The impact of footwear on human talar trabecular architecture.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Hannah N Farrell, Andrea Luková, Sebastian Bachmann, Karley Spriggs, Alexander Synek, Dieter H Pahr, Zewdi J Tsegai
{"title":"The impact of footwear on human talar trabecular architecture.","authors":"Hannah N Farrell, Andrea Luková, Sebastian Bachmann, Karley Spriggs, Alexander Synek, Dieter H Pahr, Zewdi J Tsegai","doi":"10.1111/joa.70236","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The evolution of habitual bipedalism was a defining milestone in human history, yet fossil evidence indicates substantial variation in how bipedality was practiced. Trabecular bone, which responds throughout life to joint loading and orientation, offers a powerful way to investigate these differences. Interpreting variation in fossil hominins, however, requires a reliable baseline of intraspecific variation in modern humans, accounting for differences in lifestyle, mobility, and habitual behaviors. Many modern skeletal collections derive from postindustrial populations whose activity patterns, footwear use, and health profiles differ markedly from past populations, potentially biasing interpretations. Thus, habitually shod, postindustrial humans may not be the best proxy for the loading environments experienced by early hominins, whereas unshod individuals provide a closer approximation of barefoot locomotion. To explore the effects of footwear on internal bone structure, we examined trabecular architecture in the talus of habitually shod (N = 40) modern humans (Homo sapiens) from recent donation-based skeletal collections and habitually unshod (N = 16) individuals from the Andaman Island, Khoisan, and Aka populations, representing diverse ecological and subsistence contexts, using high-resolution micro-computed tomographic scans. Trabecular parameters-including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), relative BV/TV (rBV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), separation (Tb.Sp), number (Tb.N), and degree of anisotropy (DA)-were quantified using canonical holistic morphometric analysis (cHMA). Shod individuals exhibited higher mean BV/TV and greater variability in BV/TV, suggesting that the talus remains heavily loaded due to its central role in weight bearing during bipedal gait, and that different types of footwear create variable force distributions across the ankle. The spatial distribution of rBV/TV revealed further differences between the groups: shod individuals showed higher rBV/TV in the medial and posterior talus, consistent with more dorsiflexed and medially loaded ankle postures, whereas unshod individuals had elevated rBV/TV in the talar head and neck, potentially reflecting loading associated to squatting or climbing. Shod individuals also exhibited higher mean DA indicating more strongly organized and directionally constrained trabeculae. Mean BV/TV was likewise higher in the shod group and primarily driven by greater trabecular thickness, as trabecular separation and number were broadly similar between groups, suggesting loading differences associated with footwear primarily influence BV/TV and trabecular anisotropy. By establishing clear patterns of trabecular variation between shod and unshod modern humans, this study provides a robust comparative framework for interpreting locomotor behavior in fossil hominins, while highlighting the need to further disentangle the effects of footwear from differences in body size, stature, subsistence strategy, and other aspects of lifestyle among human populations. Recognizing how habitual behavior influences internal bone architecture is essential for reconstructing past movement patterns and understanding the evolutionary pathways of bipedalism.</p>","PeriodicalId":14971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13551078/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joa.70236","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The evolution of habitual bipedalism was a defining milestone in human history, yet fossil evidence indicates substantial variation in how bipedality was practiced. Trabecular bone, which responds throughout life to joint loading and orientation, offers a powerful way to investigate these differences. Interpreting variation in fossil hominins, however, requires a reliable baseline of intraspecific variation in modern humans, accounting for differences in lifestyle, mobility, and habitual behaviors. Many modern skeletal collections derive from postindustrial populations whose activity patterns, footwear use, and health profiles differ markedly from past populations, potentially biasing interpretations. Thus, habitually shod, postindustrial humans may not be the best proxy for the loading environments experienced by early hominins, whereas unshod individuals provide a closer approximation of barefoot locomotion. To explore the effects of footwear on internal bone structure, we examined trabecular architecture in the talus of habitually shod (N = 40) modern humans (Homo sapiens) from recent donation-based skeletal collections and habitually unshod (N = 16) individuals from the Andaman Island, Khoisan, and Aka populations, representing diverse ecological and subsistence contexts, using high-resolution micro-computed tomographic scans. Trabecular parameters-including bone volume fraction (BV/TV), relative BV/TV (rBV/TV), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th), separation (Tb.Sp), number (Tb.N), and degree of anisotropy (DA)-were quantified using canonical holistic morphometric analysis (cHMA). Shod individuals exhibited higher mean BV/TV and greater variability in BV/TV, suggesting that the talus remains heavily loaded due to its central role in weight bearing during bipedal gait, and that different types of footwear create variable force distributions across the ankle. The spatial distribution of rBV/TV revealed further differences between the groups: shod individuals showed higher rBV/TV in the medial and posterior talus, consistent with more dorsiflexed and medially loaded ankle postures, whereas unshod individuals had elevated rBV/TV in the talar head and neck, potentially reflecting loading associated to squatting or climbing. Shod individuals also exhibited higher mean DA indicating more strongly organized and directionally constrained trabeculae. Mean BV/TV was likewise higher in the shod group and primarily driven by greater trabecular thickness, as trabecular separation and number were broadly similar between groups, suggesting loading differences associated with footwear primarily influence BV/TV and trabecular anisotropy. By establishing clear patterns of trabecular variation between shod and unshod modern humans, this study provides a robust comparative framework for interpreting locomotor behavior in fossil hominins, while highlighting the need to further disentangle the effects of footwear from differences in body size, stature, subsistence strategy, and other aspects of lifestyle among human populations. Recognizing how habitual behavior influences internal bone architecture is essential for reconstructing past movement patterns and understanding the evolutionary pathways of bipedalism.

