Areum Hwang, Hyeontaek Hwang, Dong-Hyun Joo, Ye Jin Lee, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Nakwon Kwak, Jae-Joon Yim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Jae Ho Lee
{"title":"Immediate Treatment Versus Watchful Waiting in Mycobacterium avium Complex Pulmonary Disease: A Propensity Score Matched Analysis.","authors":"Areum Hwang, Hyeontaek Hwang, Dong-Hyun Joo, Ye Jin Lee, Byoung Soo Kwon, Yeon Wook Kim, Jong Sun Park, Nakwon Kwak, Jae-Joon Yim, Hyung-Jun Kim, Jae Ho Lee","doi":"10.1007/s40121-026-01433-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The optimal timing for initiating antibiotic therapy in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) remains controversial. While previous studies advocate for \"watchful waiting\" in some cases, specific criteria to prioritize immediate treatment over observation are not well defined.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed 592 treatment-naïve patients with MAC-PD diagnosed between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between patients receiving immediate treatment (initiated ≤ 2 months [60 days] of diagnosis) and those undergoing watchful waiting. Primary outcomes were all-cause and respiratory mortality; secondary outcomes included culture conversion and adverse events.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After matching, 102 pairs were analyzed. Immediate treatment was associated with significantly faster culture conversion [hazard ratio (HR) 3.07; 95% CI 1.68-5.61] but a higher incidence of adverse events (64.7% vs. 41.2%; P = 0.001). In the overall matched population, immediate treatment did not improve all-cause (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.53-1.61) or respiratory mortality (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-1.14). However, in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe disease (BACES score ≥ 2), immediate treatment was significantly associated with reduced all-cause (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.96) and respiratory mortality (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.90).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Immediate treatment accelerates culture conversion but increases AEs without improving overall survival, supporting watchful waiting for mild cases. However, patients with a BACES score ≥ 2 derive significant survival benefit from immediate therapy, suggesting the BACES score is an effective tool for guiding treatment timing. Regardless of the initial treatment decision, close and regular monitoring remains essential, as some patients will ultimately require treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13592,"journal":{"name":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","volume":" ","pages":"3057-3071"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13658716/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infectious Diseases and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40121-026-01433-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/9/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: The optimal timing for initiating antibiotic therapy in Mycobacterium avium complex pulmonary disease (MAC-PD) remains controversial. While previous studies advocate for "watchful waiting" in some cases, specific criteria to prioritize immediate treatment over observation are not well defined.
Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 592 treatment-naïve patients with MAC-PD diagnosed between 2003 and 2021. Propensity score matching was used to balance baseline characteristics between patients receiving immediate treatment (initiated ≤ 2 months [60 days] of diagnosis) and those undergoing watchful waiting. Primary outcomes were all-cause and respiratory mortality; secondary outcomes included culture conversion and adverse events.
Results: After matching, 102 pairs were analyzed. Immediate treatment was associated with significantly faster culture conversion [hazard ratio (HR) 3.07; 95% CI 1.68-5.61] but a higher incidence of adverse events (64.7% vs. 41.2%; P = 0.001). In the overall matched population, immediate treatment did not improve all-cause (HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.53-1.61) or respiratory mortality (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-1.14). However, in the subgroup of patients with moderate-to-severe disease (BACES score ≥ 2), immediate treatment was significantly associated with reduced all-cause (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.96) and respiratory mortality (HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.90).
Conclusions: Immediate treatment accelerates culture conversion but increases AEs without improving overall survival, supporting watchful waiting for mild cases. However, patients with a BACES score ≥ 2 derive significant survival benefit from immediate therapy, suggesting the BACES score is an effective tool for guiding treatment timing. Regardless of the initial treatment decision, close and regular monitoring remains essential, as some patients will ultimately require treatment.
鸟分枝杆菌复杂肺部疾病(MAC-PD)的最佳抗生素治疗时机仍存在争议。虽然以前的研究提倡在某些情况下“观察等待”,但优先考虑立即治疗而不是观察的具体标准并没有很好地定义。方法:回顾性分析2003年至2021年间诊断为MAC-PD的592例treatment-naïve患者。倾向评分匹配用于平衡立即接受治疗(诊断开始≤2个月[60天])和观察等待患者的基线特征。主要结局是全因死亡率和呼吸系统死亡率;次要结局包括文化转化和不良事件。结果:配对后,分析了102对。立即治疗与培养转化显著加快相关[风险比(HR) 3.07;95% CI 1.68-5.61]但不良事件发生率较高(64.7%比41.2%;P = 0.001)。在总体匹配人群中,立即治疗并没有改善全因死亡率(HR 0.92; 95% CI 0.53-1.61)或呼吸系统死亡率(HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.19-1.14)。然而,在中重度疾病(BACES评分≥2)患者亚组中,立即治疗与全因死亡率(HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.30-0.96)和呼吸系统死亡率(HR 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.90)降低显著相关。结论:立即治疗加速了培养转化,但增加了ae,但没有改善总生存期,支持观察等待轻度病例。然而,BACES评分≥2的患者从立即治疗中获得显著的生存获益,这表明BACES评分是指导治疗时机的有效工具。无论最初的治疗决定如何,密切和定期监测仍然至关重要,因为一些患者最终将需要治疗。
期刊介绍:
Infectious Diseases and Therapy is an international, open access, peer-reviewed, rapid publication journal dedicated to the publication of high-quality clinical (all phases), observational, real-world, and health outcomes research around the discovery, development, and use of infectious disease therapies and interventions, including vaccines and devices. Studies relating to diagnostic products and diagnosis, pharmacoeconomics, public health, epidemiology, quality of life, and patient care, management, and education are also encouraged.
Areas of focus include, but are not limited to, bacterial and fungal infections, viral infections (including HIV/AIDS and hepatitis), parasitological diseases, tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases, vaccinations and other interventions, and drug-resistance, chronic infections, epidemiology and tropical, emergent, pediatric, dermal and sexually-transmitted diseases.