Continuous sliding pressure feedback enhances supernumerary robotic thumb proprioception over discrete vibrotactile feedback: behavioral and EEG evidence.

IF 3.8
Haneen Alsuradi, Georgios Korres, Pi Ko, Joseph Hong, Mohamad Eid
{"title":"Continuous sliding pressure feedback enhances supernumerary robotic thumb proprioception over discrete vibrotactile feedback: behavioral and EEG evidence.","authors":"Haneen Alsuradi, Georgios Korres, Pi Ko, Joseph Hong, Mohamad Eid","doi":"10.1088/1741-2552/aea36f","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Supernumerary robotic thumbs (SRTs) offer promising augmentation capabilities, yet their adoption remains limited by the lack of reliable proprioceptive awareness, which is critical for enabling intuitive control and cognitive integration. Vibrotactile (VF) and pressure feedback (PF) represent two widely used modalities for proprioception that differ fundamentally in their encoding of information: VF feedback is widely adopted due to its low cost and ease of wearability, but provides discrete, temporally patterned cues, whereas PF is expensive and bulky yet it delivers continuous, analog signals that more closely resemble natural proprioceptive input.<i>Approach</i>. This study compares discrete VF and continuous sliding PF for conveying SRT proprioceptive information in the absence of visual input, combining behavioral assessment with electroencephalography. A total of 42 participants were recruited and assigned to either a VF or PF group; they wore the SRT, received modality-specific sensory feedback during passive finger movements, and were asked to decode the start and end location of the finger's motion. Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the alpha and beta bands and beta-band functional connectivity were analyzed to characterize cortical differences between modalities.<i>Main results</i>. Both modalities outperformed implicit feedback, with PF demonstrating superior accuracy compared to VF. VF elicited more sustained alpha-band ERD across both contralateral and ipsilateral sensorimotor cortices and sustained beta-band ERD in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex, suggesting prolonged cortical engagement and increased processing demand. PF elicited significantly higher beta-band small-worldness, indicating more efficient network-level integration of proprioceptive information.<i>Significance</i>. These findings demonstrate that continuous, analog feedback more effectively conveys proprioceptive information and sensorimotor integration than discrete, temporally encoded cues; informing the design of sensory augmentation systems that effectively integrate artificial limbs into the human body schema.</p>","PeriodicalId":94096,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neural engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neural engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2552/aea36f","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Supernumerary robotic thumbs (SRTs) offer promising augmentation capabilities, yet their adoption remains limited by the lack of reliable proprioceptive awareness, which is critical for enabling intuitive control and cognitive integration. Vibrotactile (VF) and pressure feedback (PF) represent two widely used modalities for proprioception that differ fundamentally in their encoding of information: VF feedback is widely adopted due to its low cost and ease of wearability, but provides discrete, temporally patterned cues, whereas PF is expensive and bulky yet it delivers continuous, analog signals that more closely resemble natural proprioceptive input.Approach. This study compares discrete VF and continuous sliding PF for conveying SRT proprioceptive information in the absence of visual input, combining behavioral assessment with electroencephalography. A total of 42 participants were recruited and assigned to either a VF or PF group; they wore the SRT, received modality-specific sensory feedback during passive finger movements, and were asked to decode the start and end location of the finger's motion. Sensorimotor event-related desynchronization (ERD) in the alpha and beta bands and beta-band functional connectivity were analyzed to characterize cortical differences between modalities.Main results. Both modalities outperformed implicit feedback, with PF demonstrating superior accuracy compared to VF. VF elicited more sustained alpha-band ERD across both contralateral and ipsilateral sensorimotor cortices and sustained beta-band ERD in the ipsilateral sensorimotor cortex, suggesting prolonged cortical engagement and increased processing demand. PF elicited significantly higher beta-band small-worldness, indicating more efficient network-level integration of proprioceptive information.Significance. These findings demonstrate that continuous, analog feedback more effectively conveys proprioceptive information and sensorimotor integration than discrete, temporally encoded cues; informing the design of sensory augmentation systems that effectively integrate artificial limbs into the human body schema.

连续滑动压力反馈比离散振动触觉反馈增强了多余的机器人拇指本体感觉:行为和脑电图证据。
目的:多余机器人拇指(srt)提供了有希望的增强能力,但由于缺乏可靠的本体感觉意识,它们的采用仍然受到限制,而本体感觉意识对于实现直观控制和认知整合至关重要。振动触觉和压力反馈代表了两种广泛使用的本体感受方式,它们在信息编码方面存在根本差异:振动触觉反馈因其低成本和易于穿戴而被广泛采用,但它提供了离散的、暂时的模式线索,而压力反馈既昂贵又笨重,但它提供了连续的模拟信号,更接近于自然本体感受输入。方法:本研究结合行为评估和脑电图,比较了离散振动触觉和连续滑动压力反馈在没有视觉输入的情况下传递SRT本体感觉信息的效果。总共招募了42名参与者,并将其分配到振动触觉组或压力反馈组;他们戴着SRT,在被动的手指运动中接受特定模式的感官反馈,并被要求解码手指运动的开始和结束位置。我们分析了感觉运动事件相关去同步(ERD)在α和β波段和β波段的功能连接,以表征不同模式的皮质差异。主要结果:两种方式都优于隐式反馈,与振动触觉反馈相比,压力反馈显示出更高的准确性。触觉振动反馈在对侧和同侧感觉运动皮层均诱发了持续的α带ERD,在同侧感觉运动皮层诱发了持续的β带ERD,表明皮层参与时间延长,加工需求增加。压力反馈显著提高了β -波段小世界性,表明本体感觉信息的网络级整合更有效。意义:这些发现表明,连续的模拟反馈比离散的、时间编码的线索更有效地支持本体感受信息和感觉运动整合;为感官增强系统的设计提供信息,有效地将假肢整合到人体图式中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书