Cluster-based identification of movement patterns in bilateral and unilateral drop jump tasks: insights into the performance-injury conflict.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Di Wang, Anu M Valtonen, Tom Thiel, Ying Gao, Juha-Pekka Kulmala
{"title":"Cluster-based identification of movement patterns in bilateral and unilateral drop jump tasks: insights into the performance-injury conflict.","authors":"Di Wang, Anu M Valtonen, Tom Thiel, Ying Gao, Juha-Pekka Kulmala","doi":"10.1080/14763141.2026.2727081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Stiff landing mechanics has been associated with increased anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk, yet it may optimise jump performance, creating a theoretical performance-injury conflict. This study examined movement patterns, their consistency, and performance during two-leg drop vertical jumps (DVJ) and single-leg drop vertical jumps (SDVJ). Forty-six healthy adults completed 3D motion analysis of DVJ from 30 cm and SDVJ from 15 cm, along with isokinetic knee torque testing. Ten ACL injury-related biomechanical variables were analysed using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Clustering based on movement mechanics revealed three patterns: high-stiffness (shorter contact time, reduced joint flexion, greater joint moments and vertical GRF), medium-stiffness, and soft-stiffness (longer contact time, deeper flexion, lowest moments and GRF). Jump height did not differ between clusters, and 46% of participants changed pattern between tasks. Isokinetic knee extensor torque differed between the high- and soft-stiffness groups only in SDVJ, with greater values in the high-stiffness group. A separate performance-based classification (median split) revealed large differences in jump height-up to twofold-yet no difference in peak vertical GRF. These findings highlight the need for task-specific assessments that consider both discrete metrics and propulsive force production when identifying at-risk athletes while preserving performance potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":49482,"journal":{"name":"Sports Biomechanics","volume":" ","pages":"1-20"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2026.2727081","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stiff landing mechanics has been associated with increased anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury risk, yet it may optimise jump performance, creating a theoretical performance-injury conflict. This study examined movement patterns, their consistency, and performance during two-leg drop vertical jumps (DVJ) and single-leg drop vertical jumps (SDVJ). Forty-six healthy adults completed 3D motion analysis of DVJ from 30 cm and SDVJ from 15 cm, along with isokinetic knee torque testing. Ten ACL injury-related biomechanical variables were analysed using principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering. Clustering based on movement mechanics revealed three patterns: high-stiffness (shorter contact time, reduced joint flexion, greater joint moments and vertical GRF), medium-stiffness, and soft-stiffness (longer contact time, deeper flexion, lowest moments and GRF). Jump height did not differ between clusters, and 46% of participants changed pattern between tasks. Isokinetic knee extensor torque differed between the high- and soft-stiffness groups only in SDVJ, with greater values in the high-stiffness group. A separate performance-based classification (median split) revealed large differences in jump height-up to twofold-yet no difference in peak vertical GRF. These findings highlight the need for task-specific assessments that consider both discrete metrics and propulsive force production when identifying at-risk athletes while preserving performance potential.

基于集群的识别运动模式在双边和单边落差跳跃任务:洞察性能伤害冲突。
僵硬着陆力学与前交叉韧带(ACL)损伤风险增加有关,但它可能会优化跳跃性能,从而产生理论上的性能-损伤冲突。本研究考察了两腿垂直落差跳(DVJ)和单腿垂直落差跳(SDVJ)的运动模式、一致性和表现。46名健康成人完成了30厘米处DVJ和15厘米处SDVJ的三维运动分析,以及等速膝关节扭矩测试。采用主成分分析和层次聚类分析10个前交叉韧带损伤相关的生物力学变量。基于运动力学的聚类揭示了三种模式:高刚度(接触时间短、关节屈曲小、关节力矩大、垂直GRF)、中刚度和软刚度(接触时间长、关节屈曲大、弯矩小、GRF小)。跳跃高度在不同的组之间没有差异,46%的参与者在不同的任务之间改变了模式。等速膝关节伸肌扭矩仅在SDVJ高刚度组和软刚度组之间存在差异,高刚度组的数值更大。一个单独的基于性能的分类(中位数分割)揭示了跳跃高度的巨大差异-高达两倍-但峰值垂直GRF没有差异。这些发现强调了在确定有风险的运动员时,在保持表现潜力的同时,需要考虑离散指标和推进力产生的特定任务评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Biomechanics
Sports Biomechanics 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
135
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Biomechanics is the Thomson Reuters listed scientific journal of the International Society of Biomechanics in Sports (ISBS). The journal sets out to generate knowledge to improve human performance and reduce the incidence of injury, and to communicate this knowledge to scientists, coaches, clinicians, teachers, and participants. The target performance realms include not only the conventional areas of sports and exercise, but also fundamental motor skills and other highly specialized human movements such as dance (both sport and artistic). Sports Biomechanics is unique in its emphasis on a broad biomechanical spectrum of human performance including, but not limited to, technique, skill acquisition, training, strength and conditioning, exercise, coaching, teaching, equipment, modeling and simulation, measurement, and injury prevention and rehabilitation. As well as maintaining scientific rigour, there is a strong editorial emphasis on ''reader friendliness''. By emphasising the practical implications and applications of research, the journal seeks to benefit practitioners directly. Sports Biomechanics publishes papers in four sections: Original Research, Reviews, Teaching, and Methods and Theoretical Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书