Transient arousal-driven or valence-driven? The effects of alerting cues on the attentional boost effect in depression-prone individuals.

IF 4.6 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Meina Zhang, Xuanying Li, Qinling Xie, Yiyuan Wang, Lingxin Liu, Liujing Huang, Fajie Huang
{"title":"Transient arousal-driven or valence-driven? The effects of alerting cues on the attentional boost effect in depression-prone individuals.","authors":"Meina Zhang, Xuanying Li, Qinling Xie, Yiyuan Wang, Lingxin Liu, Liujing Huang, Fajie Huang","doi":"10.1186/s40359-026-05313-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depression-related negative emotional processing bias is widely regarded as a core cognitive mechanism underlying the maintenance of depressive states. However, it remains unclear whether such bias disrupts fundamental cognitive enhancement processes driven by transient arousal. The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE), the phenomenon whereby stimuli concurrently presented with target detection events are better remembered than those paired with non-target events, is thought to reflect a phasic arousal enhancement mechanism triggered by target detection, whose processing pathway has been proposed to be relatively independent of emotional valence.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>This study employed a 2 (Group: depression-prone vs. healthy control) × 2 (Alerting cue: Cue vs. No-Cue) × 3 (Emotional valence: positive vs. neutral vs. negative) × 2 (Stimulus type: target-paired vs. distractor-paired) mixed factorial design. Eighty-one university students (42 in the depression-prone group, defined as BDI-II ≥ 14 and confirmed via DSM-5 structured clinical interview as not meeting diagnostic criteria for clinical depression; 39 in the healthy control group) completed both a classic ABE paradigm and an alerting ABE paradigm. The exogenous alerting cue was an orange circle signaling the imminent appearance of a target.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>(1) Both groups exhibited a significant ABE, with Bayesian analysis providing moderate evidence for the null hypothesis of no group difference in ABE (BF<sub>01</sub> = 3.2-6.7); (2) During encoding, a positivity advantage emerged under the No-Cue condition, whereas alerting cues significantly improved overall detection efficiency and attenuated valence-related differences; (3) During recognition, alerting cues modulated the ABE magnitude for emotional stimuli, with a particularly pronounced enhancement for positive information.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The negative bias in depression-prone individuals did not impair the fundamental arousal-regulation pathway; rather, their cognitive abnormalities exhibited pronounced context-dependence. Exogenous alerting cues may optimize attentional gating mechanisms, thereby reshaping attention allocation and memory enhancement patterns in depression-prone individuals. This study provides preliminary behavioral evidence for distinguishing \"valence-driven\" and \"transient arousal-driven\" cognitive enhancement pathways and offers tentative theoretical support for the potential utility of arousal-modulation-based intervention strategies in depression-prone populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":37867,"journal":{"name":"BMC Psychology","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551893/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05313-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Depression-related negative emotional processing bias is widely regarded as a core cognitive mechanism underlying the maintenance of depressive states. However, it remains unclear whether such bias disrupts fundamental cognitive enhancement processes driven by transient arousal. The Attentional Boost Effect (ABE), the phenomenon whereby stimuli concurrently presented with target detection events are better remembered than those paired with non-target events, is thought to reflect a phasic arousal enhancement mechanism triggered by target detection, whose processing pathway has been proposed to be relatively independent of emotional valence.

Method: This study employed a 2 (Group: depression-prone vs. healthy control) × 2 (Alerting cue: Cue vs. No-Cue) × 3 (Emotional valence: positive vs. neutral vs. negative) × 2 (Stimulus type: target-paired vs. distractor-paired) mixed factorial design. Eighty-one university students (42 in the depression-prone group, defined as BDI-II ≥ 14 and confirmed via DSM-5 structured clinical interview as not meeting diagnostic criteria for clinical depression; 39 in the healthy control group) completed both a classic ABE paradigm and an alerting ABE paradigm. The exogenous alerting cue was an orange circle signaling the imminent appearance of a target.

Result: (1) Both groups exhibited a significant ABE, with Bayesian analysis providing moderate evidence for the null hypothesis of no group difference in ABE (BF01 = 3.2-6.7); (2) During encoding, a positivity advantage emerged under the No-Cue condition, whereas alerting cues significantly improved overall detection efficiency and attenuated valence-related differences; (3) During recognition, alerting cues modulated the ABE magnitude for emotional stimuli, with a particularly pronounced enhancement for positive information.

Conclusion: The negative bias in depression-prone individuals did not impair the fundamental arousal-regulation pathway; rather, their cognitive abnormalities exhibited pronounced context-dependence. Exogenous alerting cues may optimize attentional gating mechanisms, thereby reshaping attention allocation and memory enhancement patterns in depression-prone individuals. This study provides preliminary behavioral evidence for distinguishing "valence-driven" and "transient arousal-driven" cognitive enhancement pathways and offers tentative theoretical support for the potential utility of arousal-modulation-based intervention strategies in depression-prone populations.

短暂的觉醒驱动还是价驱动?警告提示对抑郁倾向个体注意力增强效应的影响。
背景:抑郁相关的负性情绪加工偏倚被广泛认为是抑郁状态维持的核心认知机制。然而,目前尚不清楚这种偏见是否会破坏由短暂唤醒驱动的基本认知增强过程。注意增强效应(attention Boost Effect, ABE)是指与目标检测事件同时出现的刺激比与非目标事件同时出现的刺激更容易被记住的现象,它被认为反映了一种由目标检测触发的相位唤醒增强机制,其加工途径被认为相对独立于情绪效价。方法:本研究采用2(组:抑郁倾向vs健康对照)× 2(提示提示vs无提示)× 3(情绪效价:正效、中性效价vs负效价)× 2(刺激类型:目标配对vs干扰配对)混合因子设计。81名大学生(42名为抑郁倾向组,定义为BDI-II≥14,并通过DSM-5结构化临床访谈确认不符合临床抑郁症诊断标准;39名为健康对照组)完成了经典ABE范式和警报ABE范式。外源性警报提示是一个橙色圆圈,表示目标即将出现。结果:(1)两组ABE均有显著性差异,贝叶斯分析为ABE无组间差异的原假设提供了中度证据(BF01 = 3.2 ~ 6.7);(2)在编码过程中,无提示条件下存在正性优势,而提示条件显著提高了整体检测效率,并减弱了价相关差异;(3)在认知过程中,提示线索调节了情绪刺激的ABE强度,对积极信息的增强尤为明显。结论:抑郁易感个体的负性偏倚不影响基本的觉醒-调节通路;相反,他们的认知异常表现出明显的情境依赖性。外源性警报提示可以优化注意门控机制,从而重塑抑郁易感个体的注意分配和记忆增强模式。本研究为区分“价驱动”和“短暂觉醒驱动”的认知增强途径提供了初步的行为证据,并为基于觉醒调节的干预策略在抑郁易感人群中的潜在效用提供了初步的理论支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Psychology
BMC Psychology Psychology-Psychology (all)
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
2.80%
发文量
265
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Psychology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers manuscripts on all aspects of psychology, human behavior and the mind, including developmental, clinical, cognitive, experimental, health and social psychology, as well as personality and individual differences. The journal welcomes quantitative and qualitative research methods, including animal studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书