'Cutting Through the Roots': A Critical Appraisal of Transverse and Vertical Sectioning Techniques of Scalp Biopsy for Primary Alopecia.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 DERMATOLOGY
Indian Journal of Dermatology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-08-31 DOI:10.4103/ijd.ijd_450_25
Seetu Palo
{"title":"'Cutting Through the Roots': A Critical Appraisal of Transverse and Vertical Sectioning Techniques of Scalp Biopsy for Primary Alopecia.","authors":"Seetu Palo","doi":"10.4103/ijd.ijd_450_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Alopecia, a prevalent and distressing condition with diverse aetiologies, encompasses both scarring and non-scarring types and necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management. Apart from optimal biopsy site selection based on clinical suspicion, such as active borders for scarring alopecias and lesion borders for non-scarring alopecias, choice of appropriate method for grossing of alopecic scalp biopsies also forms a key step. Historically, debates on 'One (biopsy) Vs Two (biopsies)' and 'Vertical/Longitudinal Vs Horizontal/Transverse' sections persist, each approach carrying its advantages and disadvantages. Traditional methods, such as those proposed by Headington and Whiting, describe the landmarks for slicing a biopsy for transverse section. Newer innovative strategies, including the HoVert technique and the Tyler technique, aim to obtain both vertical and horizontal sections from a single biopsy. This article meticulously presents all the methodologies employed in the grossing of alopecic scalp biopsies in a simplified manner, presents a comprehensive overview of their strengths and limitations, and offers evidence-based recommendation for choosing optimal grossing techniques based on clinical scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":13401,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","volume":"71 5","pages":"403-409"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13549692/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijd.ijd_450_25","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/8/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alopecia, a prevalent and distressing condition with diverse aetiologies, encompasses both scarring and non-scarring types and necessitates accurate diagnostic approaches for effective management. Apart from optimal biopsy site selection based on clinical suspicion, such as active borders for scarring alopecias and lesion borders for non-scarring alopecias, choice of appropriate method for grossing of alopecic scalp biopsies also forms a key step. Historically, debates on 'One (biopsy) Vs Two (biopsies)' and 'Vertical/Longitudinal Vs Horizontal/Transverse' sections persist, each approach carrying its advantages and disadvantages. Traditional methods, such as those proposed by Headington and Whiting, describe the landmarks for slicing a biopsy for transverse section. Newer innovative strategies, including the HoVert technique and the Tyler technique, aim to obtain both vertical and horizontal sections from a single biopsy. This article meticulously presents all the methodologies employed in the grossing of alopecic scalp biopsies in a simplified manner, presents a comprehensive overview of their strengths and limitations, and offers evidence-based recommendation for choosing optimal grossing techniques based on clinical scenarios.

“切断根部”:对原发性脱发头皮活检横向和纵向切片技术的批判性评价。
脱发是一种普遍和令人痛苦的疾病,具有多种病因,包括疤痕和非疤痕类型,需要准确的诊断方法进行有效的管理。除了根据临床怀疑选择最佳活检部位,如瘢痕性脱发的活动边界和非瘢痕性脱发的病变边界外,选择合适的方法进行脱发头皮活检也是关键的一步。历史上,关于“一次(活检)Vs两次(活检)”和“垂直/纵向Vs水平/横向”切片的争论一直存在,每种方法都有其优点和缺点。传统的方法,如Headington和Whiting提出的方法,描述了横切面切片活检的标志。较新的创新策略,包括HoVert技术和Tyler技术,旨在从一次活检中获得垂直和水平切片。本文以一种简单的方式详细介绍了脱发头皮活检中使用的所有方法,全面概述了它们的优势和局限性,并根据临床情况提供了选择最佳治疗技术的循证建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Dermatology
Indian Journal of Dermatology Medicine-Dermatology
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
47 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal publishes information related to skin-pathology and different modes of therapeutics, including dermatosurgery and cosmetic dermatology. Likewise, it carries articles on leprosy, STI and HIV/AIDS. The editorial board encourages the authors to publish articles addressing emerging techniques and developments in the subject specialty, in the form of Original investigations, Narrative and Systematic Reviews as well as Case Reports. The journal aims at publishing Editorials and Commentaries from eminent personalities on a regular basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书