RSV Bivalent Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Pregnancy and Protection Against RSV-Associated Illness in Infants

IF 17.1 1区 医学 Q1 PEDIATRICS
Rabab Batool, Ran Wang, Hala Obeid, Tobias R. Kollmann, Joanne M. Langley, Pascal M. Lavoie, Bahaa Abu-Raya
{"title":"RSV Bivalent Prefusion F Protein Vaccine in Pregnancy and Protection Against RSV-Associated Illness in Infants","authors":"Rabab Batool, Ran Wang, Hala Obeid, Tobias R. Kollmann, Joanne M. Langley, Pascal M. Lavoie, Bahaa Abu-Raya","doi":"10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.4074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bivalent prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) administered during pregnancy has demonstrated efficacy in protecting infants against early-life RSV disease in the pivotal clinical trial. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize real-world evidence on the effectiveness of RSVpreF in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, and Europe PMC were searched from January 1, 2020, through January 30, 2026. Study Selection A total of 1144 studies were initially identified. Eligible were nonrandomized studies reporting the effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine in pregnancy in the prevention of RSV-associated LRTI in infants. Data Extraction and Synthesis All studies were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted on RSV-associated outcomes among infants born to women who received RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy and infants born to unvaccinated women. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment and Sidik-Jonkman estimator. Vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization was calculated as (1 − OR) × 100% and assessed in infants from birth to age 3 months and from birth to 6 months, separately. The limited available data precluded meta-analysis of effectiveness against the secondary outcomes of RSV-associated emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, and death. Results A total of 7 studies were included, comprising 7112 infants, of whom 2684 were born to vaccinated mothers. The studies collected data from January 2024 through April 2025 from Argentina, the UK, and the US. Pooled vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization was 82% (95% CI, 81%-82%; 3 studies, 4397 participants; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0%) in infants from birth to 3 months and 78% (95% CI, 70%-84%; 6 studies, 3008 participants; <jats:italic toggle=\"yes\">I</jats:italic> <jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 18.7%) in infants from birth to 6 months, when mothers were vaccinated 14 days or more before delivery. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that postimplementation data support the effectiveness of RSVpreF in pregnancy for the prevention of RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization during the first 6 months of life. The results support the introduction of RSVpreF into routine antenatal immunization programs.","PeriodicalId":14683,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Pediatrics","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2026.4074","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance The respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) bivalent prefusion F protein vaccine (RSVpreF) administered during pregnancy has demonstrated efficacy in protecting infants against early-life RSV disease in the pivotal clinical trial. Objective To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize real-world evidence on the effectiveness of RSVpreF in preventing RSV-associated lower respiratory tract infection (LRTI) in infants. Data Sources PubMed, Scopus, and Europe PMC were searched from January 1, 2020, through January 30, 2026. Study Selection A total of 1144 studies were initially identified. Eligible were nonrandomized studies reporting the effectiveness of RSVpreF vaccine in pregnancy in the prevention of RSV-associated LRTI in infants. Data Extraction and Synthesis All studies were screened independently by 2 reviewers. Data were extracted on RSV-associated outcomes among infants born to women who received RSVpreF vaccination during pregnancy and infants born to unvaccinated women. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization. Odds ratios (ORs) were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis with the Hartung-Knapp adjustment and Sidik-Jonkman estimator. Vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization was calculated as (1 − OR) × 100% and assessed in infants from birth to age 3 months and from birth to 6 months, separately. The limited available data precluded meta-analysis of effectiveness against the secondary outcomes of RSV-associated emergency department visits, intensive care unit admissions, and death. Results A total of 7 studies were included, comprising 7112 infants, of whom 2684 were born to vaccinated mothers. The studies collected data from January 2024 through April 2025 from Argentina, the UK, and the US. Pooled vaccine effectiveness against RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization was 82% (95% CI, 81%-82%; 3 studies, 4397 participants; I 2 = 0%) in infants from birth to 3 months and 78% (95% CI, 70%-84%; 6 studies, 3008 participants; I 2 = 18.7%) in infants from birth to 6 months, when mothers were vaccinated 14 days or more before delivery. Conclusions and Relevance The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis suggest that postimplementation data support the effectiveness of RSVpreF in pregnancy for the prevention of RSV-associated LRTI hospitalization during the first 6 months of life. The results support the introduction of RSVpreF into routine antenatal immunization programs.
妊娠期RSV二价预融合F蛋白疫苗及对婴儿RSV相关疾病的保护
在一项关键的临床试验中,妊娠期间接种呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)二价预融合F蛋白疫苗(RSVpreF)已证明可保护婴儿免受早期RSV疾病的侵害。目的对RSVpreF预防婴幼儿rsv相关下呼吸道感染(LRTI)的有效性进行系统评价和meta分析。检索了2020年1月1日至2026年1月30日期间的PubMed、Scopus和Europe PMC。研究选择最初共确定了1144项研究。符合条件的非随机研究报告了妊娠期接种RSVpreF疫苗预防婴儿rsv相关下呼吸道感染的有效性。所有研究均由2位审稿人独立筛选。在妊娠期间接种RSVpreF疫苗的妇女所生的婴儿和未接种疫苗的妇女所生的婴儿中提取了rsv相关结局的数据。主要结局和测量主要结局是与rsv相关的LRTI住院。优势比(ORs)采用随机效应荟萃分析,采用Hartung-Knapp调整和Sidik-Jonkman估计量进行汇总。疫苗对rsv相关LRTI住院的有效性计算为(1−OR) × 100%,并分别对出生至3个月和出生至6个月的婴儿进行评估。有限的可用数据妨碍了对与rsv相关的急诊就诊、重症监护病房入院和死亡的次要结局的有效性进行meta分析。结果共纳入7项研究,包括7112名婴儿,其中2684名是由接种疫苗的母亲所生。这些研究收集了阿根廷、英国和美国从2024年1月到2025年4月的数据。出生至3个月的婴儿对rsv相关LRTI住院的总疫苗有效性为82% (95% CI, 81%-82%; 3项研究,4397名受试者;I 2 = 0%),而母亲在分娩前14天或更长时间接种疫苗的出生至6个月婴儿的总疫苗有效性为78% (95% CI, 70%-84%; 6项研究,3008名受试者;I 2 = 18.7%)。本系统综述和荟萃分析的结果表明,实施后的数据支持妊娠期RSVpreF预防出生后前6个月rsv相关下呼吸道感染住院的有效性。研究结果支持将RSVpreF纳入常规产前免疫规划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Pediatrics
JAMA Pediatrics PEDIATRICS-
CiteScore
31.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
357
期刊介绍: JAMA Pediatrics, the oldest continuously published pediatric journal in the US since 1911, is an international peer-reviewed publication and a part of the JAMA Network. Published weekly online and in 12 issues annually, it garners over 8.4 million article views and downloads yearly. All research articles become freely accessible online after 12 months without any author fees, and through the WHO's HINARI program, the online version is accessible to institutions in developing countries. With a focus on advancing the health of infants, children, and adolescents, JAMA Pediatrics serves as a platform for discussing crucial issues and policies in child and adolescent health care. Leveraging the latest technology, it ensures timely access to information for its readers worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书