Electroencephalographic Signatures of Methylphenidate in ADHD: A Systematic Review and 10 Recommendations for Future Research.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Declan M Quinn, Clodagh Earley, Iulia-Mara Scarlat, Robert Whelan, Jane McGrath
{"title":"Electroencephalographic Signatures of Methylphenidate in ADHD: A Systematic Review and 10 Recommendations for Future Research.","authors":"Declan M Quinn, Clodagh Earley, Iulia-Mara Scarlat, Robert Whelan, Jane McGrath","doi":"10.1177/10870547261483457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Methylphenidate is the first-line treatment for ADHD, yet its neurocognitive mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to examine methylphenidate's effects on brain function and has been proposed as a potential tool for monitoring treatment response. This systematic review addressed whether EEG can (a) clarify methylphenidate's neurocognitive mechanisms and (b) serve as a biomarker of treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024538039) searched six databases for English-language studies published after 1994. Included studies involved individuals with ADHD, used within-subject designs with acute methylphenidate administration, and collected resting-state or task-based EEG. Assessment of study quality and risk of bias assessment was conducted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-four studies were included. The most consistent finding was an increase in P3 amplitude following methylphenidate administration, observed in eleven of twenty P3 studies. In contrast, there was little evidence to support effects on early sensory processing, movement planning or response monitoring event-related potentials. Findings from quantitative EEG and event-related spectral perturbation analyses were limited, with either no effect observed, or a paucity of studies in some frequency bands.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Methylphenidate reliably increased P3 amplitude across tasks, suggesting an improvement in higher order cognitive functioning. However, the P3 does not meet criteria for a pharmacodynamic or surrogate endpoint biomarker in this context, and the current evidence does not support EEG as a treatment-response biomarker for MPH in ADHD. Based on our findings, we make 10 recommendations for future research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":15237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Attention Disorders","volume":" ","pages":"10870547261483457"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Attention Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10870547261483457","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Methylphenidate is the first-line treatment for ADHD, yet its neurocognitive mechanisms remain incompletely understood. Electroencephalography (EEG) has been used to examine methylphenidate's effects on brain function and has been proposed as a potential tool for monitoring treatment response. This systematic review addressed whether EEG can (a) clarify methylphenidate's neurocognitive mechanisms and (b) serve as a biomarker of treatment response.

Methods: A PRISMA-compliant systematic review (PROSPERO: CRD42024538039) searched six databases for English-language studies published after 1994. Included studies involved individuals with ADHD, used within-subject designs with acute methylphenidate administration, and collected resting-state or task-based EEG. Assessment of study quality and risk of bias assessment was conducted.

Results: Forty-four studies were included. The most consistent finding was an increase in P3 amplitude following methylphenidate administration, observed in eleven of twenty P3 studies. In contrast, there was little evidence to support effects on early sensory processing, movement planning or response monitoring event-related potentials. Findings from quantitative EEG and event-related spectral perturbation analyses were limited, with either no effect observed, or a paucity of studies in some frequency bands.

Discussion: Methylphenidate reliably increased P3 amplitude across tasks, suggesting an improvement in higher order cognitive functioning. However, the P3 does not meet criteria for a pharmacodynamic or surrogate endpoint biomarker in this context, and the current evidence does not support EEG as a treatment-response biomarker for MPH in ADHD. Based on our findings, we make 10 recommendations for future research in this area.

哌甲酯在ADHD中的脑电图特征:一项系统综述和对未来研究的10项建议。
目的:哌甲酯是ADHD的一线治疗药物,但其神经认知机制尚不完全清楚。脑电图(EEG)已被用于检查哌甲酯对脑功能的影响,并已被提议作为监测治疗反应的潜在工具。本系统综述探讨了脑电图是否可以(a)阐明哌甲酯的神经认知机制和(b)作为治疗反应的生物标志物。方法:一项符合prisma标准的系统评价(PROSPERO: CRD42024538039)检索了6个数据库中1994年以后发表的英语研究。纳入的研究涉及ADHD患者,采用急性哌甲酯给药的受试者内设计,并收集静息状态或基于任务的脑电图。进行研究质量评价和偏倚风险评价。结果:纳入44项研究。最一致的发现是服用哌甲酯后P3振幅增加,在20个P3研究中有11个观察到。相比之下,几乎没有证据支持对早期感觉加工、运动计划或反应监测事件相关电位的影响。定量脑电图和事件相关谱摄动分析的结果是有限的,要么没有观察到影响,要么在某些频段缺乏研究。讨论:哌甲酯可靠地增加了跨任务的P3振幅,表明高阶认知功能的改善。然而,在这种情况下,P3不符合药效学或替代终点生物标志物的标准,并且目前的证据不支持EEG作为ADHD患者MPH的治疗反应生物标志物。基于我们的研究结果,我们对这一领域的未来研究提出了10条建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
71
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Attention Disorders (JAD) focuses on basic and applied science concerning attention and related functions in children, adolescents, and adults. JAD publishes articles on diagnosis, comorbidity, neuropsychological functioning, psychopharmacology, and psychosocial issues. The journal also addresses practice, policy, and theory, as well as review articles, commentaries, in-depth analyses, empirical research articles, and case presentations or program evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书