The Potency of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing and Evaluating the Severity of Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Indian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-31 DOI:10.4103/ijd.ijd_430_25
Maureen M Stella, Arief Budiyanto, Agnes Rp Sari, Shinta T Dewi, Yohanes W Wirohadidjojo
{"title":"The Potency of Artificial Intelligence in Diagnosing and Evaluating the Severity of Vitiligo: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Maureen M Stella, Arief Budiyanto, Agnes Rp Sari, Shinta T Dewi, Yohanes W Wirohadidjojo","doi":"10.4103/ijd.ijd_430_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neural networks (NNs), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), have the ability to assess the severity of vitiligo and improve diagnosis accuracy. In contrast to human physicians' diagnosis, which is primarily based on subjective assessment, standardised and objective diagnostic methods are needed to provide an accurate diagnosis and grade the severity of vitiligo. The aim of this study is to analyse the sensitivity and specificity of AI in vitiligo diagnosis and severity assessment. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was followed to screen literature in several databases: Proquest, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, SAGE, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect. Human studies that investigated the potential of AI in vitiligo diagnosis were included in vitiligo diagnosis were included. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 and RStudio, and risk of bias tools were used to assess study bias. Certainty of evidence was analysed using GRADE. The systematic review consisted of 15 studies, and seven studies were statistically analysed. The most studied NNs were Inception V3 (n = 2), visual geometry group (n = 2), and ResNet (n = 2). The overall sensitivity ranged from 72.5% to 99.7%, with a pooled sensitivity of 95.5%. Specificity ranged from 72% to 99.9%, with a pooled specificity of 97%. Among the evaluated models, Inception V3 showed the highest diagnostic performance. The summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC) from multiple analyses showed an area under the curve of 0.96. AI showed potential in diagnosing and evaluating the severity of vitiligo.</p>","PeriodicalId":13401,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"71 5","pages":"335-347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549697/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_430_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Neural networks (NNs), a subset of artificial intelligence (AI), have the ability to assess the severity of vitiligo and improve diagnosis accuracy. In contrast to human physicians' diagnosis, which is primarily based on subjective assessment, standardised and objective diagnostic methods are needed to provide an accurate diagnosis and grade the severity of vitiligo. The aim of this study is to analyse the sensitivity and specificity of AI in vitiligo diagnosis and severity assessment. The PRISMA 2020 protocol was followed to screen literature in several databases: Proquest, PubMed, Taylor and Francis, SAGE, JSTOR, and ScienceDirect. Human studies that investigated the potential of AI in vitiligo diagnosis were included in vitiligo diagnosis were included. Statistical analysis was carried out using RevMan 5.4 and RStudio, and risk of bias tools were used to assess study bias. Certainty of evidence was analysed using GRADE. The systematic review consisted of 15 studies, and seven studies were statistically analysed. The most studied NNs were Inception V3 (n = 2), visual geometry group (n = 2), and ResNet (n = 2). The overall sensitivity ranged from 72.5% to 99.7%, with a pooled sensitivity of 95.5%. Specificity ranged from 72% to 99.9%, with a pooled specificity of 97%. Among the evaluated models, Inception V3 showed the highest diagnostic performance. The summary receiver operating characteristics curve (SROC) from multiple analyses showed an area under the curve of 0.96. AI showed potential in diagnosing and evaluating the severity of vitiligo.

人工智能在诊断和评估白癜风严重程度中的效力:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
神经网络(NNs)是人工智能(AI)的一个子集,具有评估白癜风严重程度和提高诊断准确性的能力。与人类医生的诊断主要基于主观评估相比,需要标准化和客观的诊断方法来提供准确的诊断和白癜风的严重程度分级。本研究的目的是分析人工智能在白癜风诊断和严重程度评估中的敏感性和特异性。遵循PRISMA 2020方案筛选几个数据库中的文献:Proquest、PubMed、Taylor and Francis、SAGE、JSTOR和ScienceDirect。研究人工智能在白癜风诊断中的潜力的人类研究被纳入白癜风诊断。使用RevMan 5.4和RStudio进行统计分析,并使用偏倚风险工具评估研究偏倚。使用GRADE分析证据的确定性。系统综述包括15项研究,其中7项研究进行统计分析。研究最多的神经网络是Inception V3 (n = 2)、visual geometry group (n = 2)和ResNet (n = 2)。总灵敏度为72.5% ~ 99.7%,总灵敏度为95.5%。特异性从72%到99.9%不等,合并特异性为97%。在评估的模型中,Inception V3显示出最高的诊断性能。综合受试者工作特征曲线(SROC)显示曲线下面积为0.96。人工智能在诊断和评估白癜风的严重程度方面显示出潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Indian Journal of Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes information related to skin-pathology and different modes of therapeutics, including dermatosurgery and cosmetic dermatology. Likewise, it carries articles on leprosy, STI and HIV/AIDS. The editorial board encourages the authors to publish articles addressing emerging techniques and developments in the subject specialty, in the form of Original investigations, Narrative and Systematic Reviews as well as Case Reports. The journal aims at publishing Editorials and Commentaries from eminent personalities on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书