Outcomes of the Sustainable Culturally Adapted Nutrition Program (SCAN) and food supplement program to improve engagement with the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP).

IF 3.5
Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare Pub Date : 2026-08-24 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1838175
William B Perkison, Pierre Fwelo, Natalia I Heredia, Ella Garza, James J Yang, Fernanda Velasco-Huerta, Serena A Rodriguez, Sidra S Beg, Catherine Pulicken, Patenne D Mathews, Belinda M Reininger, Roshanda S Chenier, Maria E Fernandez
{"title":"Outcomes of the Sustainable Culturally Adapted Nutrition Program (SCAN) and food supplement program to improve engagement with the National Diabetes Prevention Program (NDPP).","authors":"William B Perkison, Pierre Fwelo, Natalia I Heredia, Ella Garza, James J Yang, Fernanda Velasco-Huerta, Serena A Rodriguez, Sidra S Beg, Catherine Pulicken, Patenne D Mathews, Belinda M Reininger, Roshanda S Chenier, Maria E Fernandez","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1838175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) is an evidence-based lifestyle program for patients with prediabetes, but low attendance and retention hinder its effectiveness. To improve adherence, we developed the Sustainable Culturally Adapted Nutrition (SCAN) program. SCAN includes 4 group cooking technique lessons and group motivational interviewing counseling to reinforce participants' ability to adapt and sustain the dietary recommendations discussed in the National DPP. The study aims were to assess 1) the feasibility of incorporating SCAN into the National DPP and 2) health related outcomes for SCAN + National DPP compared to National DPP only.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We employed a pragmatic quasi-experimental approach for this pilot. 37 National DPP participants were recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Center in Houston, Texas, and were randomized to participate in the intervention or control arms. The primary outcome was National DPP attendance, and the secondary outcomes were weight and body mass index (BMI). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared baseline characteristics. Linear regression assessed the association between weight and National DPP attendance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 12 months, the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses found no significant difference in attendance. There was a greater dose-response association between National DPP attendance and average weight loss in the intervention group. Among the SCAN cohort, there were improvements in confidence in assessing personal risk for diabetes and ability to reach healthcare providers.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SCAN's integration into the National DPP has shown potential in improving attendance and was well received. Larger scale implementation is necessary to understand the long-term impact of SCAN.</p>","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"7 ","pages":"1838175"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13547056/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2026.1838175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The National Diabetes Prevention Program (National DPP) is an evidence-based lifestyle program for patients with prediabetes, but low attendance and retention hinder its effectiveness. To improve adherence, we developed the Sustainable Culturally Adapted Nutrition (SCAN) program. SCAN includes 4 group cooking technique lessons and group motivational interviewing counseling to reinforce participants' ability to adapt and sustain the dietary recommendations discussed in the National DPP. The study aims were to assess 1) the feasibility of incorporating SCAN into the National DPP and 2) health related outcomes for SCAN + National DPP compared to National DPP only.

Methods: We employed a pragmatic quasi-experimental approach for this pilot. 37 National DPP participants were recruited from a Federally Qualified Health Center in Houston, Texas, and were randomized to participate in the intervention or control arms. The primary outcome was National DPP attendance, and the secondary outcomes were weight and body mass index (BMI). Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests compared baseline characteristics. Linear regression assessed the association between weight and National DPP attendance.

Results: At 12 months, the intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses found no significant difference in attendance. There was a greater dose-response association between National DPP attendance and average weight loss in the intervention group. Among the SCAN cohort, there were improvements in confidence in assessing personal risk for diabetes and ability to reach healthcare providers.

Conclusion: SCAN's integration into the National DPP has shown potential in improving attendance and was well received. Larger scale implementation is necessary to understand the long-term impact of SCAN.

可持续文化适应营养计划(SCAN)和食品补充计划的成果,以提高与国家糖尿病预防计划(NDPP)的接触。
目的:国家糖尿病预防计划(National Diabetes Prevention Program,简称National DPP)是一项针对糖尿病前期患者的循证生活方式计划,但低出勤率和保留率阻碍了其有效性。为了提高依从性,我们制定了可持续文化适应营养(SCAN)计划。SCAN包括4个小组烹饪技术课程和小组动机访谈咨询,以加强参与者适应和维持国家DPP中讨论的饮食建议的能力。本研究的目的是评估1)将SCAN纳入国家DPP的可行性;2)与仅国家DPP相比,SCAN +国家DPP的健康相关结果。方法:我们采用实用的准实验方法。37名全国DPP参与者从德克萨斯州休斯顿的一家联邦合格健康中心招募,并随机分为干预组或对照组。主要结局是全国民进党出席率,次要结局是体重和身体质量指数(BMI)。卡方检验和Fisher精确检验比较了基线特征。线性回归评估体重与民进党出席率之间的关系。结果:在12个月时,意向治疗和方案分析发现出席率没有显著差异。在干预组中,全国DPP出席率与平均体重减轻之间存在更大的剂量反应关联。在SCAN队列中,评估个人糖尿病风险的信心和与医疗保健提供者联系的能力有所提高。结论:SCAN与国家民进党的整合显示出提高出勤率的潜力,并受到好评。要了解SCAN的长期影响,需要更大规模的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书