{"title":"Riverine Flood Forecasting Using Advanced Deep Learning Approaches","authors":"Krishna Panthi, Mostafa Saberian, Vidya Samadi","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate riverine flood forecasting is crucial for effective river management. This paper utilized the Time-Series Dense Encoder (TiDE), Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting (N-HiTS), and Patch Time Series Transformer (PatchTST) to forecast riverine flood and benchmarked their results against Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Each model was implemented with varying forecast lead times for the Proctor Creek–Chattahoochee watershed, Georgia, USA. Additionally, the sensitivity of each model was evaluated by excluding meteorological forcing features one by one to determine how the performance varied across different variables. The time of concentration (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) was incorporated as a physical parameter in the algorithm's lookback window. The trained models were evaluated separately on event-based simulations. The Diebold–Mariano statistical test was utilized for a thorough analysis of performance. Analysis revealed that PatchTST outperformed the other models during moderate-flow regimes while falling behind during extreme flooding events. An 18- to 24-h lookback window was found to be statistically optimal for the models. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that PatchTST was slightly more sensitive to the selected training data features. Incorporating <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> into the lookback window revealed that TiDE and LSTM showed better performance when using a sequence length of 18 h while PatchTST achieved the best results with a 24-h lookback window.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Accurate riverine flood forecasting is crucial for effective river management. This paper utilized the Time-Series Dense Encoder (TiDE), Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting (N-HiTS), and Patch Time Series Transformer (PatchTST) to forecast riverine flood and benchmarked their results against Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Each model was implemented with varying forecast lead times for the Proctor Creek–Chattahoochee watershed, Georgia, USA. Additionally, the sensitivity of each model was evaluated by excluding meteorological forcing features one by one to determine how the performance varied across different variables. The time of concentration () was incorporated as a physical parameter in the algorithm's lookback window. The trained models were evaluated separately on event-based simulations. The Diebold–Mariano statistical test was utilized for a thorough analysis of performance. Analysis revealed that PatchTST outperformed the other models during moderate-flow regimes while falling behind during extreme flooding events. An 18- to 24-h lookback window was found to be statistically optimal for the models. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that PatchTST was slightly more sensitive to the selected training data features. Incorporating into the lookback window revealed that TiDE and LSTM showed better performance when using a sequence length of 18 h while PatchTST achieved the best results with a 24-h lookback window.
期刊介绍:
JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy.
JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.