Environmental and occupational exposure in newly diagnosed lung cancer - data from the PROTEON study.

IF 2.7
Anne Sibille, Jessica Hendrick, Aurore Cue Alvarez, Marie Ernst, Laurence Seidel, Bernard Duysinx, Renaud Louis, Jean-Louis Corhay
{"title":"Environmental and occupational exposure in newly diagnosed lung cancer - data from the PROTEON study.","authors":"Anne Sibille, Jessica Hendrick, Aurore Cue Alvarez, Marie Ernst, Laurence Seidel, Bernard Duysinx, Renaud Louis, Jean-Louis Corhay","doi":"10.1080/17476348.2026.2729508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Environmental (E) and occupational (O) lung cancer (LC) is under-reported. Raising the awareness for this problem could help optimize prevention and screening.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In 181 consecutive non-small cell LC patients (January 2023-December 2024, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium) E risk factors (RF) and ORF were collected through a self-reporting questionnaire (open and direct questions) with sociodemographic, tumor- and work-related data. The primary objective was to identify ERF and ORF prevalence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean age was 68.2 ± 8.8 years, 55.8% males, 93.4% (former) smokers. Half of the patients (53%) lived in (peri-)urban areas. 50% disclosed an obstructive airway disease and 31.5% had a positive LC family history. Of the 270 jobs registered, 78.5% were manual. Only 23.8% of the workers used protective equipment. 72.4% of the patients reported exposure to at least one ORF through direct questions, and the most frequent pulmonary carcinogens were asbestos (36.5%), silica (22.1%), welding fumes (15.5%), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (14.9%), and diesel engine exhaust (14.4%). Overall, 93.9% of patients reported at least one E/ORF other than tobacco. A request for compensation was introduced in <3% of the patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Non-tobacco RF for LC are virtually always present in non-small cell LC patients and under-reported.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00005602,259).</p>","PeriodicalId":94007,"journal":{"name":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert review of respiratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2026.2729508","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Environmental (E) and occupational (O) lung cancer (LC) is under-reported. Raising the awareness for this problem could help optimize prevention and screening.

Methods: In 181 consecutive non-small cell LC patients (January 2023-December 2024, University Hospital of Liège, Belgium) E risk factors (RF) and ORF were collected through a self-reporting questionnaire (open and direct questions) with sociodemographic, tumor- and work-related data. The primary objective was to identify ERF and ORF prevalence.

Results: Mean age was 68.2 ± 8.8 years, 55.8% males, 93.4% (former) smokers. Half of the patients (53%) lived in (peri-)urban areas. 50% disclosed an obstructive airway disease and 31.5% had a positive LC family history. Of the 270 jobs registered, 78.5% were manual. Only 23.8% of the workers used protective equipment. 72.4% of the patients reported exposure to at least one ORF through direct questions, and the most frequent pulmonary carcinogens were asbestos (36.5%), silica (22.1%), welding fumes (15.5%), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (14.9%), and diesel engine exhaust (14.4%). Overall, 93.9% of patients reported at least one E/ORF other than tobacco. A request for compensation was introduced in <3% of the patients.

Conclusion: Non-tobacco RF for LC are virtually always present in non-small cell LC patients and under-reported.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT00005602,259).

新诊断肺癌的环境和职业暴露——来自PROTEON研究的数据。
背景:环境(E)和职业(O)肺癌(LC)报道不足。提高对这一问题的认识有助于优化预防和筛查。方法:对181例非小细胞LC患者(2023年1月- 2024年12月,比利时利奥尔奇大学医院)的E危险因素(RF)和ORF进行问卷调查(开放性和直接性问题),包括社会人口学、肿瘤和工作相关数据。主要目的是确定ERF和ORF的患病率。结果:平均年龄68.2±8.8岁,男性55.8%,戒烟者93.4%。一半的患者(53%)居住在(近)城市地区。50%的患者有阻塞性气道疾病,31.5%的患者有LC家族史。在登记的270个工作岗位中,78.5%是手工工作。只有23.8%的工人使用了防护装备。72.4%的患者通过直接询问报告暴露于至少一种ORF,最常见的肺部致癌物是石棉(36.5%)、二氧化硅(22.1%)、焊接烟雾(15.5%)、多环芳烃(14.9%)和柴油机尾气(14.4%)。总体而言,93.9%的患者报告了除烟草以外的至少一种E/ORF。结论中提出了赔偿要求:非小细胞LC患者中几乎总是存在非烟草RF,并且报告不足。试验注册:该试验在ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT 5602259)注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书