Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Use of Rituximab in Pemphigus among Indian Dermatologists: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Survey.

IF 2 Q3 DERMATOLOGY
Dipankar De, Narayanan Baskaran, Rahul Mahajan, Abir Saraswat, Deepika Pandhi, Geeti Khullar, Kolalapudi Seetharam Anjaneyulu, Manas Chatterjee, Manjunath Shenoy, Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Nayeem Sadath Haneef, Nilay Kanti Das, Raghavendra Rao, Sheetanshu Kumar, Shekhar Neema, Shyamanta Barua, Sujay Khandpur, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Vishal Gupta, Sanjeev Handa
{"title":"Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice of Use of Rituximab in Pemphigus among Indian Dermatologists: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Survey.","authors":"Dipankar De, Narayanan Baskaran, Rahul Mahajan, Abir Saraswat, Deepika Pandhi, Geeti Khullar, Kolalapudi Seetharam Anjaneyulu, Manas Chatterjee, Manjunath Shenoy, Murlidhar Rajagopalan, Nayeem Sadath Haneef, Nilay Kanti Das, Raghavendra Rao, Sheetanshu Kumar, Shekhar Neema, Shyamanta Barua, Sujay Khandpur, Vinay Keshavamurthy, Vishal Gupta, Sanjeev Handa","doi":"10.4103/idoj.idoj_631_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab has changed the paradigm for management of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Despite its widespread use, variability exists in its use, particularly related to dosing protocols, prophylaxis, and use in special populations. This study aimed to assess dermatologists' knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding rituximab in India.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Indian dermatologists with at least six months of clinical experience post-residency between March and June 2024. An 85-question survey was used to gather information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to rituximab. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data and identify practice variations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-five dermatologists with a mean practice experience of 13 years participated. Most (78.2%) preferred rituximab as first-line adjuvant for PV, citing higher remission rates and fewer long-term adverse effects. Knowledge of rituximab's mechanism of action was excellent. However, significant practice variability was observed. The standard dose rheumatoid arthritis protocol for moderate-to-severe disease was preferred by 69.1%, whereas only 14.5% strongly supported low-dose regimens. Screening for latent tuberculosis was commonly performed (80%). Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and vaccination practices were inconsistent, with only 12.7% always prescribing prophylaxis. Additionally, 61.8% used rituximab retreatment on clinical relapse, with less emphasis on immunological markers for monitoring.</p><p><strong>Limitations: </strong>The responses may not be representative of all dermatologists, especially those with less experience with rituximab.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While dermatologists demonstrated strong knowledge of rituximab, significant variability in dosing, prophylaxis, and retreatment practices exists. Standardized guidelines and educational initiatives may be needed to ensure consistent use of rituximab and improve patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":13335,"journal":{"name":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Dermatology Online Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/idoj.idoj_631_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Rituximab has changed the paradigm for management of pemphigus vulgaris (PV). Despite its widespread use, variability exists in its use, particularly related to dosing protocols, prophylaxis, and use in special populations. This study aimed to assess dermatologists' knowledge, attitude, and practices regarding rituximab in India.

Materials and methods: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based survey was conducted among Indian dermatologists with at least six months of clinical experience post-residency between March and June 2024. An 85-question survey was used to gather information on knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to rituximab. Descriptive statistics were employed to analyze the data and identify practice variations.

Results: Fifty-five dermatologists with a mean practice experience of 13 years participated. Most (78.2%) preferred rituximab as first-line adjuvant for PV, citing higher remission rates and fewer long-term adverse effects. Knowledge of rituximab's mechanism of action was excellent. However, significant practice variability was observed. The standard dose rheumatoid arthritis protocol for moderate-to-severe disease was preferred by 69.1%, whereas only 14.5% strongly supported low-dose regimens. Screening for latent tuberculosis was commonly performed (80%). Prophylaxis for Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia and vaccination practices were inconsistent, with only 12.7% always prescribing prophylaxis. Additionally, 61.8% used rituximab retreatment on clinical relapse, with less emphasis on immunological markers for monitoring.

Limitations: The responses may not be representative of all dermatologists, especially those with less experience with rituximab.

Conclusion: While dermatologists demonstrated strong knowledge of rituximab, significant variability in dosing, prophylaxis, and retreatment practices exists. Standardized guidelines and educational initiatives may be needed to ensure consistent use of rituximab and improve patient outcomes.

印度皮肤科医生使用利妥昔单抗治疗天疱疮的知识、态度和实践:一项基于横断面问卷的调查。
背景:利妥昔单抗已经改变了寻常性天疱疮(PV)的治疗模式。尽管其广泛使用,但其使用存在变异性,特别是与给药方案、预防和特殊人群的使用有关。本研究旨在评估印度皮肤科医生对利妥昔单抗的知识、态度和做法。材料和方法:在2024年3月至6月期间,对具有至少六个月临床经验的印度皮肤科医生进行了横断面问卷调查。一项85个问题的调查用于收集有关利妥昔单抗的知识、态度和实践的信息。描述性统计用于分析数据和识别实践变化。结果:55名皮肤科医生参与,平均执业经验为13年。大多数(78.2%)首选利妥昔单抗作为PV的一线辅助治疗,理由是缓解率更高,长期不良反应更少。对利妥昔单抗的作用机制有很好的了解。然而,观察到显著的实践变异性。69.1%的人首选标准剂量类风湿性关节炎方案治疗中重度疾病,而只有14.5%的人强烈支持低剂量方案。通常进行潜伏结核筛查(80%)。耶洛维奇肺囊虫肺炎的预防和疫苗接种做法不一致,只有12.7%的人总是开预防处方。此外,61.8%的患者在临床复发时使用利妥昔单抗再治疗,较少强调免疫标志物的监测。局限性:这些反应可能不能代表所有皮肤科医生,特别是那些使用利妥昔单抗经验较少的医生。结论:虽然皮肤科医生对利妥昔单抗有很强的了解,但在剂量、预防和再治疗实践方面存在显著的差异。可能需要标准化的指南和教育举措来确保利妥昔单抗的持续使用并改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
201
审稿时长
49 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书