Blessing Ugochi Ojembe, Augustine Chukwuebuka Okoh, Karamat Kelani, Michael Kalu
{"title":"Rethinking cultural appropriateness: a critical literature review of definitions, fit, and practice in Black interventions, support, and care.","authors":"Blessing Ugochi Ojembe, Augustine Chukwuebuka Okoh, Karamat Kelani, Michael Kalu","doi":"10.1080/13557858.2026.2729320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Culturally appropriate (CA) interventions have been linked to improved health and social outcomes among minoritized groups. However, there remains no clear consensus on what constitutes 'appropriateness' in a culture, particularly within Black culture. This critical literature review examines the conceptualization of cultural appropriateness in research, interventions, care and support designed for Black communities.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We searched several databases (including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Black Thought and Culture and Google Scholar) and used a combination of keywords (cultural appropriateness, interventions, and Black) to identify articles that described cultural appropriateness and its related terms such as cultural competence, cultural humility, cultural safety, cultural tailoring, and cultural relevance as it relates to Black-focused interventions, including social, clinical and policy.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>The review clarifies the meaning of cultural appropriateness and its relationship to terms such as cultural competence, cultural humility, cultural safety, cultural tailoring and cultural relevance. Culturally appropriate interventions incorporate salient cultural features, experiences and values of the target population and involve cultural elements like language and local context to enhance credibility, legitimacy, and access. Yet, despite widespread use of the label 'culturally appropriate,' existing evaluation tools often measure providers' competence rather than the appropriateness of the intervention itself for specific groups. Also, the often single 'Black culture' lens applied in the literature disregards the heterogeneity and distinct identities, histories, and needs within the Black population and foregrounds an awareness of Black diversity and tailoring programs to specific Black groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Overall, cultural appropriateness remains a contested and fluid concept. The interchangeable use of related terms contributes to conceptual ambiguity and hinders the development of effective, community-grounded interventions. Advancing intersubjective understanding and conceptual clarity is therefore warranted for improving research, policy, and practice in culturally responsive care for Black communities.</p>","PeriodicalId":51038,"journal":{"name":"Ethnicity & Health","volume":" ","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ethnicity & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13557858.2026.2729320","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHNIC STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Culturally appropriate (CA) interventions have been linked to improved health and social outcomes among minoritized groups. However, there remains no clear consensus on what constitutes 'appropriateness' in a culture, particularly within Black culture. This critical literature review examines the conceptualization of cultural appropriateness in research, interventions, care and support designed for Black communities.
Design: We searched several databases (including PubMed, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, Black Thought and Culture and Google Scholar) and used a combination of keywords (cultural appropriateness, interventions, and Black) to identify articles that described cultural appropriateness and its related terms such as cultural competence, cultural humility, cultural safety, cultural tailoring, and cultural relevance as it relates to Black-focused interventions, including social, clinical and policy.
Findings: The review clarifies the meaning of cultural appropriateness and its relationship to terms such as cultural competence, cultural humility, cultural safety, cultural tailoring and cultural relevance. Culturally appropriate interventions incorporate salient cultural features, experiences and values of the target population and involve cultural elements like language and local context to enhance credibility, legitimacy, and access. Yet, despite widespread use of the label 'culturally appropriate,' existing evaluation tools often measure providers' competence rather than the appropriateness of the intervention itself for specific groups. Also, the often single 'Black culture' lens applied in the literature disregards the heterogeneity and distinct identities, histories, and needs within the Black population and foregrounds an awareness of Black diversity and tailoring programs to specific Black groups.
Conclusion: Overall, cultural appropriateness remains a contested and fluid concept. The interchangeable use of related terms contributes to conceptual ambiguity and hinders the development of effective, community-grounded interventions. Advancing intersubjective understanding and conceptual clarity is therefore warranted for improving research, policy, and practice in culturally responsive care for Black communities.
目的:文化上适当的干预措施与改善少数群体的健康和社会结果有关。然而,在一种文化中,特别是在黑人文化中,什么是“适当性”仍然没有明确的共识。这篇批判性的文献综述考察了为黑人社区设计的研究、干预、护理和支持中文化适当性的概念化。设计:我们检索了几个数据库(包括PubMed、PsycINFO、CINAHL、Scopus、Web of Science、黑人思想与文化和谷歌Scholar),并使用关键词(文化适当性、干预和黑人)组合来识别描述文化适当性及其相关术语的文章,如文化能力、文化谦逊、文化安全、文化剪裁和文化相关性,因为它与黑人关注的干预有关,包括社会、临床和政策。研究结果:本研究澄清了文化适当性的含义及其与文化能力、文化谦逊、文化安全、文化剪裁和文化相关性等术语的关系。文化上适当的干预措施结合了目标人群的显著文化特征、经验和价值观,并涉及语言和当地环境等文化因素,以提高可信度、合法性和可及性。然而,尽管“文化适宜”这个标签被广泛使用,现有的评估工具通常衡量的是提供者的能力,而不是干预本身对特定群体的适宜性。此外,文学作品中经常使用单一的“黑人文化”镜头,忽视了黑人人口的异质性和独特的身份、历史和需求,并强调了黑人多样性的意识,并为特定的黑人群体量身定制了项目。结论:总体而言,文化适宜性仍然是一个有争议和不确定的概念。相关术语的互换使用造成了概念上的模糊性,阻碍了有效的、以社区为基础的干预措施的发展。因此,促进主体间的理解和概念的清晰度对于改善黑人社区文化响应性护理的研究、政策和实践是有必要的。
期刊介绍:
Ethnicity & Health
is an international academic journal designed to meet the world-wide interest in the health of ethnic groups. It embraces original papers from the full range of disciplines concerned with investigating the relationship between ’ethnicity’ and ’health’ (including medicine and nursing, public health, epidemiology, social sciences, population sciences, and statistics). The journal also covers issues of culture, religion, gender, class, migration, lifestyle and racism, in so far as they relate to health and its anthropological and social aspects.