Rapid Antifungal Susceptibility Classification of Aspergillus Species Using AI-Assisted Analysis of Routine MALDI-TOF MS Spectra: A Proof-of-Concept Study.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Hyeyoung Lee, Donggun Seo, Hyun Ji Lee, Hyunjoo Lee, Sung-Il Cho, Jehyun Koo, Kei-Anne Garcia Baritugo, Gi-Ho Sung, Dong-Chan Kim, Jayoung Kim
{"title":"Rapid Antifungal Susceptibility Classification of <i>Aspergillus</i> Species Using AI-Assisted Analysis of Routine MALDI-TOF MS Spectra: A Proof-of-Concept Study.","authors":"Hyeyoung Lee, Donggun Seo, Hyun Ji Lee, Hyunjoo Lee, Sung-Il Cho, Jehyun Koo, Kei-Anne Garcia Baritugo, Gi-Ho Sung, Dong-Chan Kim, Jayoung Kim","doi":"10.3343/alm.2026.0069","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing prevalence of antifungal-resistant <i>Aspergillus</i> isolates underscores the need for rapid antifungal susceptibility testing. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated whether artificial intelligence (AI) can enable rapid antifungal susceptibility classification of <i>Aspergillus</i> species using routine matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Models were developed using MALDI-TOF MS spectra for 240 isolates (<i>Aspergillus flavus</i> N=126, <i>A. fumigatus</i> N=75, <i>Aspergillus lentulus</i> N=39). Their performance in predicting susceptibility to four antifungal agents (voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B) was evaluated using a validation set comprising <i>A. flavus</i> (N=24), <i>A. fumigatus</i> (N=24), and <i>A. lentulus</i> (N=22), based on categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME), sensitivity, and specificity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although spectrum-level evaluation showed excellent analytical discrimination, isolate-level clinical evaluation demonstrated limited performance across seven species-antifungal agent combinations. Across these combinations, the AI models achieved a mean CA of 56.0%, with VME and ME rates of 53.3% and 45.2%, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 0% to 100% and specificity from 18.2% to 87.5%, indicating inconsistent susceptibility classification performance across species-antifungal agent combinations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AI-assisted analysis of routine MALDI-TOF MS spectra showed the feasibility of classifying antifungal susceptibility in <i>Aspergillus</i> spp. However, its clinical performance across species-antifungal agent combinations was limited. Further optimization, evaluation with larger multicenter datasets, and external validation are required before considering clinical adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":8421,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3343/alm.2026.0069","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasing prevalence of antifungal-resistant Aspergillus isolates underscores the need for rapid antifungal susceptibility testing. In this proof-of-concept study, we evaluated whether artificial intelligence (AI) can enable rapid antifungal susceptibility classification of Aspergillus species using routine matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS).

Methods: Models were developed using MALDI-TOF MS spectra for 240 isolates (Aspergillus flavus N=126, A. fumigatus N=75, Aspergillus lentulus N=39). Their performance in predicting susceptibility to four antifungal agents (voriconazole, posaconazole, itraconazole, and amphotericin B) was evaluated using a validation set comprising A. flavus (N=24), A. fumigatus (N=24), and A. lentulus (N=22), based on categorical agreement (CA), very major error (VME), major error (ME), sensitivity, and specificity.

Results: Although spectrum-level evaluation showed excellent analytical discrimination, isolate-level clinical evaluation demonstrated limited performance across seven species-antifungal agent combinations. Across these combinations, the AI models achieved a mean CA of 56.0%, with VME and ME rates of 53.3% and 45.2%, respectively. Sensitivity ranged from 0% to 100% and specificity from 18.2% to 87.5%, indicating inconsistent susceptibility classification performance across species-antifungal agent combinations.

Conclusions: AI-assisted analysis of routine MALDI-TOF MS spectra showed the feasibility of classifying antifungal susceptibility in Aspergillus spp. However, its clinical performance across species-antifungal agent combinations was limited. Further optimization, evaluation with larger multicenter datasets, and external validation are required before considering clinical adoption.

使用人工智能辅助分析常规MALDI-TOF质谱的曲霉种的快速抗真菌敏感性分类:概念验证研究。
背景:抗真菌耐药曲霉分离株的日益流行强调了快速抗真菌药敏试验的必要性。在这项概念验证研究中,我们评估了人工智能(AI)是否可以使用常规基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)对曲霉物种进行快速抗真菌敏感性分类。方法:采用MALDI-TOF质谱法对240株黄曲霉126株、烟曲霉75株、香菇曲霉39株进行建模。采用a . flavus (N=24)、a . fumigatus (N=24)和a . lentulus (N=22)组成的验证集,基于分类一致性(CA)、非常严重误差(VME)、严重误差(ME)、敏感性和特异性,评估了它们对四种抗真菌药物(伏立康唑、泊沙康唑、伊曲康唑和两性霉素B)的敏感性。结果:虽然光谱水平的评价显示了良好的分析辨别能力,但分离水平的临床评价表明,7种抗真菌药物组合的性能有限。在这些组合中,AI模型的平均CA为56.0%,VME和ME率分别为53.3%和45.2%。敏感性范围为0% ~ 100%,特异性范围为18.2% ~ 87.5%,表明不同种类抗真菌药物组合的药敏分类性能不一致。结论:人工智能辅助分析常规MALDI-TOF质谱显示了曲霉药敏性分类的可行性,但其在不同种类抗真菌药物组合中的临床应用受到限制。在考虑临床应用之前,需要进一步优化,使用更大的多中心数据集进行评估,并进行外部验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Laboratory Medicine
Annals of Laboratory Medicine MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
12.20%
发文量
100
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Laboratory Medicine is the official journal of Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. The journal title has been recently changed from the Korean Journal of Laboratory Medicine (ISSN, 1598-6535) from the January issue of 2012. The JCR 2017 Impact factor of Ann Lab Med was 1.916.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书