Alice Greenwood, Johan van der Meer, Sarah Ward, Michael Breakspear, Eamonn Eeles
{"title":"Brain Dynamics During Delirium: An Exploratory Study.","authors":"Alice Greenwood, Johan van der Meer, Sarah Ward, Michael Breakspear, Eamonn Eeles","doi":"10.2174/0118746098390958251126070313","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Disrupted Brain dynamics are implicated in delirium. We aimed to better understand the characteristics of functional brain activity as a model for delirium.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Measurement of functional brain connectivity at rest and during task-based activities in acutely delirious patients in a convenience sample of patients with delirium versus controls. Dynamic jumps between discrete brain states were modelled using the hidden Markov modelling (HMM), an analytical framework that posits the existence of distinct states. Fractional occupancy (FO); the percentage (%) of time any state was active, lifetime; the average time in a given state and switchrate; number of switches per minute, were calculated during rest and task.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eleven patients were recruited, six had delirium. In the delirious group, 3 were female and the average age was 81 years. In the non-delirious group, 3 were female and the average age was 82 years. Fractional occupancy was no different between delirious and controls across the 10 canonical states (range p=0.09-0.89). Lifetime state dwell time was no different between delirium and controls (range of p=0.11-0.96). The switchrate between all states was no different between delirious cases and controls at rest (6.76 vs. 6.71; p=0.1) and during task (7.26 vs. 7.92; p=0.71). Delirium severity and switchrate correlation was r=-0.29; p=0.39.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A functional MRI paradigm including incorporation of novel task state has shown proof of principle in delirium. Whilst there has been previously shown to be hierarchical dissolution during delirium, there was no difference in functional brain activity shown in this study. The study was approved by the Metro North Reviewing Ethics Committee [Ref No: HREC/17/QRBW/622].</p>","PeriodicalId":11008,"journal":{"name":"Current aging science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current aging science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0118746098390958251126070313","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Disrupted Brain dynamics are implicated in delirium. We aimed to better understand the characteristics of functional brain activity as a model for delirium.
Methods: Measurement of functional brain connectivity at rest and during task-based activities in acutely delirious patients in a convenience sample of patients with delirium versus controls. Dynamic jumps between discrete brain states were modelled using the hidden Markov modelling (HMM), an analytical framework that posits the existence of distinct states. Fractional occupancy (FO); the percentage (%) of time any state was active, lifetime; the average time in a given state and switchrate; number of switches per minute, were calculated during rest and task.
Results: Eleven patients were recruited, six had delirium. In the delirious group, 3 were female and the average age was 81 years. In the non-delirious group, 3 were female and the average age was 82 years. Fractional occupancy was no different between delirious and controls across the 10 canonical states (range p=0.09-0.89). Lifetime state dwell time was no different between delirium and controls (range of p=0.11-0.96). The switchrate between all states was no different between delirious cases and controls at rest (6.76 vs. 6.71; p=0.1) and during task (7.26 vs. 7.92; p=0.71). Delirium severity and switchrate correlation was r=-0.29; p=0.39.
Conclusion: A functional MRI paradigm including incorporation of novel task state has shown proof of principle in delirium. Whilst there has been previously shown to be hierarchical dissolution during delirium, there was no difference in functional brain activity shown in this study. The study was approved by the Metro North Reviewing Ethics Committee [Ref No: HREC/17/QRBW/622].
目的:脑动力学紊乱与谵妄有关。我们的目标是更好地理解作为谵妄模型的功能性脑活动的特征。方法:测量急性谵妄患者休息和任务型活动时的脑功能连通性,将谵妄患者与对照组作为方便样本。使用隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)对离散大脑状态之间的动态跳跃进行建模,隐马尔可夫模型是一种假设存在不同状态的分析框架。分数占用(FO);任何状态处于活动状态的时间百分比(%),寿命;给定状态下的平均时间和开关率;在休息和任务时计算每分钟的开关次数。结果:共纳入11例患者,其中6例出现谵妄。谵妄组女性3例,平均年龄81岁。非谵妄组女性3例,平均年龄82岁。在10个典型状态中,谵妄患者和对照组的占用率没有差异(p=0.09-0.89)。谵妄患者与对照组生命状态停留时间差异无统计学意义(p=0.11-0.96)。谵妄病例和对照组在休息时(6.76 vs. 6.71, p=0.1)和任务时(7.26 vs. 7.92, p=0.71)所有状态之间的切换率没有差异。谵妄严重程度与切换率相关r=-0.29;p = 0.39。结论:包含新任务状态的功能性MRI范式在谵妄中显示了原理证明。虽然先前已经证明在谵妄期间有分层分解,但在这项研究中没有发现功能性大脑活动的差异。该研究得到了Metro North审查伦理委员会的批准[参考号:HREC/17/QRBW/622]。