{"title":"Spoofing Detection in NavIC: Behavioral Analysis of Key Observables and Insights from GEO/GSO Stability","authors":"Sheetal Tanna, Shweta Shah","doi":"10.1007/s12647-026-00928-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Spoofing disrupts the normal behaviour of GNSS signals by introducing subtle but measurable changes in key observables. Detecting such attacks requires the receiver to distinguish these abnormal patterns from the naturally stable characteristics of genuine signals. This study evaluates the vulnerability of NavIC to spoofing through a series of controlled static experiments and assesses the performance of commonly used statistical detection techniques. The analysis focuses on pseudorange and Doppler measurements, as these parameters consistently show early deviations when counterfeit signals are introduced. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically compares multiple statistical detection frameworks (e.g., the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT), Mahalanobis distance) using NavIC-specific observables such as inter-satellite pseudorange and Doppler variance under spoofing conditions. Among the approaches examined, the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) demonstrates the most reliable detection capability across different spoofing conditions. Time-series observations further highlight the inherent stability of NavIC’s GEO/GSO satellites, which restricts the effectiveness of spoofing attempts by making departures from normal behaviour more noticeable. The results suggest that NavIC’s constellation geometry naturally supports early spoofing detection, and that coupling these features with machine-learning-based classifiers in future work could enhance robustness against a wider range of spoofing strategies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":689,"journal":{"name":"MAPAN","volume":"41 3","pages":"789 - 802"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MAPAN","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12647-026-00928-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INSTRUMENTS & INSTRUMENTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Spoofing disrupts the normal behaviour of GNSS signals by introducing subtle but measurable changes in key observables. Detecting such attacks requires the receiver to distinguish these abnormal patterns from the naturally stable characteristics of genuine signals. This study evaluates the vulnerability of NavIC to spoofing through a series of controlled static experiments and assesses the performance of commonly used statistical detection techniques. The analysis focuses on pseudorange and Doppler measurements, as these parameters consistently show early deviations when counterfeit signals are introduced. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study that systematically compares multiple statistical detection frameworks (e.g., the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT), Mahalanobis distance) using NavIC-specific observables such as inter-satellite pseudorange and Doppler variance under spoofing conditions. Among the approaches examined, the Generalized Likelihood Ratio Test (GLRT) demonstrates the most reliable detection capability across different spoofing conditions. Time-series observations further highlight the inherent stability of NavIC’s GEO/GSO satellites, which restricts the effectiveness of spoofing attempts by making departures from normal behaviour more noticeable. The results suggest that NavIC’s constellation geometry naturally supports early spoofing detection, and that coupling these features with machine-learning-based classifiers in future work could enhance robustness against a wider range of spoofing strategies.
期刊介绍:
MAPAN-Journal Metrology Society of India is a quarterly publication. It is exclusively devoted to Metrology (Scientific, Industrial or Legal). It has been fulfilling an important need of Metrologists and particularly of quality practitioners by publishing exclusive articles on scientific, industrial and legal metrology.
The journal publishes research communication or technical articles of current interest in measurement science; original work, tutorial or survey papers in any metrology related area; reviews and analytical studies in metrology; case studies on reliability, uncertainty in measurements; and reports and results of intercomparison and proficiency testing.