Impact of Quality Indicators on Transplant Access: A Prospective Cohort Study in Australian Dialysis Patients.

IF 1.9
Rebecca Ling, Christopher E Davies, Tia Mark, Stephen P McDonald, David J Goodman
{"title":"Impact of Quality Indicators on Transplant Access: A Prospective Cohort Study in Australian Dialysis Patients.","authors":"Rebecca Ling, Christopher E Davies, Tia Mark, Stephen P McDonald, David J Goodman","doi":"10.1111/nep.70277","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>In 2012, the Australian state of Victoria introduced a 6-monthly reportable renal quality indicator (QI) for the proportion of patient's waitlisted or pre-emptively transplanted by set time points after beginning kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This prospective cohort study aimed to determine if the QI influenced timeliness of transplant waitlisting for Victorians, compared to the rest of Australia as a control group.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients aged 18-70 commencing KRT between 2007 and 2020 were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) and divided into three time eras. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients waitlisted or transplanted at 6, 12 and 24 months from starting KRT. Given the systematic disadvantage reported, specific analysis was performed to examine the QI's effect on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in Victoria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 25 836 (14.7% Indigenous) patients starting dialysis, one third (8587, 5.7% Indigenous) were listed for transplant. Following implementation of the QI, the proportion of Victorian patients waitlisted within 6, 12 and 24-months of starting KRT increased (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.85, 1.67 and 1.55 respectively; all p < 0.001). There was no significant change in Australian (non-Victorian) rates at 6 and 12 months but a small increase was observed at 24 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Following introduction of the Victorian renal QI, the proportion of Victorian patients waitlisted at key timepoints improved more than patients in Australian states without QIs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520716,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)","volume":"31 9","pages":"e70277"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13550104/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nep.70277","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: In 2012, the Australian state of Victoria introduced a 6-monthly reportable renal quality indicator (QI) for the proportion of patient's waitlisted or pre-emptively transplanted by set time points after beginning kidney replacement therapy (KRT). This prospective cohort study aimed to determine if the QI influenced timeliness of transplant waitlisting for Victorians, compared to the rest of Australia as a control group.

Methods: Patients aged 18-70 commencing KRT between 2007 and 2020 were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry (ANZDATA) and divided into three time eras. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients waitlisted or transplanted at 6, 12 and 24 months from starting KRT. Given the systematic disadvantage reported, specific analysis was performed to examine the QI's effect on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in Victoria.

Results: Of 25 836 (14.7% Indigenous) patients starting dialysis, one third (8587, 5.7% Indigenous) were listed for transplant. Following implementation of the QI, the proportion of Victorian patients waitlisted within 6, 12 and 24-months of starting KRT increased (adjusted OR [aOR] 1.85, 1.67 and 1.55 respectively; all p < 0.001). There was no significant change in Australian (non-Victorian) rates at 6 and 12 months but a small increase was observed at 24 months.

Conclusion: Following introduction of the Victorian renal QI, the proportion of Victorian patients waitlisted at key timepoints improved more than patients in Australian states without QIs.

质量指标对移植可及性的影响:澳大利亚透析患者的前瞻性队列研究。
目的:2012年,澳大利亚维多利亚州引入了一个6个月报告的肾脏质量指标(QI),用于在开始肾脏替代治疗(KRT)后按设定时间点等待或预先移植的患者比例。这项前瞻性队列研究旨在确定与澳大利亚其他地区作为对照组相比,QI是否影响维多利亚人移植等待名单的及时性。方法:从澳大利亚和新西兰透析和移植登记处(ANZDATA)中提取2007年至2020年期间开始KRT的18-70岁患者,并将其分为三个时代。主要结果是KRT开始后6、12和24个月等待或移植的患者百分比。鉴于报告的系统性劣势,我们进行了具体的分析,以检验QI对居住在维多利亚州的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民的影响。结果:在25836例(14.7%土著)开始透析的患者中,三分之一(8587例,5.7%土著)被列为移植患者。实施QI后,维多利亚州患者在KRT开始后6个月、12个月和24个月内排队等候的比例增加(调整OR [aOR]分别为1.85、1.67和1.55);均p结论:引入维多利亚州肾脏QI后,维多利亚州患者在关键时间点排队等候的比例比澳大利亚未实施QI的患者改善更多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书