Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of exercise therapy among patients with diabetic neuropathy: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.

IF 6.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Shalimol Us, K T Moly, Menon V Usha, Vivek Lakshmanan, Eilean Lazarus Rathinasamy, Vineetha Karuveettil, Valentina Vanzi
{"title":"Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of exercise therapy among patients with diabetic neuropathy: a mixed methods systematic review protocol.","authors":"Shalimol Us, K T Moly, Menon V Usha, Vivek Lakshmanan, Eilean Lazarus Rathinasamy, Vineetha Karuveettil, Valentina Vanzi","doi":"10.11124/JBIES-26-00107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This mixed methods systematic review will aim to identify, synthesize, and integrate quantitative and qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of exercise therapy for patients with diabetic neuropathy.</p><p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most prevalent and debilitating complications of diabetes, often leading to impaired mobility, pain, reduced physical function, and diminished quality of life. Exercise therapy is widely recommended as a core component of management; however, its implementation in clinical and community settings remains inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>This review will include qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies involving adults (≥18 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The review will consider evidence relating to barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation, uptake, adherence, or delivery of exercise therapy from multiple perspectives, including patient (eg, beliefs, motivation, health literacy), provider (eg, knowledge, attitudes, training), and health system (eg, accessibility, policies, financing, service delivery).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The review will follow the JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews using a convergent integrated approach. The data will be extracted from databases and gray literature, including MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid) Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Google Scholar. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a customized form, screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, and assess methodological quality. Qualitative data will be transformed into \"qualitized\" statements and integrated with quantitative findings. A single set of integrated findings will be developed using meta-aggregation and narrative integration techniques, resulting in synthesized statements and practical recommendations. The review will follow PRISMA reporting guidelines.</p><p><strong>Review registration: </strong>PROSPERO CRD420261284500.</p>","PeriodicalId":36399,"journal":{"name":"JBI evidence synthesis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBI evidence synthesis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11124/JBIES-26-00107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This mixed methods systematic review will aim to identify, synthesize, and integrate quantitative and qualitative evidence on the barriers and facilitators affecting the implementation of exercise therapy for patients with diabetic neuropathy.

Introduction: Diabetic neuropathy is one of the most prevalent and debilitating complications of diabetes, often leading to impaired mobility, pain, reduced physical function, and diminished quality of life. Exercise therapy is widely recommended as a core component of management; however, its implementation in clinical and community settings remains inconsistent.

Eligibility criteria: This review will include qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods studies involving adults (≥18 years) with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus and diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The review will consider evidence relating to barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation, uptake, adherence, or delivery of exercise therapy from multiple perspectives, including patient (eg, beliefs, motivation, health literacy), provider (eg, knowledge, attitudes, training), and health system (eg, accessibility, policies, financing, service delivery).

Methods: The review will follow the JBI methodology for mixed methods systematic reviews using a convergent integrated approach. The data will be extracted from databases and gray literature, including MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL (EBSCOhost), Embase (Ovid) Scopus, Cochrane CENTRAL, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global, the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP), and Google Scholar. Two reviewers will independently extract data using a customized form, screen titles, abstracts, and full texts, and assess methodological quality. Qualitative data will be transformed into "qualitized" statements and integrated with quantitative findings. A single set of integrated findings will be developed using meta-aggregation and narrative integration techniques, resulting in synthesized statements and practical recommendations. The review will follow PRISMA reporting guidelines.

Review registration: PROSPERO CRD420261284500.

糖尿病神经病变患者实施运动疗法的障碍和促进因素:一项混合方法的系统评价方案。
目的:本研究旨在识别、综合和整合影响糖尿病神经病变患者运动治疗实施的障碍和促进因素的定量和定性证据。简介:糖尿病性神经病变是糖尿病最常见和最衰弱的并发症之一,常导致活动能力受损、疼痛、身体功能下降和生活质量下降。运动疗法被广泛推荐为管理的核心组成部分;然而,它在临床和社区环境中的实施仍然不一致。入选标准:本综述将包括定性、定量和混合方法的研究,涉及1型或2型糖尿病和糖尿病周围神经病变的成人(≥18岁)。本综述将从多个角度考虑影响运动疗法实施、吸收、坚持或提供的障碍和促进因素的证据,包括患者(如信念、动机、健康素养)、提供者(如知识、态度、培训)和卫生系统(如可及性、政策、融资、服务提供)。方法:本综述将遵循JBI方法,采用融合集成方法进行混合方法系统综述。数据将从数据库和灰色文献中提取,包括MEDLINE (Ovid)、CINAHL (EBSCOhost)、Embase (Ovid) Scopus、Cochrane CENTRAL、ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global、WHO国际临床试验注册平台(ICTRP)和谷歌Scholar。两名审稿人将使用定制的表格、屏幕标题、摘要和全文独立提取数据,并评估方法质量。定性数据将转化为“定性”陈述,并与定量结果相结合。将使用综合综合和叙述综合技术编制一套综合调查结果,从而形成综合陈述和实际建议。审查将遵循PRISMA报告准则。审核注册:PROSPERO CRD420261284500。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBI evidence synthesis
JBI evidence synthesis Nursing-Nursing (all)
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
218
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书