Neuromodulation effects of HF-rTMS and rPMS on stroke patients: an fNIRS study.

IF 3.8
Zhenhua Song, Kai Wei, Huizi Zeng, Xiaoxuan Zhan, Qianqian Fan, Xiaojun Wang, Yanfang Sui, Binbin Li, Zhijie Zhao, Fengyan Liang
{"title":"Neuromodulation effects of HF-rTMS and rPMS on stroke patients: an fNIRS study.","authors":"Zhenhua Song, Kai Wei, Huizi Zeng, Xiaoxuan Zhan, Qianqian Fan, Xiaojun Wang, Yanfang Sui, Binbin Li, Zhijie Zhao, Fengyan Liang","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/aea36a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective.</i>This study aims to explore the immediate neuromodulatory effects of a single session of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) versus repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on cortical hemodynamics and functional connectivity (FC) in patients with stroke.<i>Approach.</i>57 patients with unilateral stroke at varying post-stroke durations received a single pulse-count-matched session of either HF-rTMS (5 Hz, 1500 pulses) or rPMS (25 Hz, 1500 pulses). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) monitored cortical hemodynamics during a motor task immediately before and after the intervention. The acute changes in oxyhemoglobin (HbO) response magnitude (root-mean-square (RMS)), response dispersion (Root-mean-square error (RMSE)), laterality index, and region-to-region FC were measured.<i>Main results.</i>Within-group analyses showed that HF-rTMS reduced task-evoked HbO RMS in selected frontal region of interest (ROI)s and reduced RMSE in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and frontopolar area (FPA), and showed an exploratory decrease in DLPFC-inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) FC and a descriptive negative laterality index tendency. Conversely, rPMS increased HbO RMS in the M1 ROI, which comprised M1 channels from both hemispheres, increased FPA RMSE, and showed an exploratory increase in S1-IFG FC with a descriptive positive laterality index tendency. No FC difference remained significant after false discovery rate correction. The disease-duration-adjusted FPA RMSE Time × Group interaction was significant (<i>F</i>(1,54) = 15.595,<i>p</i>< 0.001, partial<i>η</i><sup>2</sup>= 0.224) and remained significant after exclusion of the participant with an extreme post-stroke duration.<i>Significance.</i>This study provides fNIRS evidence that HF-rTMS and rPMS are associated with different acute cortical response profiles in stroke. By directly comparing central and peripheral magnetic stimulation under a pulse-count-matched design, it characterizes their differing associations with post-stroke cortical hemodynamics and network-level responses.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aea36a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective.This study aims to explore the immediate neuromodulatory effects of a single session of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HF-rTMS) versus repetitive peripheral magnetic stimulation (rPMS) on cortical hemodynamics and functional connectivity (FC) in patients with stroke.Approach.57 patients with unilateral stroke at varying post-stroke durations received a single pulse-count-matched session of either HF-rTMS (5 Hz, 1500 pulses) or rPMS (25 Hz, 1500 pulses). Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) monitored cortical hemodynamics during a motor task immediately before and after the intervention. The acute changes in oxyhemoglobin (HbO) response magnitude (root-mean-square (RMS)), response dispersion (Root-mean-square error (RMSE)), laterality index, and region-to-region FC were measured.Main results.Within-group analyses showed that HF-rTMS reduced task-evoked HbO RMS in selected frontal region of interest (ROI)s and reduced RMSE in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and frontopolar area (FPA), and showed an exploratory decrease in DLPFC-inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) FC and a descriptive negative laterality index tendency. Conversely, rPMS increased HbO RMS in the M1 ROI, which comprised M1 channels from both hemispheres, increased FPA RMSE, and showed an exploratory increase in S1-IFG FC with a descriptive positive laterality index tendency. No FC difference remained significant after false discovery rate correction. The disease-duration-adjusted FPA RMSE Time × Group interaction was significant (F(1,54) = 15.595,p< 0.001, partialη2= 0.224) and remained significant after exclusion of the participant with an extreme post-stroke duration.Significance.This study provides fNIRS evidence that HF-rTMS and rPMS are associated with different acute cortical response profiles in stroke. By directly comparing central and peripheral magnetic stimulation under a pulse-count-matched design, it characterizes their differing associations with post-stroke cortical hemodynamics and network-level responses.

HF-rTMS和rPMS对脑卒中患者的神经调节作用:一项fNIRS研究。
重复性经颅磁刺激(rTMS)和重复性外周磁刺激(rPMS)是脑卒中后运动恢复的有前途的神经调节技术,但它们的直接皮层反应尚不清楚。这项功能性近红外光谱(fNIRS)研究招募了57名慢性中风患者,他们接受了高频rTMS(5赫兹,1500脉冲在同脑M1上)或rPMS(25赫兹,1500脉冲在同脑Erb点上)。分析皮质血流动力学和网络特征,包括血红蛋白氧浓度(HbO)、激活水平(RMS)、反应离散度(RMSE)、侧偏指数(LI)和区域间功能连通性(FC)。临床记录显示,两组患者在住院期间均实现了显著的功能恢复,其中rTMS组总体获益更大。在此临床背景下,我们研究了单次刺激的即时神经机制。fNIRS显示了不同的神经调节模式。rTMS导致HbO振幅和多个额叶和体感区域的空间弥散减少,同时DLPFC-IFG功能连通性下降和LI移位,表明半球间平衡发生了变化。相比之下,rPMS增加了M1的激活,扩大了区域内的可变性,并选择性地加强了感觉运动-额叶耦联——特别是S1-IFG通路——同时将M1的侧向同侧半球转移。综上所述,这些发现指出了不同的机制:rTMS似乎以自上而下的方式调节皮质兴奋性,可能通过减弱非必要的额叶参与和精炼感觉运动动力学,而rPMS可能增强由本体感觉传入事件驱动的自下而上的促进。这些互补的神经调节特征提供了急性神经血管证据,可以指导卒中后康复中枢性和外周性磁刺激的策略选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书