Cross-sectional relationships between memory scores and neurodegeneration biomarkers in patients with suspected cognitive impairment.

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Lynn Sahhar, Milena Albrecht, Jennifer Pahl, Alexa Häger, Kathrin Reetz, Ana Sofia Costa
{"title":"Cross-sectional relationships between memory scores and neurodegeneration biomarkers in patients with suspected cognitive impairment.","authors":"Lynn Sahhar, Milena Albrecht, Jennifer Pahl, Alexa Häger, Kathrin Reetz, Ana Sofia Costa","doi":"10.1080/13803395.2026.2729728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>We aimed to examine whether additional metrics derived from the CERAD Word List Memory Test (WLMT) such as acquisition patterns, error frequencies, and consolidation efficiency, are associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ratings of brain atrophy and small vessel disease, in individuals with suspected cognitive impairment who nonetheless perform within normative ranges on the traditional WLMT measures.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included 109 patients from a memory clinic setting (46% female, median age 69.5 years, 55.1% with normal AD biomarkers, 25.7% in the AD continuum) that underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, CSF biomarker analysis, and visual MRI rating. Associations between traditional and additional memory scores and the biomarkers were examined using regression analyses, controlling for demographic variables and adjusting for multiple comparisons.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Correlations were modest and partly mediated by demographics. Traditional scores showed the strongest links, but additional scores \"lost access\" and \"learning ratio\" were also associated with lower Aβ CSF levels (ρ = -.23, <i>p</i> = .034) and medial‑temporal lobe atrophy (e.g. learning ratio, ρ = -.30, <i>p</i> = .036), suggesting sensitivity to subtle learning‑consolidation inefficiencies. High burden of white matter hyperintensities was associated with intrusion errors (U = 807.5, <i>p</i> < .05, d' = 0.23) and less stable learning (U = 613.0, <i>p</i> < .01, d' = 0.41).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both traditional and additional memory scores can assist early detection and risk stratification of neurodegenerative disease in patients with normative performance, but these findings require replication in larger, more heterogeneous cohorts.</p>","PeriodicalId":15382,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-14"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13803395.2026.2729728","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to examine whether additional metrics derived from the CERAD Word List Memory Test (WLMT) such as acquisition patterns, error frequencies, and consolidation efficiency, are associated with cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers of amyloid and tau pathology, as well as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) ratings of brain atrophy and small vessel disease, in individuals with suspected cognitive impairment who nonetheless perform within normative ranges on the traditional WLMT measures.

Methods: We included 109 patients from a memory clinic setting (46% female, median age 69.5 years, 55.1% with normal AD biomarkers, 25.7% in the AD continuum) that underwent comprehensive neuropsychological assessment, CSF biomarker analysis, and visual MRI rating. Associations between traditional and additional memory scores and the biomarkers were examined using regression analyses, controlling for demographic variables and adjusting for multiple comparisons.

Results: Correlations were modest and partly mediated by demographics. Traditional scores showed the strongest links, but additional scores "lost access" and "learning ratio" were also associated with lower Aβ CSF levels (ρ = -.23, p = .034) and medial‑temporal lobe atrophy (e.g. learning ratio, ρ = -.30, p = .036), suggesting sensitivity to subtle learning‑consolidation inefficiencies. High burden of white matter hyperintensities was associated with intrusion errors (U = 807.5, p < .05, d' = 0.23) and less stable learning (U = 613.0, p < .01, d' = 0.41).

Conclusions: Both traditional and additional memory scores can assist early detection and risk stratification of neurodegenerative disease in patients with normative performance, but these findings require replication in larger, more heterogeneous cohorts.

疑似认知障碍患者的记忆评分与神经退行性生物标志物之间的横断面关系。
作品简介:我们的目的是研究来自CERAD单词列表记忆测试(WLMT)的其他指标,如获取模式、错误频率和巩固效率,是否与淀粉样蛋白和tau病理的脑脊液(CSF)生物标志物以及脑萎缩和小血管疾病的磁共振成像(MRI)评分有关,这些指标适用于怀疑有认知障碍的个体,但在传统的WLMT测量中表现在标准范围内。方法:我们纳入了109名来自记忆诊所的患者(46%为女性,中位年龄69.5岁,55.1% AD生物标志物正常,25.7% AD连续体),进行了全面的神经心理学评估,CSF生物标志物分析和视觉MRI评分。在控制人口变量和调整多重比较的情况下,使用回归分析检查了传统记忆分数和额外记忆分数与生物标志物之间的联系。结果:相关性是适度的,部分由人口统计学介导。传统得分显示出最强的联系,但额外得分“失去访问”和“学习率”也与较低的Aβ CSF水平相关(ρ = - 0.23, p =)。034)和内侧颞叶萎缩(例如,学习率,ρ = - 0.30, p =。036),表明对细微的学习巩固效率低下的敏感性。结论:传统记忆评分和额外记忆评分都有助于神经退行性疾病的早期发现和风险分层,但这些发现需要在更大、更异质性的队列中进行复制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
4.50%
发文量
52
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology ( JCEN) publishes research on the neuropsychological consequences of brain disease, disorders, and dysfunction, and aims to promote the integration of theories, methods, and research findings in clinical and experimental neuropsychology. The primary emphasis of JCEN is to publish original empirical research pertaining to brain-behavior relationships and neuropsychological manifestations of brain disease. Theoretical and methodological papers, critical reviews of content areas, and theoretically-relevant case studies are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书