Current Status And Treatment of Contaminated Soil at Nuclear Facility Sites

IF 3.4 4区 工程技术 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
In-Ho Yoon, Haein Kim, Gayeon Kim, Ilgook Kim
{"title":"Current Status And Treatment of Contaminated Soil at Nuclear Facility Sites","authors":"In-Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Haein Kim,&nbsp;Gayeon Kim,&nbsp;Ilgook Kim","doi":"10.1007/s11814-026-00756-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Soil contamination at nuclear facility sites represents one of the most complex environmental challenges of the nuclear age, encompassing accident-impacted landscapes, legacy defense complexes, and decommissioning nuclear power plants (NPPs). This review evaluates the current status of radionuclide-contaminated soils and critically assesses physical, chemical, biological, and emerging integrated remediation technologies. The environmental behavior of key radionuclides (¹³⁷Cs, ⁹⁰Sr, U, Pu, ⁹⁹Tc, ¹²⁹I) is governed by distinct physicochemical mechanisms that critically influence technology selection. Comparative analysis of case studies from Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl, Hanford Site, Savannah River Site, Sellafield Site, and decommissioning projects demonstrates that no remediation strategy is universally optimal. Physical topsoil removal achieved 75–97% radiocesium reduction at Fukushima but generated substantial secondary waste, while in-situ immobilization strategies minimize disturbance but require long-term performance monitoring. Emerging technologies including magnetic nanocomposites and electrokinetic remediation coupled with permeable reactive barriers show promising volume reduction efficiencies of 80–93%. Future progress requires improved source-term characterization, ALARA-based decision frameworks, and field-validated modular treatment trains targeting mobile fractions of ⁹⁰Sr, ⁹⁹Tc, and ¹²⁹I.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":684,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","volume":"43 11","pages":"2879 - 2898"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11814-026-00756-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil contamination at nuclear facility sites represents one of the most complex environmental challenges of the nuclear age, encompassing accident-impacted landscapes, legacy defense complexes, and decommissioning nuclear power plants (NPPs). This review evaluates the current status of radionuclide-contaminated soils and critically assesses physical, chemical, biological, and emerging integrated remediation technologies. The environmental behavior of key radionuclides (¹³⁷Cs, ⁹⁰Sr, U, Pu, ⁹⁹Tc, ¹²⁹I) is governed by distinct physicochemical mechanisms that critically influence technology selection. Comparative analysis of case studies from Fukushima Daiichi, Chernobyl, Hanford Site, Savannah River Site, Sellafield Site, and decommissioning projects demonstrates that no remediation strategy is universally optimal. Physical topsoil removal achieved 75–97% radiocesium reduction at Fukushima but generated substantial secondary waste, while in-situ immobilization strategies minimize disturbance but require long-term performance monitoring. Emerging technologies including magnetic nanocomposites and electrokinetic remediation coupled with permeable reactive barriers show promising volume reduction efficiencies of 80–93%. Future progress requires improved source-term characterization, ALARA-based decision frameworks, and field-validated modular treatment trains targeting mobile fractions of ⁹⁰Sr, ⁹⁹Tc, and ¹²⁹I.

核设施场址污染土壤现状及治理
核设施场地的土壤污染是核时代最复杂的环境挑战之一,包括受事故影响的景观、遗留防御复合体和退役核电站(NPPs)。本文综述了放射性核素污染土壤的现状,并对物理、化学、生物和新兴的综合修复技术进行了批判性评估。关键放射性核素(¹³⁷Cs,⁹⁰Sr, U, Pu,⁹⁰Tc,¹²⁹I)的环境行为受不同的物理化学机制控制,这些机制对技术选择具有关键影响。福岛第一核电站、切尔诺贝利核电站、汉福德核电站、萨凡纳河核电站、塞拉菲尔德核电站和退役项目的案例对比分析表明,没有一种修复策略是普遍最优的。在福岛,物理表土去除实现了75-97%的放射性减少,但产生了大量的二次废物,而原位固定策略最大限度地减少了干扰,但需要长期监测性能。新兴技术包括磁性纳米复合材料和电动力学修复,以及可渗透的反应性屏障,显示出80-93%的体积减少效率。未来的进展需要改进源项表征、基于ala的决策框架,以及针对9⁰Sr、9⁰Tc和¹²⁹I的流动组分的经过现场验证的模块化处理训练。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
310
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering provides a global forum for the dissemination of research in chemical engineering. The Journal publishes significant research results obtained in the Asia-Pacific region, and simultaneously introduces recent technical progress made in other areas of the world to this region. Submitted research papers must be of potential industrial significance and specifically concerned with chemical engineering. The editors will give preference to papers having a clearly stated practical scope and applicability in the areas of chemical engineering, and to those where new theoretical concepts are supported by new experimental details. The Journal also regularly publishes featured reviews on emerging and industrially important subjects of chemical engineering as well as selected papers presented at international conferences on the subjects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书