Riverine Flood Forecasting Using Advanced Deep Learning Approaches

IF 3 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Krishna Panthi, Mostafa Saberian, Vidya Samadi
{"title":"Riverine Flood Forecasting Using Advanced Deep Learning Approaches","authors":"Krishna Panthi,&nbsp;Mostafa Saberian,&nbsp;Vidya Samadi","doi":"10.1111/1752-1688.70150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Accurate riverine flood forecasting is crucial for effective river management. This paper utilized the Time-Series Dense Encoder (TiDE), Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting (N-HiTS), and Patch Time Series Transformer (PatchTST) to forecast riverine flood and benchmarked their results against Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Each model was implemented with varying forecast lead times for the Proctor Creek–Chattahoochee watershed, Georgia, USA. Additionally, the sensitivity of each model was evaluated by excluding meteorological forcing features one by one to determine how the performance varied across different variables. The time of concentration (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) was incorporated as a physical parameter in the algorithm's lookback window. The trained models were evaluated separately on event-based simulations. The Diebold–Mariano statistical test was utilized for a thorough analysis of performance. Analysis revealed that PatchTST outperformed the other models during moderate-flow regimes while falling behind during extreme flooding events. An 18- to 24-h lookback window was found to be statistically optimal for the models. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that PatchTST was slightly more sensitive to the selected training data features. Incorporating <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msub>\n <mi>T</mi>\n <mi>c</mi>\n </msub>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {T}_c $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math> into the lookback window revealed that TiDE and LSTM showed better performance when using a sequence length of 18 h while PatchTST achieved the best results with a 24-h lookback window.</p>","PeriodicalId":17234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","volume":"62 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1752-1688.70150","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of The American Water Resources Association","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1752-1688.70150","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accurate riverine flood forecasting is crucial for effective river management. This paper utilized the Time-Series Dense Encoder (TiDE), Neural Hierarchical Interpolation for Time Series Forecasting (N-HiTS), and Patch Time Series Transformer (PatchTST) to forecast riverine flood and benchmarked their results against Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM). Each model was implemented with varying forecast lead times for the Proctor Creek–Chattahoochee watershed, Georgia, USA. Additionally, the sensitivity of each model was evaluated by excluding meteorological forcing features one by one to determine how the performance varied across different variables. The time of concentration ( T c $$ {T}_c $$ ) was incorporated as a physical parameter in the algorithm's lookback window. The trained models were evaluated separately on event-based simulations. The Diebold–Mariano statistical test was utilized for a thorough analysis of performance. Analysis revealed that PatchTST outperformed the other models during moderate-flow regimes while falling behind during extreme flooding events. An 18- to 24-h lookback window was found to be statistically optimal for the models. The sensitivity analysis results indicated that PatchTST was slightly more sensitive to the selected training data features. Incorporating T c $$ {T}_c $$ into the lookback window revealed that TiDE and LSTM showed better performance when using a sequence length of 18 h while PatchTST achieved the best results with a 24-h lookback window.

利用先进的深度学习方法进行河流洪水预报
准确的河流洪水预报对有效的河流管理至关重要。本文利用时间序列密集编码器(TiDE)、时间序列预测神经递阶插值(N-HiTS)和补丁时间序列变压器(PatchTST)对河流洪水进行预测,并将其结果与长短期记忆(LSTM)进行对比。每个模型都在美国乔治亚州的Proctor Creek-Chattahoochee流域实施了不同的预测前置时间。此外,通过逐个排除气象强迫特征来评估每个模式的敏感性,以确定不同变量之间的性能变化情况。将浓度时间(T c $$ {T}_c $$)作为算法回看窗口的物理参数。训练后的模型分别在基于事件的模拟中进行评估。使用Diebold-Mariano统计检验对性能进行了全面分析。分析表明,PatchTST在中等流量条件下优于其他模型,而在极端洪水事件下落后于其他模型。从统计上看,18到24小时的回顾窗口对模型是最优的。敏感性分析结果表明,PatchTST对所选训练数据特征的敏感性略高。将T c $$ {T}_c $$纳入回看窗口,发现TiDE和LSTM在序列长度为18 h时表现出更好的性能,而PatchTST在序列长度为24 h时表现出最好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of The American Water Resources Association
Journal of The American Water Resources Association 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
12.50%
发文量
100
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: JAWRA seeks to be the preeminent scholarly publication on multidisciplinary water resources issues. JAWRA papers present ideas derived from multiple disciplines woven together to give insight into a critical water issue, or are based primarily upon a single discipline with important applications to other disciplines. Papers often cover the topics of recent AWRA conferences such as riparian ecology, geographic information systems, adaptive management, and water policy. JAWRA authors present work within their disciplinary fields to a broader audience. Our Associate Editors and reviewers reflect this diversity to ensure a knowledgeable and fair review of a broad range of topics. We particularly encourage submissions of papers which impart a ''take home message'' our readers can use.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书