Safety and Efficacy of Melatonin for Sleep Disorders in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.

IF 2.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mohammad Mehdi Abbasi, Shiva Pasha, Farbod Khosravi, Amir Reza Boskabadi, Faezeh Jamshidi, Zahra Rahimian, Pooya Eini, Yashar Talebi, Mohammadsadegh Jafari, Sara Bahramabadinejad, Afsaneh Safarian, Hossein Soltaninejad, Mohammad Rahmanian
{"title":"Safety and Efficacy of Melatonin for Sleep Disorders in Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.","authors":"Mohammad Mehdi Abbasi, Shiva Pasha, Farbod Khosravi, Amir Reza Boskabadi, Faezeh Jamshidi, Zahra Rahimian, Pooya Eini, Yashar Talebi, Mohammadsadegh Jafari, Sara Bahramabadinejad, Afsaneh Safarian, Hossein Soltaninejad, Mohammad Rahmanian","doi":"10.2174/0127724328470308260825053321","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/objective: </strong>Sleep disruption is common among patients with malignancy and may worsen quality of life, treatment tolerance, and symptom burden. Melatonin is a circadianregulating hormone with a favorable safety profile and potential sleep-promoting effects. This metaanalysis and systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of melatonin for sleep-related outcomes in patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to 1 June 2026 without language or country restrictions. Randomized clinical trials comparing melatonin with placebo or an active control in patients with cancer and reporting sleep-related outcomes were eligible. Data extraction, study selection, and riskof- bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist were performed by two reviewers independently. Random-effects meta-analyses with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were conducted in Stata 17.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from seven studies were pooled in the meta-analysis, and thirteen articles were included in the systematic review. The overall effect of melatonin was insignificant (SMD = -0.85 with a 95% CI of -2.46 to 0.76) with high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 94.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in US studies (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: [-0.99, -0.14], I2 = 31.5%). Meta-analysis of the seven PSQI components showed no significant item-level improvement with melatonin treatment. Studies using non-PSQI sleep outcomes showed mixed findings, with short-term improvement in insomnia severity in one trial but modest or non-significant effects in others.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>While the overall impact of melatonin on sleep quality was not statistically significant, subgroup analyses and qualitative evidence indicate clinically relevant benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Melatonin shows promising but uncertain benefits for sleep disruptions in patients with malignancies. However, the evidence should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity, limited sample sizes, short intervention durations, and predominantly subjective sleep measures. Larger, well-standardized randomized trials using both subjective and objective sleep assessments are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":29871,"journal":{"name":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Reviews in Clinical and Experimental Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0127724328470308260825053321","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/objective: Sleep disruption is common among patients with malignancy and may worsen quality of life, treatment tolerance, and symptom burden. Melatonin is a circadianregulating hormone with a favorable safety profile and potential sleep-promoting effects. This metaanalysis and systematic review evaluated the safety and efficacy of melatonin for sleep-related outcomes in patients with cancer.

Methods: Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, and EMBASE were systematically searched from inception to 1 June 2026 without language or country restrictions. Randomized clinical trials comparing melatonin with placebo or an active control in patients with cancer and reporting sleep-related outcomes were eligible. Data extraction, study selection, and riskof- bias assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist were performed by two reviewers independently. Random-effects meta-analyses with Hartung-Knapp adjustment were conducted in Stata 17.0.

Results: Data from seven studies were pooled in the meta-analysis, and thirteen articles were included in the systematic review. The overall effect of melatonin was insignificant (SMD = -0.85 with a 95% CI of -2.46 to 0.76) with high heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 94.5%). Subgroup analysis revealed a significant decrease in the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) in US studies (SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: [-0.99, -0.14], I2 = 31.5%). Meta-analysis of the seven PSQI components showed no significant item-level improvement with melatonin treatment. Studies using non-PSQI sleep outcomes showed mixed findings, with short-term improvement in insomnia severity in one trial but modest or non-significant effects in others.

Discussion: While the overall impact of melatonin on sleep quality was not statistically significant, subgroup analyses and qualitative evidence indicate clinically relevant benefits.

Conclusion: Melatonin shows promising but uncertain benefits for sleep disruptions in patients with malignancies. However, the evidence should be interpreted cautiously because of substantial clinical and statistical heterogeneity, limited sample sizes, short intervention durations, and predominantly subjective sleep measures. Larger, well-standardized randomized trials using both subjective and objective sleep assessments are needed.

褪黑素治疗癌症患者睡眠障碍的安全性和有效性:随机临床试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
简介/目的:睡眠中断在恶性肿瘤患者中很常见,并可能使生活质量、治疗耐受性和症状负担恶化。褪黑素是一种昼夜节律调节激素,具有良好的安全性和潜在的睡眠促进作用。这项荟萃分析和系统回顾评估了褪黑素对癌症患者睡眠相关结局的安全性和有效性。方法:系统检索Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、ScienceDirect、Cochrane Library、ClinicalTrials.gov和EMBASE,检索时间从成立到2026年6月1日,无语言和国家限制。在癌症患者中比较褪黑素与安慰剂或主动对照并报告睡眠相关结果的随机临床试验是合格的。数据提取、研究选择和偏倚风险评估采用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的检查表,由两位审稿人独立完成。采用Stata 17.0进行Hartung-Knapp调整的随机效应meta分析。结果:meta分析汇集了7项研究的数据,13篇文章被纳入系统评价。褪黑素的总体效果不显著(SMD = -0.85, 95% CI为-2.46至0.76),研究间异质性高(I2 = 94.5%)。亚组分析显示,美国研究中匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)显著下降(SMD = -0.57, 95% CI: [-0.99, -0.14], I2 = 31.5%)。对七个PSQI成分的荟萃分析显示,褪黑激素治疗没有显著的项目水平改善。使用非psqi睡眠结果的研究显示了不同的结果,一项试验在短期内改善了失眠的严重程度,但在其他试验中效果一般或不显著。讨论:虽然褪黑素对睡眠质量的总体影响没有统计学意义,但亚组分析和定性证据表明临床相关的益处。结论:褪黑素对恶性肿瘤患者的睡眠中断显示出有希望但不确定的益处。然而,由于大量的临床和统计异质性、有限的样本量、短暂的干预持续时间和主要的主观睡眠测量,证据应谨慎解释。需要更大规模、标准化的随机试验,使用主观和客观的睡眠评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
9.10%
发文量
55
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书