Pharmacy Utilization Patterns and Polypharmacy as Predictors of High-Cost Workers' Compensation Claims: An Updated Cohort Study of Occupational Ankle Sprains.

IF 1.4
Xuguang Grant Tao, Marcos A Iglesias, Nimisha Kalia, Nina Leung, Judith Green-McKenzie, Robyn Satterfield, Edward J Bernacki
{"title":"Pharmacy Utilization Patterns and Polypharmacy as Predictors of High-Cost Workers' Compensation Claims: An Updated Cohort Study of Occupational Ankle Sprains.","authors":"Xuguang Grant Tao, Marcos A Iglesias, Nimisha Kalia, Nina Leung, Judith Green-McKenzie, Robyn Satterfield, Edward J Bernacki","doi":"10.1097/JOM.0000000000003875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evaluate pharmacy utilization patterns as independent predictors of high-cost workers' compensation claims (≥$50,000) for occupational ankle sprains.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pharmacy Benefit Management data were integrated into a 9-year cohort of 18,991 claims. Logistic regression modeled individual drug-class utilization and multi-class combinations, adjusting for demographics, industry, litigations, physical complications, treatments, and comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>High-cost risk increased significantly with individual utilization of opioids (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.78-2.69) and antiseizure medications (OR: 4.21; 95% CI: 3.28-5.39). While exclusive nonsteroidals use demonstrated no elevated risk (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.76-1.20), polypharmacy involving three or more flagged drug classes was associated with a 7.71-fold increase in cost escalation (CI: 6.08-9.77).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early multi-class prescription drug tracking provides a dynamic and real-time indicator of case complexity, allowing interventions from relevant parties to prevent severe financial escalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":94100,"journal":{"name":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of occupational and environmental medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000003875","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Evaluate pharmacy utilization patterns as independent predictors of high-cost workers' compensation claims (≥$50,000) for occupational ankle sprains.

Methods: Pharmacy Benefit Management data were integrated into a 9-year cohort of 18,991 claims. Logistic regression modeled individual drug-class utilization and multi-class combinations, adjusting for demographics, industry, litigations, physical complications, treatments, and comorbidities.

Results: High-cost risk increased significantly with individual utilization of opioids (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.78-2.69) and antiseizure medications (OR: 4.21; 95% CI: 3.28-5.39). While exclusive nonsteroidals use demonstrated no elevated risk (OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.76-1.20), polypharmacy involving three or more flagged drug classes was associated with a 7.71-fold increase in cost escalation (CI: 6.08-9.77).

Conclusions: Early multi-class prescription drug tracking provides a dynamic and real-time indicator of case complexity, allowing interventions from relevant parties to prevent severe financial escalation.

药物使用模式和多种药物作为高成本工人赔偿索赔的预测因子:职业性踝关节扭伤的最新队列研究。
目的:评估药房使用模式作为职业踝关节扭伤高成本工人赔偿索赔(≥50,000美元)的独立预测因素。方法:将药品福利管理数据整合到一个为期9年的18,991个索赔队列中。Logistic回归模拟了单个药物类别的使用和多药物类别的组合,调整了人口统计、行业、诉讼、身体并发症、治疗和合并症。结果:个体使用阿片类药物(OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 1.78-2.69)和抗癫痫药物(OR: 4.21; 95% CI: 3.28-5.39),高成本风险显著增加。虽然单独使用非甾体类药物没有增加风险(OR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.76-1.20),但涉及三种或更多标记药物类别的综合用药与成本增加7.71倍相关(CI: 6.08-9.77)。结论:早期多类处方药跟踪提供了一个动态的、实时的病例复杂性指标,允许相关方进行干预,防止严重的财务升级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书