Evaluation of central auditory processing in patients with obstructive sleep APNEA syndrome (central auditory processing in sleep APNEA).

IF 1.6 4区 心理学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ömer Faruk Emeksiz, Muhammed Mustafa Şeker, Abitter Yücel, Mustafa Kürşat Gökcan
{"title":"Evaluation of central auditory processing in patients with obstructive sleep APNEA syndrome (central auditory processing in sleep APNEA).","authors":"Ömer Faruk Emeksiz, Muhammed Mustafa Şeker, Abitter Yücel, Mustafa Kürşat Gökcan","doi":"10.1080/23279095.2026.2729523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the central auditory processing abilities of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 86 individuals aged between 20 and 55 years, with normal pure-tone averages and no history of any pathology that could affect hearing, were included in the study. The study group consisted of 43 individuals diagnosed with OSAS by polysomnography, while the control group comprised 43 individuals without an OSAS diagnosis or related symptoms. All participants underwent pure-tone audiometry test, speech reception threshold (SRT), speech discrimination score (SDS), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN), and Masking Level Difference (MLD) test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>According to the findings, pure-tone thresholds in the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group bilaterally across the 125-8000 Hz frequency range, except at 2000 Hz. The mean SRT values were also significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of SDS. The mean score of the study group in the DPT was significantly higher than that of the control group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the FPT, GIN, or MLD tests. However, in the SPT, FPT, and GIN tests, the OSAS group exhibited poorer performance compared to the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, both peripheral hearing and central auditory processing abilities were found to be adversely affected in individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.</p>","PeriodicalId":51308,"journal":{"name":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","volume":" ","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Neuropsychology-Adult","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2026.2729523","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the central auditory processing abilities of patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome (OSAS).

Methods: A total of 86 individuals aged between 20 and 55 years, with normal pure-tone averages and no history of any pathology that could affect hearing, were included in the study. The study group consisted of 43 individuals diagnosed with OSAS by polysomnography, while the control group comprised 43 individuals without an OSAS diagnosis or related symptoms. All participants underwent pure-tone audiometry test, speech reception threshold (SRT), speech discrimination score (SDS), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), Duration Pattern Test (DPT), Gaps-in-Noise Test (GIN), and Masking Level Difference (MLD) test.

Results: According to the findings, pure-tone thresholds in the study group were significantly higher than those of the control group bilaterally across the 125-8000 Hz frequency range, except at 2000 Hz. The mean SRT values were also significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. No significant difference was found between the groups in terms of SDS. The mean score of the study group in the DPT was significantly higher than that of the control group. No significant differences were observed between the groups in the FPT, GIN, or MLD tests. However, in the SPT, FPT, and GIN tests, the OSAS group exhibited poorer performance compared to the control group.

Conclusion: In conclusion, both peripheral hearing and central auditory processing abilities were found to be adversely affected in individuals with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者中枢性听觉处理的评价(睡眠呼吸暂停中的中枢性听觉处理)。
目的:评价阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征(OSAS)患者的中枢听觉加工能力。方法:86例年龄在20 ~ 55岁之间,纯音平均值正常,无任何影响听力的病理史的个体被纳入研究。研究组由43名通过多导睡眠图诊断为OSAS的个体组成,而对照组由43名没有OSAS诊断或相关症状的个体组成。所有被试分别进行纯音听力测试、语音接收阈值(SRT)、语音识别评分(SDS)、频率模式测试(FPT)、持续时间模式测试(DPT)、噪声间隙测试(GIN)和掩蔽水平差(MLD)测试。结果:在125- 8000hz频率范围内,除2000hz外,研究组的纯音阈值显著高于对照组的双边阈值。研究组的平均SRT值也明显高于对照组。两组间SDS差异无统计学意义。研究组DPT平均评分显著高于对照组。在FPT、GIN或MLD测试中,两组间未观察到显著差异。然而,在SPT、FPT和GIN测试中,与对照组相比,OSAS组表现出较差的表现。结论:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停综合征患者的外周听力和中枢听觉加工能力均受到不利影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult
Applied Neuropsychology-Adult CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-PSYCHOLOGY
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
134
期刊介绍: pplied Neuropsychology-Adult publishes clinical neuropsychological articles concerning assessment, brain functioning and neuroimaging, neuropsychological treatment, and rehabilitation in adults. Full-length articles and brief communications are included. Case studies of adult patients carefully assessing the nature, course, or treatment of clinical neuropsychological dysfunctions in the context of scientific literature, are suitable. Review manuscripts addressing critical issues are encouraged. Preference is given to papers of clinical relevance to others in the field. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor-in-Chief, and, if found suitable for further considerations are peer reviewed by independent, anonymous expert referees. All peer review is single-blind and submission is online via ScholarOne Manuscripts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书