Pre-Screening of Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Foot Ulcers for Enrollment into a Bacteriophage Therapy Pilot Study.

IF 1.5
Vijay Viswanathan, Geetha B Kumar, Indira Padmalayam, Satyavani Kumpatla, Udyama Dutta, Sindujha Prabakaran, Senthil Govindan, Kumar Ponnusamy, Sasikumar Thachinamurthy, Bamila Selvaraj, Menaka Rengaraj, Bharathi Anandkumar, Pradeesh Babu, Bipin G Nair
{"title":"Pre-Screening of Participants with Type 2 Diabetes and Foot Ulcers for Enrollment into a Bacteriophage Therapy Pilot Study.","authors":"Vijay Viswanathan, Geetha B Kumar, Indira Padmalayam, Satyavani Kumpatla, Udyama Dutta, Sindujha Prabakaran, Senthil Govindan, Kumar Ponnusamy, Sasikumar Thachinamurthy, Bamila Selvaraj, Menaka Rengaraj, Bharathi Anandkumar, Pradeesh Babu, Bipin G Nair","doi":"10.1177/15347346261486517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical severity and microbiological characteristics of participants with type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs) screened for eligibility into a bacteriophage therapy pilot study.Research Design And MethodsAdults aged (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and active DFUs presenting to a tertiary care centre were screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Ulcers were graded according to the University of Texas Diabetic Foot Classification System. Microbiological analysis included standard culture techniques and biochemical tests for identification of microorganism. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize ulcer severity, microbial patterns, and eligibility outcomes.ResultsA total of 595 individuals were screened. Grade 3 ulcers accounted for 51.1% of cases, followed by Grade 2 (29.1%) and Grade 1 (19.8%). Monomicrobial infections were identified in 63.7% of individuals, polymicrobial infections in 17.6%, and no growth in 18.7%. Gram-negative organisms predominated, including <i>Pseudomonas spp.</i> (n = 74), <i>Escherichia spp.</i> (n = 60), <i>Klebsiella spp.</i> (n = 50), <i>Proteus spp.</i> (n = 43), and <i>Acinetobacter spp.</i> (n = 25). Among Gram-positive organisms, <i>Staphylococcus spp.</i> (n = 81) and <i>Enterococcus spp.</i> (n = 43) were common.ConclusionsThe screened population demonstrated a high burden of advanced Grade 3B DFUs, predominantly associated with Gram-negative pathogens amenable to bacteriophage targeting. But this pilot study intentionally focused on Grade 1B and Grade 2B ulcers to assess the feasibility and safety of bacteriophage therapy in predefined, less severe DFUs. This pre-screening process supported the feasibility and enrollment of eligible participants for the subsequent bacteriophage therapy pilot study.</p>","PeriodicalId":94229,"journal":{"name":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","volume":" ","pages":"15347346261486517"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The international journal of lower extremity wounds","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15347346261486517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveTo evaluate the clinical severity and microbiological characteristics of participants with type 2 diabetes and foot ulcers (DFUs) screened for eligibility into a bacteriophage therapy pilot study.Research Design And MethodsAdults aged (≥18 years) with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and active DFUs presenting to a tertiary care centre were screened using predefined eligibility criteria. Ulcers were graded according to the University of Texas Diabetic Foot Classification System. Microbiological analysis included standard culture techniques and biochemical tests for identification of microorganism. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize ulcer severity, microbial patterns, and eligibility outcomes.ResultsA total of 595 individuals were screened. Grade 3 ulcers accounted for 51.1% of cases, followed by Grade 2 (29.1%) and Grade 1 (19.8%). Monomicrobial infections were identified in 63.7% of individuals, polymicrobial infections in 17.6%, and no growth in 18.7%. Gram-negative organisms predominated, including Pseudomonas spp. (n = 74), Escherichia spp. (n = 60), Klebsiella spp. (n = 50), Proteus spp. (n = 43), and Acinetobacter spp. (n = 25). Among Gram-positive organisms, Staphylococcus spp. (n = 81) and Enterococcus spp. (n = 43) were common.ConclusionsThe screened population demonstrated a high burden of advanced Grade 3B DFUs, predominantly associated with Gram-negative pathogens amenable to bacteriophage targeting. But this pilot study intentionally focused on Grade 1B and Grade 2B ulcers to assess the feasibility and safety of bacteriophage therapy in predefined, less severe DFUs. This pre-screening process supported the feasibility and enrollment of eligible participants for the subsequent bacteriophage therapy pilot study.

2型糖尿病和足部溃疡患者纳入噬菌体治疗试点研究的预筛选
目的评估2型糖尿病和足部溃疡(DFUs)患者的临床严重程度和微生物学特征,以筛选入选噬菌体治疗试点研究的资格。研究设计和方法使用预先确定的资格标准筛选到三级保健中心就诊的年龄(≥18岁)2型糖尿病(T2DM)和活动性DFUs患者。根据德克萨斯大学糖尿病足分类系统对溃疡进行分级。微生物学分析包括标准培养技术和鉴定微生物的生化试验。描述性统计用于总结溃疡严重程度、微生物模式和合格性结果。结果共筛查595人。3级溃疡占51.1%,其次是2级(29.1%)和1级(19.8%)。63.7%的人感染单菌菌,17.6%的人感染多菌菌,18.7%的人感染无增长。革兰氏阴性菌占主导地位,包括假单胞菌(74)、埃希氏菌(60)、克雷伯氏菌(50)、变形杆菌(43)和不动杆菌(25)。革兰氏阳性菌中,常见葡萄球菌(81株)和肠球菌(43株)。结论筛选人群显示出高负荷的晚期3B级DFUs,主要与可耐受噬菌体靶向的革兰氏阴性病原体相关。但这项试点研究有意将重点放在1B级和2B级溃疡上,以评估噬菌体治疗预先确定的不太严重的dfu的可行性和安全性。这一预筛选过程支持了后续噬菌体治疗试点研究的可行性和合格参与者的入组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书