Evaluation of renal microvascular perfusion in dogs with cardiac disease using Superb Microvascular Imaging.

IF 2.2 2区 农林科学
Risa Yasuda, Kensuke Nakamura, Noboru Sasaki, Nozomu Yokoyama, Kazuyoshi Sasaoka, Mei Sugawara-Suda, Sei Kawamoto, Nozomi Shiohara, Yuki Kawakami, Kei Sato, Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi
{"title":"Evaluation of renal microvascular perfusion in dogs with cardiac disease using Superb Microvascular Imaging.","authors":"Risa Yasuda, Kensuke Nakamura, Noboru Sasaki, Nozomu Yokoyama, Kazuyoshi Sasaoka, Mei Sugawara-Suda, Sei Kawamoto, Nozomi Shiohara, Yuki Kawakami, Kei Sato, Mitsuyoshi Takiguchi","doi":"10.1093/jvimsj/aalag198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Renal dysfunction in cardiac disease is attributed to both reduced cardiac output and venous congestion; however, relative contributions of these mechanisms are difficult to evaluate clinically.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis/objectives: </strong>Renal microvascular perfusion assessed by Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) would be associated with indices of cardiac output and venous congestion in dogs with cardiac disease.</p><p><strong>Animals: </strong>Forty-three client-owned dogs were enrolled: 15 healthy dogs (Control), 21 dogs with cardiac disease but without right-sided heart failure (non-RHF), and 7 dogs with signs of right-sided heart failure (RHF).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional observational study. SMI images were obtained from renal cortex, and mean SMI signal intensity (SMI-SI) was calculated as an index of renal perfusion. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) was used as an index of cardiac output, while caudal vena cava short-to-long axis ratio at minimal inspiratory diameter (CVC SD/LD) was used to indicate venous congestion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median SMI-SI was 41.3 (95% CI, 39.1-43.8) in Control, 21.6 (95% CI: 19.4-23.9) in non-RHF, and 18.6 (95% CI, 16.4-21.0) in RHF. Both cardiac disease groups had lower values than Control (P < .001). SMI-SI was negatively correlated with CVC SD/LD (ρ = -0.59, P < .001) and positively correlated with LVOT-VTI (ρ = 0.43, P = .007). In full multivariable analysis, only CVC SD/LD was independently associated with SMI-SI (P = .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical importance: </strong>SMI detects reduced renal microvascular perfusion in dogs with cardiac disease, which is associated with venous congestion rather than cardiac output.</p>","PeriodicalId":17462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","volume":"40 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549437/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jvimsj/aalag198","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Renal dysfunction in cardiac disease is attributed to both reduced cardiac output and venous congestion; however, relative contributions of these mechanisms are difficult to evaluate clinically.

Hypothesis/objectives: Renal microvascular perfusion assessed by Superb Microvascular Imaging (SMI) would be associated with indices of cardiac output and venous congestion in dogs with cardiac disease.

Animals: Forty-three client-owned dogs were enrolled: 15 healthy dogs (Control), 21 dogs with cardiac disease but without right-sided heart failure (non-RHF), and 7 dogs with signs of right-sided heart failure (RHF).

Methods: Prospective cross-sectional observational study. SMI images were obtained from renal cortex, and mean SMI signal intensity (SMI-SI) was calculated as an index of renal perfusion. The left ventricular outflow tract velocity-time integral (LVOT-VTI) was used as an index of cardiac output, while caudal vena cava short-to-long axis ratio at minimal inspiratory diameter (CVC SD/LD) was used to indicate venous congestion.

Results: Median SMI-SI was 41.3 (95% CI, 39.1-43.8) in Control, 21.6 (95% CI: 19.4-23.9) in non-RHF, and 18.6 (95% CI, 16.4-21.0) in RHF. Both cardiac disease groups had lower values than Control (P < .001). SMI-SI was negatively correlated with CVC SD/LD (ρ = -0.59, P < .001) and positively correlated with LVOT-VTI (ρ = 0.43, P = .007). In full multivariable analysis, only CVC SD/LD was independently associated with SMI-SI (P = .001).

Conclusions and clinical importance: SMI detects reduced renal microvascular perfusion in dogs with cardiac disease, which is associated with venous congestion rather than cardiac output.

应用超细微血管成像技术评价心脏病犬肾微血管灌注。
背景:心脏疾病的肾功能障碍可归因于心输出量减少和静脉充血;然而,这些机制的相对贡献在临床上很难评估。假设/目的:超细微血管成像(SMI)评估的肾脏微血管灌注与心脏疾病犬的心输出量和静脉充血指标相关。动物:43只客户拥有的狗被招募:15只健康的狗(对照组),21只患有心脏病但没有右侧心力衰竭(非RHF)的狗,7只有右侧心力衰竭(RHF)迹象的狗。方法:前瞻性横断面观察研究。从肾皮质获取SMI图像,计算平均SMI信号强度(SMI- si)作为肾脏灌注的指标。以左心室流出道速度-时间积分(LVOT-VTI)作为心输出量指标,以尾侧腔静脉最小吸气直径短长轴比(CVC SD/LD)作为静脉充血指标。结果:对照组中位SMI-SI为41.3 (95% CI, 39.1-43.8),非RHF组为21.6 (95% CI: 19.4-23.9), RHF组为18.6 (95% CI, 16.4-21.0)。结论及临床意义:SMI检测心脏病犬肾脏微血管灌注减少,这与静脉充血有关,而不是心输出量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine
Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine Veterinary-General Veterinary
自引率
11.50%
发文量
243
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine is to advance veterinary medical knowledge and improve the lives of animals by publication of authoritative scientific articles of animal diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书