Analytical Review of Classifications of Soil Conditions and Response Spectra in Foreign Buiding Codes for Earthquake-Resistant Construction for Developing Standardization in the Russian Federation

IF 0.3 Q4 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS
O. V. Pavlenko
{"title":"Analytical Review of Classifications of Soil Conditions and Response Spectra in Foreign Buiding Codes for Earthquake-Resistant Construction for Developing Standardization in the Russian Federation","authors":"O. V. Pavlenko","doi":"10.3103/S0747923926600189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The article presents a brief overview of soil classifications and response spectra adopted in the building codes of the European Union and 15 other countries possessing seismically active regions, such as the United States, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, South Africa, Turkey, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, and China. The descriptions are based on regulatory documents, commentaries on standards, and scientific publications. The review indicated that classification of soil conditions and descriptions of response spectra in the Russian building codes SP14.13330.2018 significantly lag behind their foreign counterparts and do not provide necessary reliability of seismic motion assessments; also, an unreasonably wide range of <i>S</i>-wave velocities is defined for soils of category 2. To improve the situation, we suggest the following: (1) increase the number of soil categories in the building codes of Russian Federation to five main categories, including the category of soils with resonance properties, and two additional categories that require special investigations, and balance the ranges of <i>S</i>-wave velocities; (2) define two groups of response spectra for the main types of soils, for stronger and weaker earthquakes, as done in the Eurocodes; (3) include determination of predominant periods of vibrations of soil strata in studies of site conditions; (4) introduce corrections for topographic effects during construction in mountainous areas. These adjustments will not require substantial efforts, but will lead to a significant increase in the reliability of seismic motion assessments.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45174,"journal":{"name":"Seismic Instruments","volume":"62 4","pages":"291 - 321"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seismic Instruments","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S0747923926600189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents a brief overview of soil classifications and response spectra adopted in the building codes of the European Union and 15 other countries possessing seismically active regions, such as the United States, Japan, Australia and New Zealand, South Africa, Turkey, Iran, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan, Saudi Arabia, and China. The descriptions are based on regulatory documents, commentaries on standards, and scientific publications. The review indicated that classification of soil conditions and descriptions of response spectra in the Russian building codes SP14.13330.2018 significantly lag behind their foreign counterparts and do not provide necessary reliability of seismic motion assessments; also, an unreasonably wide range of S-wave velocities is defined for soils of category 2. To improve the situation, we suggest the following: (1) increase the number of soil categories in the building codes of Russian Federation to five main categories, including the category of soils with resonance properties, and two additional categories that require special investigations, and balance the ranges of S-wave velocities; (2) define two groups of response spectra for the main types of soils, for stronger and weaker earthquakes, as done in the Eurocodes; (3) include determination of predominant periods of vibrations of soil strata in studies of site conditions; (4) introduce corrections for topographic effects during construction in mountainous areas. These adjustments will not require substantial efforts, but will lead to a significant increase in the reliability of seismic motion assessments.

国外抗震建筑规范中土壤条件分类和反应谱分析综述,以促进俄罗斯联邦的标准化发展
本文简要介绍了欧盟和其他15个地震活跃地区国家(如美国、日本、澳大利亚和新西兰、南非、土耳其、伊朗、哈萨克斯坦、吉尔吉斯斯坦、亚美尼亚、阿塞拜疆、乌克兰、乌兹别克斯坦、沙特阿拉伯和中国)建筑规范中采用的土壤分类和反应谱。这些描述是基于规范性文件、标准评论和科学出版物。审查表明,俄罗斯建筑规范SP14.13330.2018中土壤条件的分类和反应谱的描述明显落后于国外同行,并且没有提供必要的地震运动评估可靠性;此外,对于第2类土壤,定义了一个不合理的宽的s波速度范围。为了改善这种情况,我们建议:(1)将俄罗斯联邦建筑规范中的土壤类别增加到5个主要类别,包括具有共振特性的土壤类别和另外两个需要特别调查的类别,并平衡s波速度的范围;(2)按照欧洲规范的规定,对主要类型的土壤,即强地震和弱地震,确定两组反应谱;(3)包括在场地条件研究中确定土壤地层的主要振动周期;(4)介绍山区施工时地形效应的修正。这些调整不需要付出很大的努力,但将显著提高地震运动评估的可靠性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Seismic Instruments
Seismic Instruments GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS-
自引率
44.40%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: Seismic Instruments is a journal devoted to the description of geophysical instruments used in seismic research. In addition to covering the actual instruments for registering seismic waves, substantial room is devoted to solving instrumental-methodological problems of geophysical monitoring, applying various methods that are used to search for earthquake precursors, to studying earthquake nucleation processes and to monitoring natural and technogenous processes. The description of the construction, working elements, and technical characteristics of the instruments, as well as some results of implementation of the instruments and interpretation of the results are given. Attention is paid to seismic monitoring data and earthquake catalog quality Analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书