Interprofessional geriatric competencies in the DACH region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) : Insights from a multinational multilingual open online survey.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
M Honegger, S Lindner-Rabl, G Ogliari, L Soraci, Ch Pertinatsch, M C Polidori, R Roller-Wirnsberger
{"title":"Interprofessional geriatric competencies in the DACH region (Germany, Austria and Switzerland) : Insights from a multinational multilingual open online survey.","authors":"M Honegger, S Lindner-Rabl, G Ogliari, L Soraci, Ch Pertinatsch, M C Polidori, R Roller-Wirnsberger","doi":"10.1007/s00391-026-02646-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Geriatric care requires coordinated, interprofessional and person-centered approaches; however, geriatric competencies among healthcare professionals (HCP) vary considerably across Europe, and only limited data are available for the DACH (D: Deutschland, Germany; A: Austria; CH: Confoederatio Helvetica, Switzerland) region.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate self-perceived knowledge, relevance and interest regarding key geriatric topics and skills among HCPs in the DACH region and to compare findings with other European countries.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Secondary data analyses of the PROGRAMMING COST Action 21122 online survey. The DACH responses (n = 291) were compared with those from other European countries (n = 5134) and 33 geriatric topics and skills were analyzed to identify educational priorities.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The HCPs working in the DACH region rated their perceived geriatric knowledge higher than HCPs working in other European countries. Nevertheless, substantial perceived knowledge gaps remained, particularly in the areas of dementia, depression, chronic pain, cognitive screening and sarcopenia. Perceived relevance and interest in further education exceeded self-assessed knowledge levels. In contrast, topics such as oncogeriatrics, gerodontology and geriatric emergency care were assigned lower priority.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite overall high self-perceived competence, important gaps persist, especially in complex, interdisciplinary areas. Continuing education needs appear to be strongly influenced by clinical practice and system structures. Given the large number of medical doctors in our data, some implications are intraprofessional; nevertheless, targeted competency-based cross-professional educational initiatives and frameworks are needed to strengthen geriatric care and support workforce mobility across Europe.</p>","PeriodicalId":49345,"journal":{"name":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","volume":" ","pages":"515-521"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13597566/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zeitschrift Fur Gerontologie Und Geriatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00391-026-02646-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Geriatric care requires coordinated, interprofessional and person-centered approaches; however, geriatric competencies among healthcare professionals (HCP) vary considerably across Europe, and only limited data are available for the DACH (D: Deutschland, Germany; A: Austria; CH: Confoederatio Helvetica, Switzerland) region.

Objectives: To investigate self-perceived knowledge, relevance and interest regarding key geriatric topics and skills among HCPs in the DACH region and to compare findings with other European countries.

Material and methods: Secondary data analyses of the PROGRAMMING COST Action 21122 online survey. The DACH responses (n = 291) were compared with those from other European countries (n = 5134) and 33 geriatric topics and skills were analyzed to identify educational priorities.

Results: The HCPs working in the DACH region rated their perceived geriatric knowledge higher than HCPs working in other European countries. Nevertheless, substantial perceived knowledge gaps remained, particularly in the areas of dementia, depression, chronic pain, cognitive screening and sarcopenia. Perceived relevance and interest in further education exceeded self-assessed knowledge levels. In contrast, topics such as oncogeriatrics, gerodontology and geriatric emergency care were assigned lower priority.

Conclusion: Despite overall high self-perceived competence, important gaps persist, especially in complex, interdisciplinary areas. Continuing education needs appear to be strongly influenced by clinical practice and system structures. Given the large number of medical doctors in our data, some implications are intraprofessional; nevertheless, targeted competency-based cross-professional educational initiatives and frameworks are needed to strengthen geriatric care and support workforce mobility across Europe.

DACH地区(德国、奥地利和瑞士)的跨专业老年能力:来自多国多语言开放在线调查的见解。
背景:老年护理需要协调、跨专业和以人为本的方法;然而,医疗保健专业人员(HCP)的老年能力在欧洲各地差异很大,只有有限的数据可用于DACH地区(D: Deutschland,德国;A:奥地利;CH: Confoederatio Helvetica,瑞士)。目的:调查DACH地区HCPs对关键老年主题和技能的自我认知知识、相关性和兴趣,并将调查结果与其他欧洲国家进行比较。材料和方法:程序成本行动21122在线调查的二次数据分析。将DACH调查结果(n = 291)与其他欧洲国家的调查结果(n = 5134)进行比较,并对33个老年主题和技能进行分析,以确定教育重点。结果:在DACH地区工作的HCPs对他们感知到的老年知识的评价高于在其他欧洲国家工作的HCPs。然而,仍然存在大量的认知差距,特别是在痴呆症、抑郁症、慢性疼痛、认知筛查和肌肉减少症等领域。感知到的相关性和对继续教育的兴趣超过了自我评估的知识水平。相比之下,诸如老年肿瘤学、老年病学和老年急诊护理等主题的优先级较低。结论:尽管整体的自我认知能力很高,但重要的差距仍然存在,特别是在复杂的跨学科领域。继续教育需求似乎受到临床实践和系统结构的强烈影响。考虑到我们的数据中有大量的医生,一些影响是专业内部的;然而,需要有针对性的基于能力的跨专业教育举措和框架,以加强老年护理并支持整个欧洲的劳动力流动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
126
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The fact that more and more people are becoming older and are having a significant influence on our society is due to intensive geriatric research and geriatric medicine in the past and present. The Zeitschrift für Gerontologie und Geriatrie has contributed to this area for many years by informing a broad spectrum of interested readers about various developments in gerontology research. Special issues focus on all questions concerning gerontology, biology and basic research of aging, geriatric research, psychology and sociology as well as practical aspects of geriatric care. Target group: Geriatricians, social gerontologists, geriatric psychologists, geriatric psychiatrists, nurses/caregivers, nurse researchers, biogerontologists in geriatric wards/clinics, gerontological institutes, and institutions of teaching and further or continuing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书