Menstrual health as an occupational equity issue in high-stress industries: A narrative review.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Women & Health Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-09-07 DOI:10.1080/03630242.2026.2715988
Meltem Akca, Meltem Yavuz Sercekman, Özlem Ayaz
{"title":"Menstrual health as an occupational equity issue in high-stress industries: A narrative review.","authors":"Meltem Akca, Meltem Yavuz Sercekman, Özlem Ayaz","doi":"10.1080/03630242.2026.2715988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This review examines menstrual health as a neglected dimension of women's health and occupational equity, with particular attention to high-stress and gendered occupational contexts. It asks how menstruation is addressed or silenced within workplace health frameworks, and how these dynamics are intensified in safety-critical, shift-based, and regulated occupations. A narrative review was conducted to synthesize literature from occupational health, feminist organizational scholarship, health policy, aviation studies, and workplace inclusion research. Aviation is used as a focal case, bringing together circadian disruption, fatigue exposure, public visibility, bodily discipline, and gendered occupational hierarchies. The review identifies four dynamics. First, rigid job design, workload intensity, circadian disruption, and recovery opportunities exacerbate menstrual health risks. Second, policy responses remain fragmented, uneven, and symbolic, offering recognition without accommodation or redistribution. Third, organizational cultures of silence and stigma frame menstruation as unprofessional, discouraging disclosure and reinforcing gendered norms of ideal workerhood. Fourth, inclusive and participatory leadership practices can create openings for psychological safety and employee voice, but their impact remains constrained without structural and policy reform. By reframing menstruation as an occupational health and equity issue rather than an individual concern, this review contributes to debates on embodied work, gendered organizations, and menstrual inclusion in high-pressure workplace contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":23972,"journal":{"name":"Women & Health","volume":" ","pages":"447-465"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women & Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03630242.2026.2715988","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review examines menstrual health as a neglected dimension of women's health and occupational equity, with particular attention to high-stress and gendered occupational contexts. It asks how menstruation is addressed or silenced within workplace health frameworks, and how these dynamics are intensified in safety-critical, shift-based, and regulated occupations. A narrative review was conducted to synthesize literature from occupational health, feminist organizational scholarship, health policy, aviation studies, and workplace inclusion research. Aviation is used as a focal case, bringing together circadian disruption, fatigue exposure, public visibility, bodily discipline, and gendered occupational hierarchies. The review identifies four dynamics. First, rigid job design, workload intensity, circadian disruption, and recovery opportunities exacerbate menstrual health risks. Second, policy responses remain fragmented, uneven, and symbolic, offering recognition without accommodation or redistribution. Third, organizational cultures of silence and stigma frame menstruation as unprofessional, discouraging disclosure and reinforcing gendered norms of ideal workerhood. Fourth, inclusive and participatory leadership practices can create openings for psychological safety and employee voice, but their impact remains constrained without structural and policy reform. By reframing menstruation as an occupational health and equity issue rather than an individual concern, this review contributes to debates on embodied work, gendered organizations, and menstrual inclusion in high-pressure workplace contexts.

月经健康作为高压力行业的职业公平问题:叙述回顾。
本审查审查了月经健康作为妇女健康和职业公平的一个被忽视的方面,特别注意高压力和性别职业背景。它询问了如何在工作场所健康框架内解决或沉默月经问题,以及这些动态如何在安全关键,轮班和受监管的职业中得到加强。对职业健康、女权主义组织奖学金、卫生政策、航空研究和工作场所包容研究等方面的文献进行了综述。航空是一个重点案例,将昼夜节律中断、疲劳暴露、公众能见度、身体纪律和性别职业等级结合在一起。该审查确定了四个动态。首先,僵化的工作设计、工作量强度、昼夜节律中断和恢复机会加剧了月经健康风险。其次,政策回应仍然是碎片化的、不平衡的、象征性的,提供的是承认,而不是迁就或再分配。第三,沉默和耻辱的组织文化将月经视为不专业的,不鼓励披露,并强化了理想工作环境的性别规范。第四,包容性和参与性领导实践可以为心理安全和员工声音创造机会,但如果没有结构和政策改革,其影响仍然有限。通过将月经重新定义为职业健康和公平问题,而不是个人问题,本综述有助于讨论具体工作、性别组织和高压工作环境下的月经包容问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Women & Health
Women & Health Multiple-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Women & Health publishes original papers and critical reviews containing highly useful information for researchers, policy planners, and all providers of health care for women. These papers cover findings from studies concerning health and illness and physical and psychological well-being of women, as well as the environmental, lifestyle and sociocultural factors that are associated with health and disease, which have implications for prevention, early detection and treatment, limitation of disability and rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书