Preoperative Resting-State EEG Features Associated With Chronic Postoperative Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yaru Li, Yiqiyuan Zhang, Qi Han, Yujing Long, Shu Wang, Bailin Jiang, Yi Feng
{"title":"Preoperative Resting-State EEG Features Associated With Chronic Postoperative Pain After Breast Cancer Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Yaru Li, Yiqiyuan Zhang, Qi Han, Yujing Long, Shu Wang, Bailin Jiang, Yi Feng","doi":"10.1097/ANA.0000000000001161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Chronic postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery varies substantially among patients and may reflect individual neurophysiological susceptibility. We explored whether preoperative resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) features are associated with clinically significant chronic postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective cohort study, 100 female patients scheduled for mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery were enrolled. After exclusions for incomplete EEG acquisition, protocol changes, loss to follow-up, or poor EEG quality, 84 patients were analyzed. Preoperative variables included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). At 3 months, patients were classified as higher-pain (HP; Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥4) or lower-pain (LP; NRS <4). Exploratory analyses compared clinical characteristics, spectral power, and functional connectivity between groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-seven patients (32.1%) were classified as HP. The median [IQR] 3-month NRS score was 5 [4 to 6] in the HP group and 1 [0 to 2] in the LP group. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery (OR=3.43, 95% CI: 1.31-8.99; P=0.010) and ALND versus no ALND (OR=5.75, 95% CI: 2.12-15.59; P<0.001) were associated with higher pain. Preoperative gamma-band power at F3, Fz, and F4 was higher in HP patients, with no group differences in other bands. Gamma-band connectivity involving frontal, insular, and cingulate regions was also stronger in the HP group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative frontal gamma activity and connectivity may reflect baseline neurophysiological vulnerability to chronic postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery. These exploratory group-level findings warrant validation in larger cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":16550,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANA.0000000000001161","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Chronic postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery varies substantially among patients and may reflect individual neurophysiological susceptibility. We explored whether preoperative resting-state electroencephalography (EEG) features are associated with clinically significant chronic postoperative pain.

Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 100 female patients scheduled for mastectomy or breast-conserving surgery were enrolled. After exclusions for incomplete EEG acquisition, protocol changes, loss to follow-up, or poor EEG quality, 84 patients were analyzed. Preoperative variables included age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status, neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical approach, and axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). At 3 months, patients were classified as higher-pain (HP; Numeric Rating Scale [NRS] ≥4) or lower-pain (LP; NRS <4). Exploratory analyses compared clinical characteristics, spectral power, and functional connectivity between groups.

Results: Twenty-seven patients (32.1%) were classified as HP. The median [IQR] 3-month NRS score was 5 [4 to 6] in the HP group and 1 [0 to 2] in the LP group. Mastectomy versus breast-conserving surgery (OR=3.43, 95% CI: 1.31-8.99; P=0.010) and ALND versus no ALND (OR=5.75, 95% CI: 2.12-15.59; P<0.001) were associated with higher pain. Preoperative gamma-band power at F3, Fz, and F4 was higher in HP patients, with no group differences in other bands. Gamma-band connectivity involving frontal, insular, and cingulate regions was also stronger in the HP group.

Conclusions: Preoperative frontal gamma activity and connectivity may reflect baseline neurophysiological vulnerability to chronic postoperative pain after breast cancer surgery. These exploratory group-level findings warrant validation in larger cohorts.

术前静息状态脑电图特征与乳腺癌术后慢性疼痛相关:一项前瞻性队列研究。
背景:乳腺癌手术后的慢性术后疼痛在患者之间差异很大,可能反映了个体的神经生理易感性。我们探讨术前静息状态脑电图(EEG)特征是否与临床显著的术后慢性疼痛相关。方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了100名计划进行乳房切除术或保乳手术的女性患者。在排除脑电图采集不完整、方案改变、随访缺失或脑电图质量差等因素后,84例患者被分析。术前变量包括年龄、体重指数、美国麻醉医师协会的身体状况、新辅助化疗、手术入路和腋窝淋巴结清扫(ALND)。3个月时,患者被分为高疼痛(HP;数值评定量表[NRS]≥4)或低疼痛(LP; NRS结果:27例患者(32.1%)被分为HP。HP组3个月的中位[IQR] NRS评分为5 [4 ~ 6],LP组为1[0 ~ 2]。乳房切除术与保乳手术(OR=3.43, 95% CI: 1.31-8.99; P=0.010), ALND与无ALND (OR=5.75, 95% CI: 2.12-15.59; P)结论:术前额叶伽玛活动和连通性可能反映了乳腺癌手术后慢性术后疼痛的基线神经生理易感性。这些探索性组水平的发现在更大的队列中得到了验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
10.80%
发文量
119
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgical Anesthesiology (JNA) is a peer-reviewed publication directed to an audience of neuroanesthesiologists, neurosurgeons, neurosurgical monitoring specialists, neurosurgical support staff, and Neurosurgical Intensive Care Unit personnel. The journal publishes original peer-reviewed studies in the form of Clinical Investigations, Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Reports, Review Articles, Journal Club synopses of current literature from related journals, presentation of Points of View on controversial issues, Book Reviews, Correspondence, and Abstracts from affiliated neuroanesthesiology societies. JNA is the Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience in Anesthesiology and Critical Care, the Neuroanaesthesia and Critical Care Society of Great Britain and Ireland, the Association de Neuro-Anesthésiologie Réanimation de langue Française, the Wissenschaftlicher Arbeitskreis Neuroanästhesie der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizen, the Arbeitsgemeinschaft Deutschsprachiger Neuroanästhesisten und Neuro-Intensivmediziner, the Korean Society of Neuroanesthesia, the Japanese Society of Neuroanesthesia and Critical Care, the Neuroanesthesiology Chapter of the Colegio Mexicano de Anesthesiología, the Indian Society of Neuroanesthesiology and Critical Care, and the Thai Society for Neuroanesthesia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书