensity for resonance phenomena, with an EPS vibration barrier demonstrating the potential for vibration reduction of up to 90%. Combined systems yielded the best performance, providing broadband protection (1–250 Hz) with an effectiveness of up to 97%. Key factors influencing effectiveness were identified as: material properties (durability, damping characteristics of stone wool, stiffness of XPS), geometry (width exceeding 0.6 m, depth exceeding 3 m), and frequency range. Practical recommendations include the use of horizontal barriers for high-frequency vibrations, vertical barriers for low-frequency vibrations, and combined structures for vibration protection across a broad frequency spectrum. The research opens prospects for the development of multilayered and nonstandard geometric solutions, as well as for conducting field tests.

用频域数值模拟方法设计铁路隔振屏障
本文介绍了数值模拟的结果,评估了振动屏障对保护轨道交通基础设施构件(特别是有轨电车轨道和地铁隧道)免受振动冲击的有效性。该研究考察了三种类型的结构:水平、垂直和由石棉、膨胀聚苯乙烯(EPS)和挤压聚苯乙烯(XPS)制成的组合屏障。该方法基于在频率域中使用有限差分格式求解弹性动力学方程,该格式考虑了自由表面并利用了完全匹配层(pml)。结果表明,当使用XPS时,水平屏障最有效(最多可减少70%的振动),但在特定几何尺寸上容易产生共振。垂直结构显示出较低的共振现象倾向,EPS振动屏障显示出高达90%的减振潜力。组合系统产生了最佳性能,提供宽带保护(1-250 Hz),效率高达97%。影响有效性的关键因素确定为:材料性能(耐久性、石棉阻尼特性、XPS刚度)、几何形状(宽度超过0.6 m,深度超过3 m)和频率范围。实用的建议包括使用水平屏障来防止高频振动,使用垂直屏障来防止低频振动,以及使用组合结构来保护宽频谱的振动。该研究为多层和非标准几何解的发展以及进行现场测试开辟了前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismic Instruments
Seismic Instruments GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
44.40%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书