鞋对人距骨小梁结构的影响。
习惯性两足行走的进化是人类历史上一个决定性的里程碑,然而化石证据表明,两足行走的实践方式存在着实质性的差异。小梁骨在整个生命周期中对关节的载荷和方向作出反应,为研究这些差异提供了有力的方法。然而,解释古人类化石的变异,需要一个可靠的现代人种内变异基线,以解释生活方式、流动性和习惯行为的差异。许多现代骨骼收藏来自后工业化人群,他们的活动模式、鞋类使用和健康状况与过去的人群明显不同,这可能会使解释产生偏差。因此,习惯穿鞋的后工业化人类可能不是早期人类所经历的负重环境的最佳代表,而不穿鞋的个体则提供了更接近赤脚运动的方式。为了探索鞋类对内部骨骼结构的影响,我们使用高分辨率微计算机断层扫描,研究了来自安达曼岛、科伊桑和阿卡人群的习惯性穿鞋现代人(N = 40)和习惯性不穿鞋现代人(N = 16)的骨骨小梁结构,这些人代表了不同的生态和生存环境。骨小梁参数-包括骨体积分数(BV/TV),相对BV/TV (rBV/TV),骨小梁厚度(Tb。Th),分离(Tb)。Sp),数(Tb)。N)和各向异性程度(DA)-使用规范整体形态计量分析(cHMA)进行量化。穿鞋的人表现出更高的平均BV/TV和更大的BV/TV变异性,这表明距骨在两足步态中起着沉重的负重作用,不同类型的鞋子会在脚踝上产生不同的力分布。rBV/TV的空间分布进一步揭示了两组之间的差异:穿鞋者距骨内侧和后部的rBV/TV较高,与踝关节背屈和内侧负重的姿势一致,而不穿鞋者距骨头部和颈部的rBV/TV较高,可能反映了下蹲或攀爬的负荷。穿鞋个体也表现出更高的平均DA,表明小梁的组织和方向约束更强。穿鞋组的平均BV/TV同样更高,主要是由于小梁厚度更大,因为各组之间小梁的分离和数量大致相似,这表明与鞋类相关的负荷差异主要影响BV/TV和小梁各向异性。通过建立穿鞋和不穿鞋的现代人的骨小梁差异的清晰模式,本研究为解释古人类化石的运动行为提供了一个强有力的比较框架,同时强调了进一步理清鞋类对人类体型、身材、生存策略和其他生活方式差异的影响的必要性。认识到习惯行为如何影响内部骨骼结构对于重建过去的运动模式和理解两足动物的进化途径至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Anatomy
Journal of Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
183
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Anatomy is an international peer-reviewed journal sponsored by the Anatomical Society. The journal publishes original papers, invited review articles and book reviews. Its main focus is to understand anatomy through an analysis of structure, function, development and evolution. Priority will be given to studies of that clearly articulate their relevance to the anatomical community. Focal areas include: experimental studies, contributions based on molecular and cell biology and on the application of modern imaging techniques and papers with novel methods or synthetic perspective on an anatomical system. Studies that are essentially descriptive anatomy are appropriate only if they communicate clearly a broader functional or evolutionary significance. You must clearly state the broader implications of your work in the abstract. We particularly welcome submissions in the following areas: Cell biology and tissue architecture Comparative functional morphology Developmental biology Evolutionary developmental biology Evolutionary morphology Functional human anatomy Integrative vertebrate paleontology Methodological innovations in anatomical research Musculoskeletal system Neuroanatomy and neurodegeneration Significant advances in anatomical education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书