Possible influence of reflecting on the tense of the client's utterances: A preliminary finding.

IF 1.3
PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences Pub Date : 2026-09-07 eCollection Date: 2026-09-01 DOI:10.1002/pcn5.70407
Tomoyuki Sugita, Hiromi Tsujii, Takao Iwanami, Suimei Morikawa, Tadafumi Kato
{"title":"Possible influence of reflecting on the tense of the client's utterances: A preliminary finding.","authors":"Tomoyuki Sugita, Hiromi Tsujii, Takao Iwanami, Suimei Morikawa, Tadafumi Kato","doi":"10.1002/pcn5.70407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Open Dialogue (OD), developed in Finland, has gained attention in psychiatric care for its emphasis on human rights. However, quantitative research remains limited, and its implementation in Japan is still at an early stage. Reflecting, originally developed in Norway, is a core element of OD's dialogical practice and has shown promise, yet studies on its mechanisms remain scarce.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study examined how reflecting is associated with changes in the tense structure of client utterances. Audio from outpatient sessions was transcribed, and utterances were categorized into four tense types: future, present, recent past, and past. Changes before and after reflecting were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results showed that past-oriented utterances significantly increased in the reflecting group, while no significant changes occurred in the individual consultation group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that reflecting may be associated with increased references to past experiences, which may be related to self-reflection as one aspect of a deepening dialogical process.</p>","PeriodicalId":74405,"journal":{"name":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","volume":"5 3","pages":"e70407"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549221/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pcn5.70407","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Open Dialogue (OD), developed in Finland, has gained attention in psychiatric care for its emphasis on human rights. However, quantitative research remains limited, and its implementation in Japan is still at an early stage. Reflecting, originally developed in Norway, is a core element of OD's dialogical practice and has shown promise, yet studies on its mechanisms remain scarce.

Methods: This study examined how reflecting is associated with changes in the tense structure of client utterances. Audio from outpatient sessions was transcribed, and utterances were categorized into four tense types: future, present, recent past, and past. Changes before and after reflecting were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA and Wilcoxon tests.

Results: Results showed that past-oriented utterances significantly increased in the reflecting group, while no significant changes occurred in the individual consultation group.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that reflecting may be associated with increased references to past experiences, which may be related to self-reflection as one aspect of a deepening dialogical process.

反思对来访者话语时态的可能影响:初步发现。
目的:芬兰制定的公开对话(OD)因其强调人权而在精神病护理领域引起注意。然而,定量研究仍然有限,其在日本的实施仍处于早期阶段。反思最初在挪威发展起来,是OD对话实践的核心要素,并显示出前景,但对其机制的研究仍然很少。方法:本研究考察了反映与客户话语时态结构变化的关系。门诊病人的录音被转录,话语被分为四种时态类型:将来时、现在时、最近的过去时和过去时。采用重复测量方差分析和Wilcoxon检验分析反射前后的变化。结果:反思组的过去导向话语明显增多,而个别咨询组无明显变化。结论:这些发现表明,反思可能与越来越多地提及过去的经历有关,这可能与自我反思有关,作为深化对话过程的一个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书